All relationships have their ups and downs. Such is the case between former Kilroy’s Delaware commenter Publius e decere and former Pencader board member and current Christina board member Harrie Ellen Minnehan. Throw in a wild card like Henry Clampitt, former board member of Charter School of Wilmington, current board member at Gateway Lab School, and also a candidate for the Red Clay Consolidated Board of Education, and you have what I like to call a bizarre love triangle (which just so happens to be an awesome tune by New Order). But what I found this morning… that brings this triangle to a whole new level… Continue reading “The Bizarre Love Triangle Between Publius, Minnehan, and Clampitt **UPDATED**”
I hereby endorse Mike Matthews as President for the Delaware State Education Association.
I hereby endorse Jackie Kook as Vice-President for the Delaware State Education Association.
I’m not a teacher. Just a parent. But I have been very aware of DSEA the past few years and their role in education. To say that relationship has been frosty at times would be an understatement. I do not always agree with DSEA on issues. But when I heard Mike and Jackie were running a joint ticket for DSEA leadership, I immediately rooted for them. And then Danny Rufo announced his candidacy as President. So I was torn for a long time. I’ve known all three of these educators since shortly after I started blogging in 2014. Danny is awesome. But Mike and Jackie bring many battle scars to these roles. Battles fought at the Delaware DOE and Legislative Hall. Fought in front of cameras as they loudly advocated for teacher, student, and parent rights. To me, they are more of a voice for teachers than the current leadership at DSEA. They know the players and they know who to watch out for.
I get that these leadership roles change people. You can’t just say whatever you want. I don’t know Frederika Jenner very well at all. But I do know Mike and Jackie. I know Danny. Crouse and Ingraham, endorsed by Jenner, just seem to be missing something. I can’t pinpoint it. Maybe it’s the fact that I have never seen them before. Maybe it’s because when I asked three of the candidates their thoughts about student data privacy, the Matthews/Kook team and Rufo genuinely and thoughtfully answered. Crouse and Ingraham gave some robotic Facebook response. When I asked for more, they endorsed not getting into Facebook “battles” and having off-line conversations. Sorry, Delaware has suffered immensely from those kind of talks. The fourth candidate, Dom, I couldn’t pick out of a line-up. No offense Dom!
What the package of Mike and Jackie could bring to Delaware education is a dream team beyond compare. They know the issues. They have great ideas on how to address those issues. I’ve heard some say they are worried about Mike’s ability to “go along to get along”. I firmly believe Mike will bring his A-game to the role and not put aside the issues he has fought for much longer than I have. If there were a way to have co-Presidents AND a vice-president, I would say throw Rufo on that triumvirate! But with the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act and some crazy stuff coming up in education, Delaware’s largest teacher association needs people who will look at every angle. Who aren’t afraid to go outside of the box for help. Who will fight not just for teachers, but also what our students need. The symbiotic relationship between teacher and student is a relationship like no other. Teachers have had it rough. But I think because of that fight, many in DSEA leadership have capitulated towards those in favor of corporate education reform to the detriment of that symbiotic relationship.
Between vouchers, personalized learning in a digital environment (which is the gravest threat to teachers in my opinion), and more charter school enrollment going up, the teacher unions have never been more vulnerable than they are right now. They need a very strong shield, and Mike and Jackie are it! So I urge every single member of DSEA to vote for Mike and Jackie on January 9th. Don’t wait, vote that day. Some will say a non-DSEA person should mind their own business and not get involved. Too bad. Freedom of the press baby! Don’t like it? Too bad. At least I’m not making fake Facebook accounts trying to start trouble. I will leave that right there.
Some will say I am only endorsing Mike and Jackie because I’m friends with them. I’m friends with Danny too. And do you want to know what drew me to all three of them in the first place? Education. If I never started blogging I wouldn’t know the first thing about any of this. But this is the world I live in.
To date, three Delaware educators have announced their intention to run for President of the Delaware State Education Association. All three have announced this on Facebook. I know two of them, but I haven’t met the other candidate. Two of the candidates are running on a ticket with a Vice-President candidate. Who are these brave souls? Continue reading “DSEA President Battle Heats Up As Three Vie For The Top Spot”
We know a lot of school districts, charter schools, and state departments of education give a ton of money to Teach For America, but who got the group going? And who still funds them? Let’s just say it is a lot of organizations! Some of these foundations I had never heard of. Keep in mind, this is the corporate Teach For America. There might be foundations funding each state chapter. For example, the Rodel Foundation loves giving money to the Delaware TFA!
