Ever since Regulation 225 hit the Delaware Registrar of Regulations, I’ve been scratching my head over it. I’ve gone back and forth on it a few dozen times. To be crystal clear, I support any anti-discrimination measure for ANY student. No questions asked. Some of the Facebook comments I’ve seen from some who oppose the bill are filled with hate and misunderstanding. I’ve wondered what the purpose behind all this was, and today I may have received an answer. Continue reading “Is Regulation 225 A Union-Busting Measure? Know When You Are Being Used!”
The end times are nigh. I read an opinion piece by Paul Herdman on delawareonline and found myself agreeing with a lot of what the CEO of the Rodel Foundation of Delaware was saying. No, I don’t have food poisoning. I haven’t been drugged. I didn’t slip on a banana peel and pass out. But Dr. Paul Herdman and I both seem to agree on disagreeing with some of the cuts the Delaware Joint Finance Committee proposed a few weeks ago. I know, I couldn’t believe it myself!
What Doc Herdman is lamenting are cuts to early childhood education and college access. I believe every student, if they have the means and even if they can get help, should go to college. I also think early childhood education is very important. While the Doc and I disagree on the methods, I have to believe we both want kids to get the best education possible. While he may think Common Core, Smarter Balanced, Personalized Learning and Competency-Based Education are the best ways, I think true instruction in the classroom with teacher-created tests and assessments are the way to go. I don’t think kids need all this educational technology in the classroom. I don’t think we need all these leadership training classes. Leaders should come naturally, not some profit-induced seminar brought on by Education Inc. The best education leaders are those with advanced knowledge of education through advanced masters degrees and come up through years of teaching.
But any cuts to education aren’t good. I wish the Doc would go a step further and go after wasteful spending at the Delaware Dept. of Education and all that trickles down to our schools as a result of their continued corporate education reform shenanigans. I wish he would urge our General Assembly to fully fund our state auditor’s office so they can, you know, actually follow Delaware law and properly audit our school districts each year. I was really hoping he would recommend our General Assembly (finally) implements basic special education funding for students in Kindergarten to 3rd grade, especially with his background in special education. But I’ll take what I can get.
The final week of the 149th Delaware General Assembly’s 2017 session is going to be absolutely crazy. I’ve told others. It won’t be over by July 1st. The gap is just too big and I’ve heard several legislators say “I won’t vote for the budget if (insert this cut or this attempted revenue here).” I don’t blame them. But some pain will have to come in this budget. It is my fervent hope students won’t lose out. I do support district consolidation in Delaware and while there are those who think it won’t amount to much saving, we won’t know unless we really study it. It is my contention there would be considerable savings. I do support shared resources, like Herdman. Whether it is a traditional, charter, or vo-tech, why wouldn’t we come together as a state to make sure students have all the resources they need? I don’t think school boards should be given a one-time chance to raise the match tax without a referendum as I truly believe that will hurt school districts when they do need to go out for a referendum. If districts and charters can actually share, all students would win. It takes some pride swallowing on both ends. Get rid of the charter school transportation slush fund or any perks for charters out of the budget. It only aggravates the us vs. them mentality. Truth is, there should be no us vs. them. It should be education for all students. Get rid of old, antiquated laws that create any type of de facto segregation.
The truth is, the Doc and I probably agree on a lot of things but our differences cast us as polar opposites. I’m sure he is a good guy, and yes, I think he should be taxed at a higher tax bracket along with the rest of the $150,000 and over club. This does not mean, by any stretch, I will attempt to get on the Rodel Advisory Council.
Eve Buckley wrote a brilliant post on Facebook today. With her permission, I wanted to get this out to a wider audience since she hit the nail on the head with what is going on in Delaware public education in the face of disastrous cuts school districts are facing. Eve, like myself, is a parent in Delaware. Her children go to Christina schools. She was also in attendance at Paul Baumbach’s Education Forum at Newark High School last night.
Delaware friends, the take-away from last night’s education forum, for me, was that the state has–as we know–an enormous budgetary crisis and currently no political capacity to raise revenue, since GOP legislators have pledged not to raise taxes. Unless this changes, we will cut everywhere, deeply–and as far as I know, there is no reason to believe this will improve next year. Governor Carney does not have a viable plan to address this huge structural problem. Democratic legislators, many of whom are quite willing to approve property tax reassessment [for the first time in DECADES], need a 3/5 majority vote to pass that and cannot move forward without support from at least two Republican legislators. All of us can write to Gov. Carney about the need to responsibly address the state’s serious budgetary challenges. Everyone should contact their state legislators, but esp. if yours (in House or Senate) is Republican. Tell them how these cuts will impact your children’s educational opportunities; if your child attends Christina district, it is facing a $6 million shortfall for next year due to the reduction in state funds, which translates to a dozen or more staff/teacher cuts at each middle and high school, and presumably some staff cuts from every school. These individuals have already been notified, which is demoralizing for everyone in those communities–as Newark HS students made clear last night.
Note that state-authorized charters (the vast majority of DE’s charters, outside of Red Clay district) are not as severely affected by these cuts, the logic being that Carney proposes giving district boards one-time authorization to make up about two-thirds of his proposed cuts via a “match tax,” which would generate revenue only for district schools. This puts the elected district boards in a quandary: schools need those funds, but by replacing the state shortfall with a board-authorized increase in local taxes, the districts will probably lose any capacity to pass a referendum in the future, as many residents will be infuriated by this extraordinary maneuver. For the moment, this proposed mechanism for recouping district revenue via a one-time match tax (and subjecting ONLY district schools to the corresponding state cuts) means that charter school staff are not being notified of job losses, at least not on the scale that district schools are experiencing. Aside from the seeming unfairness of this, it also means that charter families, generally quite mobilizable to advance their children’s interests, are probably less aware of how severe the state’s education funding crisis is–and only 13 legislative days remain before the state’s budget will be finalized. For me, this is another example of the damage we do to the democratic process by “packaging” public services differently for different members of our communities; we are not all in this together. That is a serious loss, reducing the likelihood that schools and families will get what they need from the state. Democracy is a numbers game, and our numbers are significantly diminished by our fractured public ed. landscape.
As always, Exceptional Delaware wants and solicits for guest posts on education matters. Thank you!
