Sokola Ebola Vs. Right To Work: Which Is The Bigger Danger To Education?

Sunday evening I put up a post about a political ad for Delaware Senator David Sokola.  You would have thought I sent a cannonball into a church picnic with the reaction this post got.  In a nutshell, the Delaware State Education Association did not endorse the Chair of the Senate Education Committee, David Sokola.  He has been the chair of this committee for decades.  This was a very clear statement that DSEA no longer has faith in Senator David Sokola when it comes to education.  But unbeknownst to many, DSEA is also part of a PAC with various other Delaware unions that paid for an advertisement for Sokola’s 8th District Senate campaign.  I wasn’t happy to see this and many others weren’t as well.  I linked Frederika Jenner, the President of DSEA, to this PAC because her name appears on their website.

Before I knew it, teachers who are very supportive of DSEA jumped to their defense.  One of them, Mike Matthews, who used to be President of the Red Clay Educations Association and is currently campaigning for Jenner’s spot next January, wrote a very long comment about why Right To Work is dangerous in the current Delaware political landscape.

Before I get to Matthews’ comment, I want to briefly explain what Right To Work is.  Basically, it would prevent a worker from paying union dues but they would get the union benefits.  This has been implemented in some states but the Delaware General Assembly has thwarted this from happening here.  Delaware Senate Minority Leader Greg Lavelle has been very supportive of Right To Work in Delaware.  Not every Delaware Republican is 100% behind a complete Right To Work state, much less with DSEA.  Matthews’ comment suggests that Right To Work is a bigger danger than very bad Dave Sokola education policy.

Here’s where I stand on this and, as always, I thank Kevin for providing the forum to discuss!

DSEA did not vote to endorse Sen. Sokola for his re-election campaign. As someone who has consistently received DSEA’s endorsement in years’ past, this is obviously big news. I have had many concerns — and shared them publicly — with Sen. Sokola’s positions on education. I think many others have, as well. And that’s why DSEA chose the route it did during the election season this year.

But — and this really is a big BUT — folks need to realize that we are a union whose main goal is to activate and organize its membership. We have seen union membership in many states decrease dramatically because of nasty Right to Work laws. These laws severely weaken the ability of local unions to do the work they need to do — advocate for members and students.

The threat of Right to Work is very much real here in Delaware. If the Democrats lose just two seats in the Senate, then it’s very likely that Republicans will demand legislation that could repress labor rights in exchange for getting YES votes on the budget. If the Republican Senate REFUSES to pass a budget because they are demanding more restrictions on organized labor, then my guess is the Democrats in the House will cave so they can get a budget passed. That’s the reality of the situation that we’re dealing with.

DSEA’s membership in the Delawareans First PAC is borne out of the need to fight back any effort for Right to Work to land in Delaware. DSEA’s participation in this PAC is very much about ensuring our own survival SO WE CAN continue to advocate for our members, students, and schools.

And there are some very clear differences between the two major-party candidates in the 8th Senate District when it comes to labor rights. Sen. Sokola is vehemently anti-Right to Work. Meredith Chapman has stated her support of the collective bargaining process, but can’t say unequivocally that she would be anti-Right to Work. And, as I’ve said to her, should she get elected and the GOP take the Senate, her ability to negotiate with a newly-emboldened GOP leadership will be severely diminished and she will have to walk lock-step with the caucus on these issues.

So, while many of our members — and myself included — have serious issues with Sen. Sokola’s education positions, we have to realize that we are still a union. And it’s our business to maintain our membership and attempt to stave off any threats to that membership. I am completely able to see both sides here and while Sen. Sokola hasn’t been the best friend on education issues, he’s unwaveringly a friend on the topic of Right to Work. To condemn him from all angles because of his education positions (no matter how large those issues are) would be unfair.

DSEA’s membership in this PAC is voluntary, of course, but in the interest of solidarity, it’s imperative that we union brothers and sisters come together and support candidates who will repel Right to Work — even if it means supporting a candidate we oppose on other issues. Because if Right to Work comes to Delaware — which could happen if the Senate swings GOP — then our ability to be an effective agent for change will be severely dampened. And that could have consequences that hasten all the negative things we know have been coming down the education pike for years that you have thankfully been reporting on with such fervor.

I just think it’s important to realize that I think it’s completely within bounds to have severe disagreements with candidates on certain issues, but to find common ground on others, especially issues that relate to the survival of organizations that I would hope are seen as positive players in the education arena like DSEA.

Thank you, again, for the opportunity to share my thoughts here.