Richard Barth is the CEO of TFA, but Wendy Kopp, Barth’s wife, runs the show. But Barth runs the KIPP charter school chain.
Going from here, it is amazing how many connections between Teach For America, Kipp, the Gates Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, the NewSchools Venture Fund, the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, the Charter School Growth Fund, and Tom Vander Ark exist. It is important to know Vander Ark’s role in this because he is one of the biggest pushers for the death of traditional public schools through his competency-based education personalized learning career pathways earn to learn agendas.
I’ll be doing more of these. If any traditional school district unionized teacher isn’t very worried about their future, I would probably start doing something about it now. Unless you want to be working as a facilitator in an online charter school in 2026. This IS corporate education reform, but only a part of it. It goes much deeper than that. I’ve been telling people this for over two years now. But sometimes pictures say a lot more than words ever can.
If Washington D.C. is the capital of America, than Delaware is the capital of corporate education reform.
Over the past week, many of us who are resisting the privatization of public education have been talking about The Ledger. Peter Greene broke the news for the world to see, which Diane Ravitch quickly picked up on. What is “The Ledger”? Continue reading “Jack Markell, Blockchain, Coding Schools, Rodel, BRINC, Pathways To Prosperity, Registered Agents… Delaware’s Role In “The Ledger””
Teacher Salaries. This is the bulk of the costs in education. As it should be. Teachers are the lifeblood of a child’s education. The funding for teachers should always be the highest cost for any school, whether it is in a district school or a charter school. With that being said, below are what our districts and charter schools pay for teachers. But as with the article on overall spending, it is all in relation to how many students a district or charter has. There are several opinions that can be drawn from these pictures, but as with all these articles, the percentage of high-needs students can play a huge factor, especially when it comes to special education. But we can see, based on the numbers, that having too many new teachers may save money in the short-term but it doesn’t bode well for students.
With this article, we have the first charter schools to suffer from what I call BAP: Bad Accounting Practices. Delaware Military Academy and Delaware College Prep are not included in this because it would be impossible to figure out their teacher salaries. For the sole reason that they put ALL their salaries under a code of “General Salaries”. There is no breakdown of teacher, principal, head of school, secretaries, and so forth. I know their authorizer, Red Clay, has approached them about this with absolutely no change whatsoever. And Del. Military Academy already had a run-in with the State Auditor a few years back over personal spending. Del. College Prep had their charter revoked by the Red Clay board and closed at the end of June.
Before you react to the first picture, I would like to remind everyone that the number of students in each district is the biggest factor in all of this. Some district and charter accounting gurus may look at these and think I have all my numbers wrong. If they are looking at just the state code that falls under teacher salaries, most of them would be right. But for the purposes of this article and to get a true understanding of how teachers are paid overall in our districts and charters, I added the following together to come up with the teacher salaries: teacher salaries, academic excellence (essentially a bonus for some teachers), what are known as Extra Pay for Extra Responsibility categories (Sports, Extra-Curricular, and Misc.), Visiting Teachers, and the three Related Services for special education that only about half the districts use for special education teachers (Basic, Intensive, and Complex). There is absolutely no way to determine how many teachers are tenured or have more experience at each district or charter. But these are straight-out salaries and do not include benefits or pensions. That will come soon, but there is a specific reason why I am not including this with the regular salaries. As well, based on this information, there is no way to calculate how many teachers are in each district or charter.
For the most part, district teacher salaries fall in line with how many students are in each district, with only some slight variances between a few districts, and nothing that put them more than one spot ahead or below another district. Christina cut a lot of teachers after their referenda from FY2015 failed. So their numbers could be higher next year since their referendum did pass this year and they restored most of the teaching positions. Not every district has “academic excellence” bonus money they give to teachers. A lot of these funds come from grants based on AP and advanced classes. Districts that did not give any funds to teachers for “academic excellence” are Caesar Rodney, Colonial, Indian River, Laurel, Seaford, Woodbridge and Sussex Tech. Brandywine and Appoquinimink led the pack with these bonuses, with $3.1 and $2.6 million given to teachers in each district. Christina only had $784 in academic excellence, which leads me to believe something was either miscoded or carried over from the prior year.