If there is one consistent thing I hear all over social media, it is people wanting the number of administrators and their staff in Delaware school districts and charter schools. I am asked constantly how many there are for various schools or districts. Robert Overmiller of the Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens compiled a list showing exactly how many there are.
Updated: I’ve included the below picture which shows the student ratios required to get state funding for administrator roles:
Some of these numbers are outrageous. While it is a local school district’s decision, there are certain laws pertaining to how many administrators schools are allowed to have per student in order to get state funding for those roles. If they go over those numbers, the funds come from local or federal funding. For example, a Title I or special education coordinator may get funding based on federal disbursements.
If we truly want to look at education funding, this is the FIRST place to look. Many of these positions get high salaries. I’ve heard of some administrators who just get jobs in a district office and do nothing all day long. Does every single administrator need a secretary? Because that happens more than you think! It’s the buddy system kicked into high gear. And our teachers and students pay the price.
Last December, the 15 Delaware charter schools and the Christina School District settled in a lawsuit over local funding from Christina to the charters. The district agreed to pay that portion of their local funding (even though the Delaware DOE colossally screwed up) going forward and both the DOE and Christina had to pay the charters attorney fees. As well, wording in the settlement around special education funding indicated there could be a change in the air with those payments. As well, the match tax was brought up in the settlement (but not decided on) and whether charters should get a portion of that. Almost six months later, I am curious if you agree or not whether this was a fair settlement.
Governor Carney sent a letter to all Delaware public school teachers this morning for Teacher Appreciation Week. The irony of this letter, as several Delaware school districts are getting ready to layoff teachers, is astounding. Because of Carney’s proposed budget for FY2018, Delaware school districts are put in a no-win situation. School boards can either raise property taxes with the match tax or reduce their own budgets (of which they have to do anyways). Carney shifted the onus of the budget deficit away from his office with his “shared sacrifice” language. What he did was attempt to make damn sure the taxpayers of the state shift their anger at Delaware school boards when their taxes go up or see their children suffocate in huge classrooms with less teachers and programs.
I have this to say to Governor Carney: what you have done is shady and despicable. It is the ultimate in political posturing, but your muscle flex is going to backfire on you. You won’t get away with playing the budgetary Darth Vader where others do the dirty work for you if you want to survive past 2020. Your opponents are most likely salivating over all this because you exposed a major Achilles heel very early in the game. And you better believe if charters somehow benefit over all this, I won’t be the only one protesting. Many will join me. As an example, will the General Assembly get rid of the very useless charter school transportation slush fund? Will charter schools also have teacher layoffs? Will they actually lose some of their transportation budget like all the local school districts will? If the answer to any of these is a no, I don’t see much “shared” sacrifice.
If any members of our General Assembly think they can sneak in the usual perks into the epilogue language of the budget in the final hours of this legislative session (I’m talking to you most of all Mrs. Death Penalty flipper), it will cause a ruckus unseen in Legislative Hall for some time.
It is past time Delaware stopped using students and teachers as sacrificial lambs. It isn’t just Carney and the General Assembly who are doing this, it is also the school districts. I have yet to see any school district cutting administrative positions. So far, I am fairly sure Indian River, Christina, Caesar Rodney, and Colonial will be cutting teachers. That list will grow.
Below is Carney’s letter to teachers. Like I said, this is almost insulting. I have no doubt students said many things about their teachers, but Carney (or whichever staff member wrote this letter) seems to cherry-pick certain things to further
his Rodel’s own agenda. Can we just stop pretending John Carney? Just come out and rename the state Rodelaware. You aren’t fooling anyone. This letter demands the famous “John Young redline edition”…
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:34:32 AM
To: K12 Employees
Subject: Thank you
As the nation recognizes National Teacher Appreciation Week, we in Delaware have a lot to celebrate. Secretary of Education Susan Bunting joins me in thanking all of you for helping our students succeed in school and in life.
When you say “celebrate”, who is celebrating? Of course Bunting is going to join you. She will do whatever you want! Nothing against Dr. Bunting, but if I have learned one thing about a Governor’s Cabinet, they follow whatever the Governor says, which usually translates to what Rodel wants. Please don’t use words like celebrate at the same time teachers are facing unemployment. It is the ultimate insult.
If I needed any help remembering how lucky we are in Delaware to have such great educators, I got it Monday morning. Secretary Bunting and I visited Capital School District’s Hartly Elementary School and I asked the students why their teachers are special. Their rapid-fire answers were right on point:
What were the other answers provided by students? I have a very hard time believing that the majority of answers given by students in an elementary school were geared towards post-secondary education plans. But I’m sure the Rodel and Delaware Business Roundtable business types love these answers. Feed the beast!
“They make sure we’re ready for college.”
“Without them we wouldn’t know how to use decimal points.”
Okay, that’s a good answer.
“They’re helping us get good jobs some day.”
By standardize testing the hell out of these kids and forcing them to learn in digital technology classrooms, the state is robbing children of a true educational experience. This data collecting of children, geared towards shifting the workforce to select jobs for the future, is social engineering at its absolute worst Governor Carney. Please stop with the Markellian way of thinking and be your own man.
And my favorite:
“They teach us to care about each other.”
Awwww, that is so cute. Reminding teachers, as many prepare to get pink slips, that it is about the students and they should just shut up and share the sacrifice for the good of the state. And just so you know, many Delaware parents teach their children to care about each other. That isn’t solely owned by teachers. For many students, it is. But parents across the state play the main part in raising their children. So let’s not even get into the plans to transform education into a “public-private partnership”. Kids need to be in brick and mortar schools, not the local non-profits at younger ages.
Our kids get it. They know just how much you do and how invested you are in them.
Yeah, too bad our state isn’t invested in them. Too bad they aren’t invested in our students either. Unless you like having over 35 kids in a classroom. Tell me Governor Carney, how many kids were in YOUR classrooms when you went to school back in the day? But let’s keep paying for Smarter Balanced and all the Common Core bullshit. Let’s keep our classrooms wired at all times so corporations get those nice bottom line numbers at the expense of students. Let’s let the data whores continue to collect private information on our students through their iPhones and Google Chrome. Schools, teachers, and students are not “investments”. Those are corporate education reform words. Yes, the children are the future, but by putting them in terms of financial gain, you insult every single child in this state.
I hope you were able to join us on April 27, when we hosted a Telephone Town Hall with Delaware educators to discuss issues around public education in Delaware. Specifically, we discussed education and our state budget.