So suppose the Republicans gain control of the Delaware Senate and there is a budget impasse next year (as there seems to be almost every year).  Does that automatically make Delaware a Right To Work state?  We just don’t know.  I can picture a scenario where, if it were that bad, certain concessions could take place.  Last week at the Carney-Bonini debate, the subject of Right To Work zones was brought up.  That would not make the whole state a Right To Work place, but for certain companies.  Auto manufacturing was brought up as an example.  But I personally don’t believe the General Assembly would make DSEA a Right To Work organization.  If they did gain control of the Senate, that would last as long as one General Assembly if they did that.  The General Assembly is always on a cycle of campaigning every two years.  Any legislator who voted for Right To Work would automatically lose any future endorsement from DSEA.  Many do not want to face that prospect in the coming years.  Delaware is a small state and its citizens have more access to their Senators and State Representatives than they do in other states.  A Republican controlled Senate would also have to contend with a Democrat controlled House and, by all indications, Democrat Governor John Carney.  Would the Republicans wait around all summer in an attempt to get Right To Work passed if a budget was held up?  I highly doubt it.  Most legislators are at the point of collapse after an all-night session bridging June 30th to July 1st.

While I will certainly say I do not know how many teacher jobs DSEA has actively protected over the years, I imagine it is quite a bit.  Charter school teachers, which are supported heavily by Delaware Republicans, do not presently have teacher unions.  But I firmly believe Senator Sokola is, at a much greater degree, a bigger threat to Delaware teachers than a potential Right To Work law in Delaware.  He has 25 years of experience showing exactly what he has done to Delaware education and the teaching profession.  And judging by the first draft of Delaware’s state plan for the Every Student Succeeds Act, I don’t see that situation changing any time soon.

I firmly believe Sokola serves interests much bigger than any Democrat platform.  He serves those who profit immensely off students and teachers.  He represents the corporations who want to reform education so they can make more money.  But more dangerous, is the very real threat of how these changes in education will eventually transform society as a whole.  It is my contention that whether Right To Work happened or not, the teaching profession union members across the country fight for every day will be gone one day.  At the rate where are going, everything will be online instruction and teachers will just be glorified moderators if those classrooms are even in brick and mortar schools.  The more we let outside organizations into our schools, the ability for decisions to be decided at a local level diminishes greatly.  That is what Sokola represents.  He takes the side of a particular charter school in his district and he will do whatever is necessary to make sure they look good at the expense of the district around him.  If he didn’t have the power he currently has as the Chair of the Senate Education Committee, that would be one thing.  But that taint in his decision-making policy affects every single public school in the state.

In my eyes, as a parent and a Delaware citizen, David Sokola needs to go.  By any means necessary.  I fully endorse Meredith Chapman for the 8th Senate District.  Even if I was a die-hard Democrat and never voted out of party lines, I would make this one exception.  He is that bad.  Do I trust David Sokola to be anti-Right To Work because he truly believes it would be bad for unions or because he knows if he isn’t he would have a hard time getting re-elected in his district with various unions supporting him?  I would go with the latter.  But there comes a time when you have to weed out the rot.  That time is now.  We have had enough Sokola Ebola in Delaware education.  This is a guy who lied in a debate last week.  How can anyone trust him to do the right thing when he lies when the truth would be far better for him?  That is how desperate he has become.  For the first time in 25 years, he knows he may not enter Legislative Hall as a FOIA-protected legislator.  He is scared.  In a microscopic way, down to the molecular level, I feel bad for him in that respect.  But it stops there.  In politics, you reap what you sow.  And what David Sokola has sown over a quarter of a century is dangerous for every single citizen of Delaware.

As I am writing this, the AFLCIO President, James Maravelias just wrote a comment supporting Matthews’ stance on this issue.  To this I can only reply with the following: by allowing Right To Work in Delaware, the unions believe they will lose all their collective bargaining rights.  As a parent, we didn’t seem to have a choice when Senator Sokola, the corporate education reformer led Delaware DOE, and Governor Markell brought Common Core to Delaware.  When a once a year test became the measurement for all Delaware schools.  When our General Assembly passed laws allowing for more charter schools in the state which drained resources out of many school districts.  When special education took a back-seat to standards.  When teachers spent an exorbitant amount of time on professional development during school days.  When our collective voice said “We don’t want our children to take this test”, the DSEA supported an assessment inventory that ultimately led to no real change.  Even when I begged them not to and that it would weaken the parent voice for opt out legislation.  And it worked.  DSEA sheepishly and almost after the fact supported an override of the Governor’s veto but not without my having a tirade of epic proportions that actually caused me to burn some bridges.  I didn’t see DSEA’s collective bargaining power at play when disaster happened at the hands of David Sokola with their own teacher evaluation bill.  One man was able to turn the wishes of the entire DSEA into his playground and he got what he wanted.