With almost twice the amount of students as Odyssey, it would stand to reason that Newark Charter School would be number one on this graph. We do see more variances among the charters for teacher spending than exists for the districts. Charter school teachers in Delaware are not part of teacher unions so collective bargaining does not play a role in their salary negotiations. What concerns me the most are Freire and Great Oaks which I will go into more detail a bit later. All of the charter schools that just opened a little less than a year ago came in last for teacher salaries. Newer charters tend to get less experienced teachers who are new to the profession. This can cause severe growing pains for new charters. In fact, out of the seven charters that opened in the past few years, all are in the bottom half when it comes to teacher salaries.
This is where the pictures change drastically. New Castle County Vo-Tech takes the number one spot. Followed by a district in Sussex County. The top two districts for teacher spending overall, Red Clay and Christina, come in 6th and 8th on this based on the teacher salaries divided by the number of students in the district. Once again, there is a very direct correlation between how vo-techs are funded and how much they are able to spend. By not relying on referenda and worrying about local funding, they experience much more freedom than traditional school districts. It must be nice to be a line item on the state budget!
With charters, we see a vast amount of difference between teacher salaries divided by the number of students in each school. For schools that have been around for a long time, like Thomas Edison, Academy of Dover, and Family Foundations, they have very low teacher salaries per student. Especially since they serve some high-need populations. Either they are paying too little in teacher salaries, there is high turnover, or a combination of both. On the flip side, how Prestige Academy has the highest teacher salary per student amount in the state, at $6,544 baffles me. My guess, which will come up in future articles, is they are putting other salaries in with teacher salaries. Another BAP at play. Freire, at $1573 a student, and Great Oaks, at an incredibly low $1175 a student, is almost unbelievable. Either they are miscoding salaries or they do not have enough certified teachers. Are they utilizing programs like Teach For America and Relay Graduate School too much? Those programs have very high turnover compared to regular teachers. These are also high schools, which makes me worried about the post-graduate outcomes of these students. And no, I don’t mean based on Smarter Balanced Assessment scores. Not many charters give “academic excellence” funds to teachers. Only Newark Charter School and Campus Community do this in larger amounts, while Positive Outcomes and Kuumba do this in very low amounts.
In this last graph, I took the teacher salaries divided by the student count for each charter or district and then divided that by the total per student count. Sadly, the percentage of cost per student going towards teacher salaries appears to be 7% for Great Oaks. I would say any charter or district below 25% is not good. If at least a quarter of spending in schools isn’t going towards teachers, there are most likely some issues. By the same token, if the amount is too high, like with the four charters at the top, something probably isn’t being coded right in the state accounting system.
Once again, I will reiterate that these amounts are based on expenditures by particular accounting codes during FY2016 for Delaware school districts and charter schools as reported by the state. This information is put into the Delaware accounting system by each district or charter school. In certain situations, I can only surmise what might be going on. They are supposed to follow certain codes, but none of them do it by the book. And with little or no oversight by our state, they get away with it. I believe in local control, but there are certain things, in the name of transparency and best practices, that dictate a uniformity, and education spending is at the top of that list!
A blog called NYC Public School Parents published the results of a survey about testing and opt out a couple of days ago. The findings were a bit bizarre in my opinion. The fact that it came from Achieve Inc. is very troubling. For the past couple years, maybe longer, parents have been opting their children out of the state assessment. That’s a good thing. But the fact that Achieve Inc. would publish findings that show parents are presumably getting sick of testing and more suburban moms know about opt out is a bit of a farce in my opinion. At this point, Achieve wants you to opt out. They want you to complain about too much testing. They want you, the parents of America, to make such a loud noise that the feds and the states will be forced to change testing environments. Yes, one of the biggest corporate education reform companies in America is finally in agreement with what we’ve been saying all along! Finally! But guess what… this was the plan all along.
If you are royally confused, follow me. Achieve Inc. helped to set up the Common Core, way back when. There are some who say they took the work of the Common Core steering committees, ditched it, and came up with their own set of standards. You know how so many people say “Common Core sucks” and “It’s federal intrustion” and all that stuff? They are right. I believe it was intentionally designed to be messed up. And the tests based off it, like the Smarter Balanced Assessment and PARCC? They were designed to be bad tests. No one will say this officially. But they wanted enough parents to opt out to make some noise. Not a full-blown, everyone opts out noise. But enough to draw attention to the subject of assessments. And they responded. Florida, Delaware, and many other states conducted Assessment Inventories. In Delaware, ours was initiated by, who else, Achieve Inc. These inventories served a double purpose. It kept the subject of “too many assessments” in the minds of those who followed this type of thing. It also helped to stop some states from moving forward with opt out legislation. I’ve seen a Delaware Department of Education email stating our Senate Joint Resolution #2 was a solution against opt out.