I was on that call. Most town halls end when the questions run out. But not on your schedule Governor Carney.
This is an important discussion, and I will continue to listen to educators during school visits across Delaware. We face a $400 million budget shortfall, but I remain dedicated to each of you and your students.
Dedication is more than “listening”. It means making damn sure any sacrifice stays the hell out of the classroom. But you can’t do that, can you? Let’s pray our General Assembly finally and collectively says NO to your horrible budget proposal.
Our plan is to fix our structural deficit, and get to a place where we can again invest in areas that will move our state forward: early childhood education, arts, additional supports for at-risk students, health and wellness, and after-school programing, to name a few.
The key wording is “get to a place”. That means you want to kick the can down the road, which Delaware is fantastic at doing. Your predecessor was excellent in that regard. “Invest now” all too often means “pay the price later”. No child should pay the price for adult decisions. If you want to fix the structural deficit, how about you actually go after delinquent property taxes? Sign an Executive Order demanding the counties exert pressure on those who feel they don’t have to pay at all! Like the Chinese company that owes Red Clay over a million bucks in back property taxes. Or the golf club in Middletown that likes to play games with Appoquinimink. Make sure our State Auditor has the ability to properly audit our schools and see where every single penny in Delaware education funding is REALLY going. Cause we both know there is foul play going on in some circumstances. But turning a blind eye to that has helped to lead us to where we are at now.
All Delaware students deserve a quality education, and an equal opportunity to succeed. And I know you work hard every day to deliver on that promise. Thank you for all you do.
All Delaware students do deserve a quality education. But not your definition of it. And let’s not even get into this “weighted funding” nonsense. We both know what that is really about Governor Carney, don’t we. If I were you, I would give considerable thought in the next week to revising your proposed budget. Because if you truly care about students, this is not the way to go. I tried to give you a chance and have faith in you. I have yet to see you live up to that promise. Tax the rich more. Seriously. That is the best way to start.
Kevin Ohlandt, the blogger who is getting sick of public education being a sacrificial lamb to the likes of Rodel and the Delaware Business Roundtable in the name of corporate profit and social engineering.
We can do it better ourselves but we won’t tell them that.
The Delaware State Board of Education could be shut down as of Tuesday. They face the Delaware Joint Legislative Overview and Sunset Committee. The State Board was put under review by the committee last year after some very rough years under former Governor Jack Markell. Many of the complaints circulate around their Executive Director, Donna Johnson. As well, many citizens and education organizations in the state feel the State Board has outlived their usefulness and just seem to perpetuate agendas brought forth by corporate education reform organizations such as the Rodel Foundation of Delaware and the Delaware Charter Schools Network. I wrote about their last meeting with the committee over a month ago. But I was able to be the sole attendee at a meeting yesterday where the State Board discussed their final meeting with the Sunset Committee and boy was it a doozy! Continue reading “High Noon For The Delaware State Board of Education On Tuesday”
This article originally appeared on the McAndrews Law website. Attorney Caitlin McAndrews wrote this and it is very important! It has pivotal information that parents of students with disabilities need to know about during the IEP process. Parents, even with the best of intentions, can make mistakes during this process. I agree with the author: give as much information as you possibly can to help your special needs child succeed!
Parents sometimes withhold information from School Districts, worried that the District will find a way to “use it against them.” This can include privately obtained evaluations, information from outside therapists or medical providers, or changes in medication. Though the instinct to protect your child’s privacy is understandable, withholding this type of information from the educators who work with your student typically does more harm than good.
In the example of an independent evaluation, providing the report to the District only gives them more information about how your child learns, which they should use to appropriately program for the student. Hopefully, the District will use the evaluation to help provide appropriate supports and services; but even if they do not, the family can at least say they provided all available information to the District. If parents have to go to a hearing, and they withheld a private evaluation, a hearing officer may hold that against the parent, and may question why the parent withheld outside information about the child that could have helped the District understand and program for the child.
Additionally, the private evaluation might contain information that would trigger the District’s Child Find obligation – that is, by putting the District on notice that the child has certain needs/diagnoses, and might require special education support. If the District never saw the outside evaluation, it may be harder to prove that the District knew of the child’s disabilities.
Similarly, Districts often request permission to speak to outside providers, such as private speech/language or occupational therapists, treating psychologists, or pediatricians. This information could help the District program for your child, and withholding it can make a parent appear uncooperative in front of a hearing officer.
In general, the instinct to hold back can be a very natural and protective one, but ultimately, parents should ask themselves, “What am I afraid will happen if I share this information?” and “What good could potentially come from sharing?” In the vast majority of cases, the potential good will outweigh the potential harm.
By Caitlin McAndrews, Esq., McAndrews Law Offices, P.C.
Racism in Delaware is very real. We saw it clearly with the situation at a Delaware Military Academy basketball game. Alleged racial slurs were yelled out by DMA students. When the A.I. Dupont High School basketball team was told to stay in their chairs after the game, members went to go towards the seats where they heard the horrible words. No adult will come forward about this and use honor instead of protecting their charter school. Why?
Racism is rampant in Delaware. Our media, especially The News Journal, does not do enough to curb this. Every time they post any article about issues that could possibly involve race, the hatred pours out in their comments. Perhaps they remove these but they have no filters whatsoever to prevent words like nigger being thrown out there. Don’t believe me? Check out this comment from their poll last night about the DMA/AI incident:
I don’t condone the use of that word by anyone, whether they are black or white. It is a word from history that signifies a time when black people were owned by white people. I don’t believe any race or culture should own the word. It is ugly and full of hatred. We all bleed the same blood. We all smile the same smile and we all shed the same tears. Maybe because I was raised in a home where the value of respecting others was instilled in me at a very early age is the reason I can’t even fathom this kind of hatred.