You’re still confused. I understand. It’s hard to explain this in any way that makes sense. The Common Core-High Stakes Testing era of corporate education reform is coming to an end. Very soon. But that was just a phase. It allowed the states to get all their data systems in place. It allowed career & technical education initiatives to get their start. But the biggest thing Common Core and the state assessments did was open the door to something else. We are now entering the next phase and the groundwork was laid a long time ago.
Welcome to the Competency-Based Education era! Instead of your child advancing through grade levels, they will now advance once they master the material. Don’t get me wrong. The state assessments will still be there. But parents most likely won’t even know when their child is taking it. Because it won’t be the same test. It won’t be students cooped up taking the same test over a period of weeks in the Spring. It will be all year. The same tests, that we have loved to hate, they will still be here. They may tweak them up a bit, but they aren’t going anywhere. They laid the trap, and we all fell in it.
How is this even possible? Through modern technology. Through personalized learning. Don’t be fooled by the term personalized learning. There are actually two kinds. The concept has been around for decades. More one-on-one instruction from teachers, personalized on that student’s strengths and weaknesses. A very humanistic approach which I don’t have an issue with. But what the corporate education pirates want is the same thing, but take out the teacher. Substitute it with technology. With computers, and the internet, and cloud-based systems, and blended learning. The teachers will still be there, but they won’t be the in front of the classroom teachers anymore. They will facilitate, and guide the students through what the computer is teaching them. Some states may push back a bit on this, and compromise with a blended learning system, which is a mix of both. But make no mistake, the eventual destination is the demise of teacher unions and public education as we know it.
So if public education is gone, will we all have to pay for private school? We kind of already are. They are called charter schools. The first one opened up in the early 1990s. It has been a slow invasion ever since. Even though charters represent less than a quarter of the schools in America, they have gained such a foothold in America that their supporters have overshadowed those who oppose them. Charter schools, no matter what anyone tells you, are not public schools. They don’t operate the same, and they aren’t held accountable in the same ways. In charter heavy states, the laws have been written so they get a little bit more of this, a little bit less of that. They are corporations. With bylaws and boards that aren’t elected by the people, but among themselves. Many of them are non-profit organizations, while some of the chains are very much for profit. But they are not held to the same standards as regular schools. Those that are horrible wind up shutting down. These usually surround incapable buffoons who decide to steal from the kitty and get rich quick. These idiots usually get caught, at one point or another. They are non-union, and teachers don’t have the same protections as public school teachers. But we pay for charter schools.
When you pay a local school district with your school taxes, they have to send part of those funds to the charter schools. Any student from that district who attends a charter school? You are paying for them to go there. It comes out of a district’s local funds. You send that proportion of the students costs to the charter. There are different buckets of money where your school taxes go. Some go towards buildings and repairs. But a lot of them go to the actual student’s share of the pie. And if they go to a charter, those funds follow them. As a result, some school districts are left with much less funds over they years. And since some charters like to pick and choose who they get, even though getting them to admit it is a lesson in futility, they take the better kids from the school districts. Leaving the school districts with the harder to reach kids. The ones who the charters don’t want. If you think lotteries are really random, think again. Some have very carefully worded interviews, some do kindergarten screenings, and some even have actual pre-acceptance tests. They don’t want regular school districts anymore, and they are openly at war with public education. They like to throw out that their enemies are the oppressors and they are the victims. I hear this rhetoric a lot. But it’s the whole chicken and the egg scenario. But in this case, one did come first and the other has been like locusts swarming on public education as we know it. They have the backing of billionaires. Those billionaires set up the funds for them, through shell companies all over the country. Even the feds are in on it. So what does any of that have to do with testing?
The way things are now, the full-scale privatization of American schools can’t possibly move forward with the blessing of the teacher unions. But they can infiltrate those unions, and slowly but surely get them to move over to their side of thinking. We see it all the time. The National Education Association just finished up their annual representative assembly down in D.C. One of the biggest topics was charter schools. Hillary Clinton gave a speech to the NEA members and when she mentioned charters, she got booed. But behind the scenes, there were several new business items different members of the NEA introduced. Controversial business items. Ones that called out the leadership for cavorting with the enemy. Ones that called for less testing and less labeling and punishing. The ones leadership wanted, they passed. The ones they didn’t were either defeated or bundled up and sent to a committee. Where they will most likely never be heard from again. Not in their current form at least. Far too many in the teacher unions are well aware they are under attack but their defensive posture is “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em!” That Kumbaya seat at the table is a red herring. It will be a feast. A feast of crows and vultures picking at the bones of public education.
Every time the unions give in, every time they give up just that one little piece of what used to be theirs, they are dying a slow death. They incorporate the education reformers ideas and then you start hearing talk about “the whole child” and “community centers”. And how there is too much testing, and we need to support that idea. As our school districts try to become community centers, they won’t realize it is a losing proposition. It is an unsustainable effort, unless they get help. That help will come from outside organizations. Like the United Way, and foundations, and those who are dedicated to helping the plight of low-income and minority children. The civil rights organizations will say Yes, Yes, Yes! Money will flow all over the place. The districts will think they have it made. Add more pre-school! Bring them in as early as possible. We have grant money flowing. We won’t have to pay for it. Who cares about the charters, we have tons of money. Until they don’t. And that’s when they pull the plug. Who is this “they” I speak of? All those outside companies, the states, the feds and their grant money. It will run out. The districts won’t even see the man behind the curtain until it is too late.
Districts who promised parents they would take care of their children will all of a sudden, in a blink of an eye, go bankrupt. The states will take them over. They already did it in some cities with testing and accountability schemes crafted by random luck or things like Race To The Top. Those schools became, you guessed it, charter schools. But this will be much more epic in scope. It will be called the end of public education. Schools that over-borrowed to become what the education reformers wanted them to be, all under the guise of the Every Student Succeeds Act. So what happens to the teachers? The ones that are still in the profession by that point? The ones who haven’t jumped ship because of the stringent regulations and accountability schemes? And the evaluations based on the high-stakes tests that companies like Achieve Inc. now want parents to opt out of? By this time, the personalized digital learning empire will be in full swing. The state assessment will be broken up into chunks at the end of each learning chapter. For students taking the online Social Studies class, for example, they will take the state assessment portion of the Civil War chapter one week, and a month later they will get the one on The Reconstruction. Or maybe two months later depending on how not proficient some of those students are. How quickly they can grasp the concepts. By this time, most of those who fought the reformers will either give in and settle into their facilitator role or will have left the profession.
With the testing, don’t be shocked at all if you hear one name coming up a lot. That would be Questar. They are NOT their own company. They are owned by American Institutes for Research (AIR), the un-credited creator of the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Yeah, I know, the states made it! And I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’m willing to sell to you as well. They have their hooks in quite a few states, the most recent being New York and Tennessee. The PARCC test got the most bad press and AIR took advantage of that. So your kid will take the smaller high-stakes test which will also be an end-of-unit test. Which will also determine students’ class grades. Will parents be able to opt out of that? It was one thing when the tests didn’t mean anything. Now they will mean everything! But it doesn’t stop there. Because everything will be online and through cloud services, that means all your kid’s data is being meticulously tracked. All the way down to how long it takes them to type something. The “researchers” will use this data to determine what the best career your child will “do best” at when they are older. Career pathways, beginning at the very youngest of ages. Probably in pre-school with the latest screams to get more of that going. It all looks great on paper, and they want you to think it’s great. It’s how they will own your child. The future corporate America. Education won’t be education anymore. It will be a high-tech recruiting facilitator-led community-centered we own your kid once we get our hooks into them. And if all of this isn’t enough, they will bet on the results through social impact bonds. And get paid for their perceived success margins. Companies. Your child is a profit center, but your kid won’t see any of the results except the ultimate Big Brother.
Any parent, teacher, or student needs to speak up NOW.
Tonight, a Delaware charter school refused parents the ability to record their board meeting. A group of parents attended the Academia Antonia Alonso Board of Directors meeting to give public comment about what they felt was unfair termination of many teachers at the school. They wanted to record the meeting but were told they could not. Even though charter schools are technically corporations, they still have to abide by public meeting laws in Delaware. And in Delaware, all you have to do is advise someone you are recording a meeting. You do not need their consent.
Charter schools in Delaware are not unionized, therefore they can hire and fire at will without any protection whatsoever for the teachers. While one would hope charter administrators use a common sense approach in making these decisions, some charters have been known for running their schools like a dictatorship. Some charters have fired a teacher over something as small as questioning a policy. When this happens as often as it has at Academia Antonia Alonso this school year, sooner or later parents will begin to notice and question it themselves. What charter boards fail to understand is they wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for a parent’s ability to make a choice. What kind of message does that send when a parent is denied the simple freedom of recording a meeting when they don’t even need their consent?