President Trump, for all his faults, does not bring out this kind of hatred in people. It is there and always has been. There are those who may not like the words but fail to do anything about as evidenced by this comment from a DMA parent:
Fear of retaliation. I’ve heard those words so many times to justify bad decisions in others. If you find those words unacceptable then do the right thing and speak up. What kind of message are you sending your child? That it is okay for others to say things that are unacceptable in today’s society? That adults can act just as bad as kids which further perpetuates racism? Speak up parent! By hiding things and covering them up, you are teaching your own child that it is okay for these things to happen. It is not okay. It is not right. Your job as a parent is to prepare your child for adulthood and instill in them a sense of right and wrong. We all want to protect our children, I get that. But if doing it has a cost that could make anyone think certain things are okay are you really doing your job as a parent? If administrators allow this to continue, what does that say about the school you chose to send your child to? Taking away a senior night, which is the first I’ve heard of any punishment for DMA students, is not enough. If this indeed happened, that would indicate wrong-doing on the DMA team and cheerleaders. If no racial slurs were thrown out, why a punishment at all?
Schools like Delaware Military Academy, Charter School of Wilmington, and Newark Charter School all have very low African-American populations compared to the schools around them. Some have even suggested they allow this culture of racism to continue so they get more white students. This furthers segregation in Delaware, especially around Wilmington. If these charters truly cared about diversity, they would do something about it. Instead, we get long drawn-out essays, significant expenses surrounding school uniforms and sports, and specific interests that dissuade low-income families and minorities from even applying. Despite the many who have called them out on this, our General Assembly turns a blind eye to this and allows this to continue. Despite federal guidance suggesting any specific enrollment should be designed to let students with the highest needs in.
Did the A.I. DuPont H.S. coach do the right thing? Many have suggested he did. By suspending the team for the rest of the season he sent a message that despite what others say reacting to it can only make the situation worse. But what about those players who are being called one of the most vile words in existence? The News Journal wrote an editorial and said the coach made the right decision. However, they did not mention one word about the alleged racial slurs. To me, that word is meant to strip away the humanity from a person and make them feel like less then a human being. Even though the above comment no longer appears in the comments of a poll they put up last night they allowed it to go up. Even by putting a poll up to see if the coach did the right thing without all the information conveyed to those answering the poll, they are slanting the issue.
Delaware is an odd state. We are a state between the south and the north. One only needs to look at the riots in Wilmington in the 1960s to see Delaware’s history with race issues. We still struggle with this in the present. Generations of hatred against black people still exist to this very day. But no one wants to really bring it out in the open. Those of us who try are chastised and told to shut up. That we have no idea what we are talking about. But it continues, every day. Every time we allow any institution to further issues of race, we are allowing the problem to continue. Any time we allow a school, a building of education, to not have student populations that match the local area, we are letting it happen.
The charter schools I mentioned were a cure for not-so-wealthy parents of white students who couldn’t afford to send their kids to private schools. They didn’t want their kids in “those” schools so some of our legislators created the perfect situation: schools with predominant white populations and barriers that effectively prevented “those” kids from even getting into that system. And many parents rushed towards the opportunity. Attack one of those charters and the parents will come out in full force to defend the school with a “How dare you” attitude. They will defend these institutions that further discrimination at the cost of their own souls. They don’t even see they are doing it.
Any person who makes themselves better than another with words designed to hurt someone based on race, gender, disability, age, or social status is discriminatory. They are racist. They are advancing their old-world vision on present-day society. Anyone who fails to speak out about these things happening is living in a fear basket cuddled up in a blanket called enablement. You are allowing this to continue. You are just as bad. If your child was given a hard time at school would you not speak up for them? Most of us would. We wouldn’t worry about fear of retaliation because it is the right thing to speak up for your child and advocate for them when they are unable to. So why would you not speak up when you see your child’s environment is hostile and ugly? That can be just as damaging as any situation where someone comes after your child. You are failing as a parent when you don’t speak up about injustice. If we all did that when we should, there wouldn’t be so much injustice. It would send a clear message that this will not be tolerated. It is unacceptable. We will not be a victim to your cruel words and hatred.
Children are the most susceptible and vulnerable population in this country. They absorb what is around them. If parents show racism as issues at the dinner table or use words to describe people that are not good, kids pick up on it and at a very early age. It becomes part of their personality. It goes both ways with race. Putting down the white man in front of your kids can elicit the same behaviors in kids. I go back to “Remember The Titans”. If it really went down that way, I don’t know. It had to have been “Disneyfied” to some degree. But the message is clear: when we band together we are all one.
I am not afraid to speak out. I will not stop defending the rights of any human being on this planet. And you can throw all the stones in the world at me but I will not let your cowardice stop me. This is why I loathe the use of high-stakes standardized testing in schools. It is just another system that puts up divides instead of unity. Far too many parents say “I don’t want my kid going to that school. Look at their test scores”. And they cycle continues. For the Delaware racists, you know who you are. You know what you harbor in your innermost thoughts. You may think you are right. You may go to church on Sundays and count your blessings. You may believe you have the might of angels behind your beliefs. But what you lack in humility and grace takes all of that away. As for media like The News Journal, telling half a story isn’t addressing any issue. Covering up things that went down and hiding behind “accounts on social media” as if that whitewashes what really went down is not journalism. It is cowardice.
Almost a day since I broke this story, DMA Commandant Anthony Pullella has not responded to my request for information about this incident. I can’t say I’m surprised. Many charter schools like to live in their own bubble and want to ignore the outside world. As if they are the beacon of society and can do no wrong. Why shouldn’t they think that? Our own state government has allowed them to thrive in that belief. Our legislators can sit in their legislative chambers and condemn actions that took place 150 years ago but when the time comes for them to address the true issues that are perpetuating racism, discrimination, and segregation in our state, far too many of them do nothing. Especially when it comes to education. There are those who will fight on these issues, reps like Kim Williams, John Kowalko, and others. But they do not hold the majority. All too often, bills are saturated with words that eventually continue Delaware’s backwards slide into racism. Some don’t even realize this at the time. Critics of issues involving racism and discrimination are all too often marginalized in this state. Our issues become back burner because money and power have the influence in Dover, not what is right. It becomes politics, not morality and doing what is right.
Unless you have been spoken down to like you are less than you are as much as African-Americans have in our very racist state, how can you effectively say you are right? Have you ever walked in the shoes of someone who has been demeaned and humiliated? If the answer is no, then kindly shut up. We don’t want your hatred spewing out of your mouth. I will never condone violence as a response to hatred. It does nothing except make the situation worse. But to point out the potential of violence without addressing why it got to that point is highly irresponsible.
*Please see below for a statement from Delaware Senator Brian Pettyjohn in regards to this letter.
This morning, Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams published a letter from several state legislators around the country supporting Betsy DeVos in her nomination for the United States Secretary of Education. Senators Anthony DelCollo, Greg Lavelle, Ernie Lopez, Brian Pettyjohn, and Gary Simpson represented the Delaware contingent of these signatures. I am publicly asking these five Delaware Republican Senators to withdraw their support for Mrs. DeVos.
Last week, DeVos had her Senate Confirmation hearing. She did not know the difference between growth and proficiency. She supported guns in schools to prevent grizzly bear attacks. She stated when she was first nominated that she supported dismantling Common Core, but history with the DeVos Foundation suggests otherwise. She is a fervent supporter of school vouchers which have the strong potential to further issues of discrimination and segregation in American schools the way they are currently set up in many states. She supports charter schools which have not shown to be a greater success unless the pull smarter students in through selective enrollment preferences despite the legality of those preferences in many states. But most disappointing was DeVos inability to understand that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, known as IDEA, is a federal law, not a state and local law.
As a father of a student with disabilities, I was appalled when Betsy DeVos said this. The U.S. Secretary of Education is a person who leads all American students in public education. The last thing we need is someone who does not understand special education going into the job. DeVos is a billionaire but her ability to lead education in America is disturbing on many levels.
I have found myself in alignment with many bills that Pettyjohn and Lopez supported. They stood with parents during the opt out saga. They did not support the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Which is why I find their support of DeVos puzzling. Education has become synonymous with standardized testing. Students with disabilities do the poorest on these tests. But they are expected to show the most “growth” in state accountability systems. As a result, in my opinion, special education has become a gigantic mess. It is now geared more towards the student outcomes on these tests than accommodating the true needs of each individual student. If DeVos has her way, students with disabilities could be shuffled around different private schools through a very flawed school voucher system. Private schools are not obligated to follow federal special education law unless they receive federal education funds. Special education in public schools can be challenging enough, adding private schools to that mix with federal dollars could become a recipe for disaster for a population that is already marginalized to a great extent.
Once again, I urge these five Delaware Republican Senators to withdraw their support for Betsy DeVos as U.S. Secretary of Education. Our children deserve better. Students with disabilities deserve better. And my son deserves better.
**UPDATED**5:16pm: I spoke with Senator Pettyjohn about this issue shortly after I posted this article. He echoed the statement he made on Facebook, which said:
Kevin, I agreed to support Betsy DeVos for her nomination to lead the US Department of Education based on my belief that an outsider view of the US DOE is necessary. In previous statements, Ms. DeVos had indicated her disdain for the Department and it’s overburdensome policies and regulations toward states and local districts. I have, for some time, been critical of the federal intrusion into our classrooms, and prior to Ms. DeVos’ confirmation hearings, those were concerns that she had also viewed with a critical eye.
That being said, I do have concerns that have been brought to light since her confirmation hearings; especially concerning her stance on special education. While this is an issue that our United States Senators will be faced with in the coming days, I believe that the letter that was sent, which I agreed to sign before the confirmation hearings took place, will have relatively little impact on the decision that will ultimately be made on Capitol Hill.
That Senate Confirmation hearing took a lot of folks by surprise. In my eyes, it just proved that vast amounts of wealth does not always equal knowledge. DeVos will face a vote for her nomination next Tuesday, January 31st.
After some starts and stops, the Delaware Special Education Strategic Plan is almost finished. The plan has been underway since 2014 when Governor Jack Markell inserted the creation of the strategic plan in the FY2015 epilogue language of the state budget. Matthew Korobkin, the Special Education Officer through the Secretary of Education’s office at the Delaware Dept. of Education, will give a status update on the plan to the State Board of Education at their meeting on January 19th. This is not to be confused with the State of Delaware Strategic Plan for Specialized Education Opportunities.
Last fall, the Special Education Strategic Plan was retooled after disability advocates viewed an initial draft. As a result of that, along with a very big push from State Rep. Kim Williams, a Facilitated Workgroup came into formation to fine tune the plan and make sure all voices were heard. In mid-December, the newly created group had a public two-day retreat to decide what should be in the plan. From there, sub-groups worked on different parts of the plan. It is expected to be released for public comment at some point in February, shortly after the State Board of Education meeting next week. From there, at some point in March, a presentation will be given to the State of Delaware Oversight Group for the Special Education Strategic Plan which includes members of the Delaware Interagency Resource Committee, a representative from Governor Carney’s office, and the Chairs of the Senate and House Joint Finance Committee.
The stakeholder workgroup has seven goals for development of the strategic plan which include the following: Students, Parents & Families, Community, Staff/Partners, Resources, Policies & Regulations, and Delivery/Structure/Systems. Like most Strategic Plans, this one will be not be set in stone and will be considered a fluid document whereby changes and tweaks can be added as needed. But every plan needs a foundation and what we will soon see are the building blocks for this plan. Things can happen which could substantially change the plan including the Delaware state budget and the upcoming ruling on the United States Supreme Court special education case of Endrew v. Douglas County School District.
Various groups and committees revolving around special education have occurred in Delaware over the past decade, but this is the first time I have seen such a huge mix of school districts, parents, and advocacy groups. The last group to form policy around special education was the IEP Task Force from 2014 which led to a large number of changes to state law and regulations. No education plan will ever please everyone and there will be parts people love and some others disapprove of. If there is one thing I have learned in education, it is constantly evolving and nothing will ever be perfect. But I would encourage any and all persons who care about special education to give this plan a very careful read when it comes out and let your thoughts be known with a goal of improving education for special needs kids.