House Bill 61, the school board recording bill, is awaiting a full vote by the Delaware Senate. It passed the Delaware House last year. Since then, many reports have come out about charter school fraud. The bill is a no-brainer! This is just another reason why this bill needs to pass. Denying a parent of a choice is never a smart thing to do, especially when it comes to education. For a parent to even attend a board meeting is a feat in itself. They should be happy they have parent engagement. I can only think of one reason a board wouldn’t want a public meeting to be heard. And it isn’t because they don’t want parents to hear a great meeting. They don’t want something getting out. While the school did allow the parents to give public comment at two minutes each, will their concerns be put in the board minutes for the meeting?
What makes this more interesting is the amount of parent input they had for their recent major modification that passed the Delaware State Board of Education last week. They had to solicit parents to comment on that publicly. But when the parent’s want to talk about something the school doesn’t want out there, they don’t want the public to hear that.
Academia Antonia Alonso currently resides in the Community Education Building in Wilmington. The State Board of Education approved their major modification request to move to one of the buildings owned by Odyssey Charter School at Barley Mill Plaza. The charter school has gone through three heads of school since they opened in August of 2014, in less than two years. They were placed on formal review before they even opened based on low enrollment. They got out of formal review with a probation and got their enrollment up to what their charter was approved for. In the 2014-2015 Charter School Performance Framework, the school met the standard for their financial framework but was labeled as does not meet standard for their organizational framework.
When our schools going to learn that if you try to silence parents in any way, sooner or later they will organize. Teachers in traditional school districts already have the capability to organize through their unions. Perhaps charter school teachers should as well to avoid these administrators who seem to think ruling with an iron fist is the right thing to do.
This is an urgent message to every single public school teacher in America. You need to fight for your jobs. That’s right. You need to STOP this ESEA bill coming to a vote on Wednesday. If you don’t, it will weigh on your conscience when all the bad stuff in the bill is implemented and you have even less control than you do now. This legislation actually changes the future of teaching. You will no longer be a teacher, giving instruction to your students. You will become a data coach. A facilitator. Is this what you want? If it is, then you can certainly stay the course. If you want to stand around while children are plugged into computers all day and you base your very brief interaction with students on what will amount to a corporate written script, then stay the course. But I urge you to read this legislation when it is made public tomorrow. You need to act fast once you do. Call your Congress representatives immediately if you do not think this is a good thing.
You have been under-minded by numerous companies and “leaders” in America. Between No Child Left Behind, Common Core, Race To The Top, VAM, Standardized Testing, and so forth. Are you really going to sit back and let this happen again? You have a voice. A very powerful voice. Use it. And not through the lips of your leaders. Use your own voices. But do it now before it is too late.
Just because your union presidents are endorsing this sham of an education bill does not mean you have to. This bill is designed solely for the corporate education reformers. The very same ones who pushed VAM and hardcore evaluations on you. If you want to see the escalation of more money going out to companies instead of your classrooms, than doing nothing or endorsing this bill is your best course of action. But if you believe that this is not education, but a nightmare being inflicted on kids and teachers, than you need to get on the phone, email, social media and any way or method you have to put a stop to this bill.
I am sure many of you are thinking “It’s no use. There is nothing I can do.” If you have that attitude, you are absolutely right. But there are many of you fighting this fight and using their voice. They will not quit. They will not let public education be destroyed by greed and corruption. If you truly believe in public education, then you need to fight. And even if you like some parts of this bill, you need to nuke the whole package with your voice. All of you.
For those reading this who have no clue who I am, I will tell you. I’m just a dad. A very angry and upset father who has watched the fall of education happen before my very eyes. I watched it affect my own son with disabilities in the worst ways possible. I acted. I researched. I dove in to the data and the very diabolical events happening at my state’s Department of Education. I saw how they pushed stuff through that was damaging to teachers and students and schools with no one the wiser. I got wise. I made it my mission to upset their plans as much as humanly possible. I speak because so many of you can’t. But it has reached a point where those of us who are fighting the good fight need you to rise. If you have to march on your state capital or actually drive to D.C., do it. Use social media as your weapon pointed right at those who would disrespect you and destroy what you enjoy. But for the love of public education, do something!
You don’t have time to do nothing. It is 11:59 on the public education doomsday clock!
The above picture was originally on Amazing Stories Mag