The members of the Facilitated Workgroup consist of the following:
Michele Marinucci, Woodbridge School District
Daphne Cartright, Autism Delaware
Edward Emmett, Positive Outcomes Charter School
Katheryn Herel, PIC of Delaware
Jon Cooper, Colonial School District
Kendall Massett, Delaware Charter Schools Network
State Representative Kim Williams, Legislator
Kristin Dwyer, DSEA
Kristin Pidgeon, Down Syndrome Association
Lisa Lawson, Brandywine School District
Mary Ann Mieczkowski, Delaware Dept. of Education
Elisha Jenkins, Division for the Visually Impaired
Bill Doolittle, Parent Advocate
Sarah Celestin, Red Clay Consolidated School District
Vincent Winterling, Delaware Autism Program
Wendy Strauss, Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens
Annalisa Ekbladh, University of Delaware Center for Disability Studies
John Marinucci, Delaware School Boards Association
Sonya Lawrence, Parent Advocate
Teresa Avery, Autism Delaware
Laurie Kettle-Rivera, Delaware School for the Deaf
Mark Campano, Delaware Statewide Programs
Josette McCullough, Appoquinimink School District
Mondaria Batchelor, Woodbridge School District
*above photo courtesy of State Rep. Kim Williams, photographed by yours truly at the 12/9 retreat
To date, three Delaware educators have announced their intention to run for President of the Delaware State Education Association. All three have announced this on Facebook. I know two of them, but I haven’t met the other candidate. Two of the candidates are running on a ticket with a Vice-President candidate. Who are these brave souls? Continue reading “DSEA President Battle Heats Up As Three Vie For The Top Spot”
It’s real easy to play Monday morning quarterback after your team just took a huge hit. Donald Trump promised (and fooled) many citizens into thinking he could get rid of Common Core. So much so that his pick for Secretary of Education is now backtracking on her years of actions financially supporting Common Core. She sits on Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education. This foundation LOVES Common Core and all that comes with it. DeVos, through the Betsy and Steve DeVos Foundation, poured millions of dollars into pro-Common Core candidates.
On some Betsy DeVos Question and Answer website that sprung out of nowhere, she denounces Common Core. This website was created on 8/16/16, but her picture was just added this month. This isn’t some long-time website that shows the DeVos denunciation of Common Core. This website was created specifically for the possibility of a Trump win. Why would anyone put up a q and a website unless they knew what the opposition would immediately come out with? This is what she has to say about Common Core. Items in red are my response to that.
Q: There’s been a lot of talk about Common Core. Can you provide some straight talk on this topic?
Certainly. I am not a supporter—period.
Financial support into candidates and states that support it IS supporting it.
I do support high standards, strong accountability, and local control. When Governors such as John Engler, Mike Huckabee, and Mike Pence were driving the conversation on voluntary high standards driven by local voices, it all made sense.
State standards, as written in the Every Student Succeeds Act, are now state decisions. Trump couldn’t dump them if he tried. There is a big difference between state and local decisions. The states now call the shots on education. The locals are just along for the ride. Local control of education is a thing of the past.
Have organizations that I have been a part of supported Common Core? Of course. But that’s not my position. Sometimes it’s not just students who need to do their homework.
I don’t even know what that means Betsy DeVos. Common Core wasn’t created because kids weren’t doing their homework. It was set up for a VERY specific reason which I will get to soon.
However, along the way, it got turned into a federalized boondoggle.
A very intentional federalized boondoggle where states gave up ALL control to the feds. Once the states adopted the standards, it didn’t end there. In came the standardized testing, the accountability game that judges failing schools based on those same tests, as well as the longitudinal data (which was the real purpose which I will also get to later) creation in every state to allow student data to go out. Once everything was set up in the states through Federal funds (most of which did not go to local schools but to state Departments of Education who paid education reform companies billions of dollars), then the reauthorization of ESEA came about. ESSA is the shift towards this future. Giving the illusion of state control based on federal mandates and snake-oil deals from the Obama administration.
Above all, I believe every child, no matter their zip code or their parents’ jobs, deserves access to a quality education.
Every single corporate education reformer says this, but being pro-school choice has not equated to greater educational improvement for children overall. Especially children that are minorities, low-income, English Language learners, and students with disabilities.
Betsy DeVos, through her foundation work for her own foundation as well as others, has been on of the biggest driving forces for the privatization of American public education. But why? Where is all of this going?
As I put up my post about DeVos selection for the U.S. Secretary of Education, I was met with an onslaught of comments stating she doesn’t support Common Core. Actions speak louder than words. I immediately directed readers to this excellent post showing how she DOES support Common Core and how. And then I wrote this:
To put this in a very easy way to understand, Common Core was created to train young minds for constant all-the-time digital learning. State assessments (based on Common Core) will become stealth assessments embedded in personalized learning/competency-based education environments. Once they bust the unions, traditional school districts will fall. Charters will go online. Our young kids will go to local non-profits to learn online while older kids learn online in a pay to earn environment through Charter Online Inc. Meanwhile, all this data from ed tech is tracking every student and whoring out their personal data and gearing them towards pre-determined professions that corporations want, not the kids. Who do you think will profit from this? Charters. Teachers will become glorified moderators while parents watch their rights slowly disappear. Their kids will go to community health-based centers for everything. This is the grand agenda. There is nothing Trump can do to stop it. Complete control over the future by corporations. Read into plans for Blockchain technology to see where all of this is going…. This has NEVER been about kids. It has always been about corporate profit.
We are now at a huge tipping point with public education. I’ve actually seen parents today, on anti-Common Core Facebook pages, actually trying to convince me DeVos is a good pick and to give her a chance. This is what the corporate education reformers do best. They pit people against each other. While everyone is arguing about this and that, they are getting things done. Planting seeds to get the whole thing done. They are the masters of distraction. Bill Gates is just one of them. Today, we saw another billionaire get the top education job in the country. With no background of ever being an educator. Do you really think it is a coincidence that the past three Secretaries of Education have been fervent supporters of school choice, charter schools, and “higher standards”? You can call Common Core whatever you want. But it is the same everywhere, in every state. It is just a vessel to much bigger plans, a complete and utter transformation of society where the top will always be on the top, but true choice and upward mobility for the rest will be on the bottom. It is central to destroying who we are as a nation. A nation of freedom and free will. That will be stripped from us, forever. We will become the cradle to grave workforce with the rich and elite overlords looking down upon us. The future generations of today’s rich and elite who use their money and influence to reshape society to their mold.
This was going to happen no matter who won the Presidency. Clinton, Trump, Johnson, Stein… it didn’t matter. Who do you really think is running the show? Politicians? No. It is corporations. Follow the money. Read the stuff that is coming out right now through ESSA. Sift through the smoke and open your eyes America. And act. Do something. They have you fooled. Everyone is going nuts about Trump, both sides. Love or hate. Meanwhile, no one is talking about the WOIA bills in every state. Or the ed tech invasion happening in your schools. Or the shift towards getting rid of number grades towards the same type of scores on standardized tests. How many states are developing “Pathways” programs which shift education towards a pre-determined career rather than moving on to college? Trump doesn’t matter. Not in the long run. Neither did Clinton. This was going to happen before your very eyes.
Do you hear anyone, aside from student privacy groups, demanding Trump restore FERPA to pre-2008 and 2011 levels? No. Do you hear anyone making a big deal about the Bill Gates driven work group that is deciding data sharing at ALL levels? No. Do you know why? Because they are distracting you. And they are succeeding.
Someone wrote to me on Facebook today that to change things would require a rebellion. That person wasn’t promoting it. I am. It is what we need. And it has to happen now. Please share this article. Spread it. Make sure people see it and see the truth about what is happening. The reformers will say I am a conspiracy theorist. I will gladly take that. Because this is a vast conspiracy that has been playing out for decades. And they aren’t done yet. Time for a rebellion.
Out of all the people President Donald Trump could have picked for the United States Secretary of Education, why did it have to be Betsy DeVos? She supports Common Core, hates teacher unions, loves school choice, vouchers, and more of the same corporate education reform crap we’ve had to deal with in education for the past 15 years. She supports Right To Work laws, which she helped get through in Michigan. Her family is the heir to the Amway Corporation. The Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation started their own charter school in 2014, the West Michigan Aviation Academy. That’s all we need, is one of… them. Someone with big money thinking school choice and vouchers are the answers to everything. So much for Trump’s promise to get rid of Common Core. He is a liar. But I am not shocked.
As for the unions, this is going to be a looooong four years for them. According to Detroit News :
Speaking in July during a school choice forum at the Republican National Convention in Ohio, DeVos accused teachers unions of holding back innovation in education and called them “a formidable foe” at both state and national levels.
Both NEA and AFT should have picked Bernie Sanders in their endorsement for President. They jumped on the Hillary train and look where they are now? If they thought they had a tough time under President Obama, they haven’t seen anything yet! I have no doubt there will be some serious meetings for both organizations in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, every charter school cheerleader is probably doing cartwheels alongside the private school voucher advocates. Public education will not know what hit them. Meanwhile, we have Diane Ravitch backtracking on an earlier article she put up this week where she actually endorsed DeVos. She thought people would see it as a joke, but apparently they didn’t. A little too late Diane! Thanks for that…
One of the reasons I have always admired the Christina School District is because they don’t have magnet schools or choice schools within their district. That could change tomorrow night when the Christina Board of Education will vote on a proposal to expand the Honors program at Christiana High School from a 9th-12th grade program to a 6th-12th grade program. I understand the why behind it as the district has empty seats in some of their buildings and they will be forced to consolidate at some point. But this… I can’t get behind it.
Before I get into why I can’t support this, let me explain why they are doing it. Christina, over the past fifteen years, has lost a ton of students to charter schools. I truly believe the district wants to let go of the past and start offering richer programs to keep students in the district and to hopefully lure students back from the charters. As well, they are losing honors students to Dickinson High School in Red Clay who offers an International Baccalaureate program. Eventually, the Christina students in Wilmington issue will be resolved one way or another and Christina will lose those students. The district has to make some major changes if they want to survive in the next decade.
But this idea is not good. First off, I don’t think it is a wise idea to place middle school students in a high school setting. Developmentally, they are not on the same level playing field. By osmosis, these students will be exposed to things they are not ready for. There is a reason students in public education are at elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. To make matters worse, the plan would call for this to start with 6th graders only for the next school year and by 2019 all 6th-8th grade students participating in this program would be integrated as students at a high school. This cohort of 6th graders are going to have a very difficult time at a building with peers who are far older than them.
Furthermore, what happens when all the honors students leave the existing middle schools in the district? That will leave a higher concentration of students who have larger needs. Our current state accountability system for schools will place those schools with a bulls-eye on them when test scores come out. If anyone thinks the Every Student Succeeds Act is going to take care of that they are deluding themselves. It will set up an irreversible system of discrimination and segregation all over again, within their own district. That is something all schools in Delaware should be steering away from, not towards.
This program would have smaller “cohorts” which would mean smaller class sizes. I am all for that but it has to be done across the board. There are existing classrooms in elementary and middle schools that do not have enough support in this district but teachers are forced to handle large classrooms with no support whatsoever. But giving this preference to students who would most likely be considered talented and gifted while not giving those same choices to other students with just as much need if not more is just reinventing the discrimination wheel. I’m not saying talented and gifted students shouldn’t be given those benefits, but I am saying if that benefit exists it needs to happen for all students. No one wins in the large classroom scenario with one teacher.
The State of Delaware, and more specifically, the General Assembly, needs to look at the state school choice law. While the intent may have been honorable in the beginning, it has morphed into pockets of segregation across the state. Some are big and some are small, but they exist. While charter schools take the brunt of the shots fired at these practices, many districts are setting up programs within their own districts that are dividing students. Take the World Language Immersion program as an example. In my day, you took a language. They didn’t put a fancy name on it and start teaching Kindergartners Chinese or Spanish. While I do think it is good for students to learn a second language, and possibly a third depending on their abilities, we are already seeing school districts around the state dealing with issues of segregation between the smarter kids and those with higher needs based on this program. This isn’t even inequity, it is also inequality. When you have both, it is a recipe for disaster for the overall educational health of a state. This example is not just affecting New Castle County schools. Districts in Kent and Sussex County are having these issues as well. But their boards and administration don’t seem to be addressing what is happening within their own schools.
I don’t know what the solution is, but this isn’t it. I don’t understand why they wouldn’t attempt to instill those honors programs in the schools they have now. If they need to combine some schools and possibly sell old property that isn’t being used, that is one thing. But dividing students like this is a lesson Delaware doesn’t want to learn. This is a recommendation from the Superintendent (even though it is an Acting Superintendent). When Christina passed their referendum earlier this year one of their promises was to create programs like this. I am all for better programs in schools. But school choice has led to such severe competition among Delaware schools that future generations of adults are going to be more divided than ever between the haves and the have-nots. We have traditional school districts, charter schools, vo-techs, magnet schools, honors programs, World Immersion programs, and so forth. And I’m not even getting into the Pathways to Prosperity program and how that is setting up particular societal roles in the future.
How can we talk about equity in schools with a weighted funding system when we are forcing schools into that position? We are killing education in this state, one choice program at a time. I believe Christina is trying to rush a program like this into place. Let it marinate a bit. Look at other options. Slow your roll! I’m not convinced this isn’t a case where the Acting Superintendent who will be gone in a few months at most just wants a notch like this on his résumé. I think something this big would need to still be in the discussion stage with a new Superintendent who would be tasked to carry it out.
And in the name of all that is holy can we please get the words rigor or rigorous legally banned from discussion about education? As well, the word “Academy” in traditional school districts signifies something elite that only select students can get into. Not a smart idea to put an “Academy” into a school district.
To read the action item, which will be read for a second time, please go below.
John Oliver has become the voice of reason when it comes to education. He says what so many of us are thinking in our head. I was amazed at his expose on charter schools in August. We all saw his bit on standardized testing last year. And now he tackles the ugly topic of school segregation with simplistic ease. It is almost like he is coming out with campaign ads for reasons not to vote for Delaware Senator David Sokola!
Warning, these may NOT be safe for work!
We know a lot of school districts, charter schools, and state departments of education give a ton of money to Teach For America, but who got the group going? And who still funds them? Let’s just say it is a lot of organizations! Some of these foundations I had never heard of. Keep in mind, this is the corporate Teach For America. There might be foundations funding each state chapter. For example, the Rodel Foundation loves giving money to the Delaware TFA!
Richard Barth is the CEO of TFA, but Wendy Kopp, Barth’s wife, runs the show. But Barth runs the KIPP charter school chain.
Going from here, it is amazing how many connections between Teach For America, Kipp, the Gates Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, the NewSchools Venture Fund, the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, the Charter School Growth Fund, and Tom Vander Ark exist. It is important to know Vander Ark’s role in this because he is one of the biggest pushers for the death of traditional public schools through his competency-based education personalized learning career pathways earn to learn agendas.
I’ll be doing more of these. If any traditional school district unionized teacher isn’t very worried about their future, I would probably start doing something about it now. Unless you want to be working as a facilitator in an online charter school in 2026. This IS corporate education reform, but only a part of it. It goes much deeper than that. I’ve been telling people this for over two years now. But sometimes pictures say a lot more than words ever can.
The Delaware Dept. of Education will have three more Every Student Succeeds Act Community Engagement meetings in the next week. They held a meeting in Georgetown on Tuesday. The next three meetings will take place in Wilmington, Middletown, and Dover. The DOE is “requiring” participants to register through a company called Event Brite. Links to register can be found here.
I will stress with all the urgency I can muster that ALL public education parents attend these meetings. Before you go, I would familiarize yourself with the federal law. You can read the full text of the law here. It is a very long law with a lot of repeated jargon and “legalese” in it. The Delaware State Board of Education and Delaware DOE has put up many links to it on their websites, but a lot of that is open to interpretation. As well, U.S. Secretary of Education John King has issued “proposed rulemaking” which are potential regulations. These regulations are VERY controversial. You can read those regulations here and here.
These are my major concerns with ESSA:
By allowing states to have more flexibility, many states have already created long-term plans based on the prior federal mandates. Far too many in our state DOEs follow what the corporate education reformers want and give a false illusion of “stakeholder input”.
The Delaware DOE has given NO indication whatsoever that they will even consider changing the state standards away from Common Core even though they can certainly do this according to ESSA. The US Secretary of Education isn’t required to approve these standards. The states merely have to give an assurance that their standards will follow the law.
Student data still isn’t protected to parents satisfaction. To stop this data from going out, they need to restore the Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act (FERPA) to pre-2011 levels
Bouncing off the previous statement, by allowing more social service and health-based practitioners into our schools, there is a serious question regarding what applies to FERPA and what applies to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
John King’s regulations would keep the 95% participation rates for state assessments with consequences for schools and districts.
John King’s Title I regulations would enact a “supplement not supplant” these funds. This is in sharp contrast with federal law and he was called out on this the other day by the US House Education and Workforce Committee.
There is far too much talk of competency-based education through computer adaptive assessments. That is just lingo for personalized learning. This law would allow for classrooms to become online all the time. There are severe dangers with this in regards to the downgrading of the teacher profession, far too much screen time for students, and the quality of the educational material. As well as severe data privacy concerns. In fact, there are incentives for schools to adopt personalized learning.
While the law forbids the US DOE from forcing or coercing states to implement any state standards, like Common Core, many states already have these in place and spent years embedding them into every facet of public education.
The law calls for state accountability “report cards”, based on performance of the state assessment, but the tests are not required to be exactly the same for all students. So the state assessments are not a true measurement since they will be different for each test-taker. Delaware set up their report card last year under the name of the “Delaware School Success Framework” but they inserted a very punitive participation rate penalty if a school dips below the 95% participation rate which can’t use parent opt-out in those calculations according to the law.
State assessments will not be required to have questions at the appropriate grade level for students.
ESSA requires any plan to be submitted to the State DOE, State Board of Education, the Governor and the state legislature. To date, the Delaware DOE has not had “meaningful” consultation with the Delaware General Assembly about ESSA.
The law specifically states that all choice schools should have priority given to the lowest-achieving students, but Delaware allows for charter schools to have enrollment preferences that allow for higher-achieving students to have distinct advantages, especially in our magnet schools and charter schools like Charter School of Wilmington.
I have many other concerns with ESSA, but these ones stand out for me. I am coming at this from the perspective of a parent. I know educators have concerns over some of this as well.
I sent education surveys to all four of the candidates running for Delaware Governor. Three responded. I want to thank all the candidates for responding. Many of the questions I asked deal with the issues I write about on this blog. The survey was sent a few weeks ago, so recent events such as the district-charter funding issue and Blockchain aren’t in here.
These were tough questions in many areas and I challenged the candidates to do some research with some of them. In some areas, all three were in agreement and in others not so much. There were 32 questions overall, dealing with issues concerning teachers, special education, Common Core, Rodel, Markell, FOIA, the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission, the Every Student Succeeds Act, and more. Continue reading “32 Questions: Delaware Candidates For Governor On Education”
If Washington D.C. is the capital of America, than Delaware is the capital of corporate education reform.
Over the past week, many of us who are resisting the privatization of public education have been talking about The Ledger. Peter Greene broke the news for the world to see, which Diane Ravitch quickly picked up on. What is “The Ledger”? Continue reading “Jack Markell, Blockchain, Coding Schools, Rodel, BRINC, Pathways To Prosperity, Registered Agents… Delaware’s Role In “The Ledger””