Parents are consistently left out of the equation when it comes to education.  Sure, we get our placards on this committee or that task force, but we don’t have the ability to collectively bargain our way out of things we know are bad for our kids.  The majority of the decisions are made those who represent some type of profession in education or a company that will somehow profit off it.  I’m not saying this to bash unions, but to illustrate a point.  Any union is, on its face, going to have a priority of protecting their membership.  I get that.  Just as a baked bean company would be all about making great baked beans.  But when one guy wants to branch off and make different kind of baked bean products that diminish the entire line, that is a big problem.  Even when the research comes back that fully states: this new product isn’t worth a hill of beans, the one guy makes it happen.  That is Senator Sokola in Delaware.

As a final thought, in June of 2015, a Delaware parent openly questioned and challenged Sokola during a Senate Education Committee meeting on opt out.  When Sokola lost his cool and showed the true David Sokola, he told the parent that if she thought she could do a better job herself to run for office.  While this citizen was not able to run for Sokola’s seat, another citizen rose up to the challenge.  Would she have run if Sokola didn’t make a mockery out of parents over opt out?  We will never know.  But perhaps it planted a seed that could begin to bloom next week.  We may not know what kind of plant will grow next year, but it has to be better than the out of control and choking poison ivy that tarnishes every facet of education Sokola touches.  This is why I can’t personally stomach the thought of Sokola sitting in Legislative Hall in 2017.  And nothing, not even a potential threat of Right To Work, could get me to change my mind on that.  Perhaps Frederika Jenner wasn’t fully supportive of paying for a Sokola political ad as a member of the board of Delawarean’s First PAC.  But attaching her name to it sent ripple effects throughout the state in the past 44 hours.  Delaware education won’t change for the better until David Sokola is gone.

As a parent, my top priority is to make sure my child gets the best education possible.  As a parent, I can clearly see how Sokola policy has affected my child and 133,000 other children in Delaware.  I don’t see how a threat of Right To Work has affected these kids.  Perhaps it could become a future danger, but the Defcon-4 danger to education that is happening right now, in real-time, is David Sokola.  He must go.  I understand Mike Matthews and his perception of a Republican Senate as a danger.  But it is not something that would automatically come to pass.  We have years and years of watching Sokola operate.  I’m not running out telling every Delaware citizen to vote Republican in the Senate.  Nor am I doing that for any election this year.  But I would be remiss as a parent, a father, a husband, a supporter of public education, a supporter of teachers, a supporter of transparency, and a supporter of hope by thinking it is okay to give Sokola any possible edge in this election.  I can’t support the triumvirate of Democrat control in Delaware if it means keeping a guy like David Sokola in power.  I will support DSEA and other unions in a lot of areas, but not on David Sokola.  There is no balance in education as long as he retains his Senate seat.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Sokola Ebola Vs. Right To Work: Which Is The Bigger Danger To Education?

  1. Pretty simple. Meredith Chapman is a great human being. David Sokola not so much. Meredith Chapman is for opt out. Dave Sokola not so much. Meredith Chapman is for students. Dave Sokola not so much. Meredith Chapman is for teachers. Dave Sokola not so much.

    There are no guarantees. The democratic legislature could pass a right to work law and democratic John Carney could sign it.. What IS guaranteed is that education prospers under the removal of Dave Sokola. Even if all the scenarios were to hold true, and it is extreme speculation that they could (still waiting on that meteor to hit), Meredith Chapman who supports teachers, can vote no to right to work and it is just the same as if Sokola had been there to do it.. But wait! All our children will have 150% better education in the meantime….

    Hmmm… Decisions, decisions.

    Like

  2. An equivalent would be like voting for the unregistered sex offender Donald Trump, just because he’ll put judges on the Supreme Court who after the nuclear exchange is over, if they survive it, will overturn Roe vrs Wade….

    Like

  3. For those reading this post who do not know me, I want to make sure they are aware that I serve as the Executive Director of DSEA. I rarely, if ever, post on blogs or other social media; however, I feel the need to do so here. While, as President of DSEA, Frederika Jenner is the organization’s named representative on Delawareans First, I serve as her designee. All actions taken by DSEA as part of Delawareans First, were mine, not hers. All comments regarding these actions should be directed at me, not her. Thank you.

    Like

  4. The statement of organization for Delawareans First is available on the Department of Elections website. My vote was based on his position in relation to focus of Delawareans First. To be clear, his opposition to Right to Work legislation.

    Like

  5. There may never be a more definitive piece of evidence than the fact that DSEA completely ignored their members’ wishes, ESPECIALLY the local members in the district who are adamantly opposed to Sokola, and just did what they wanted anyway. The new DSEA motto should be: “Union first, teachers next, students last (if ever).”

    If I’m Meredith Chapman, and I win, I would tell the DSEA to take a hike the first time they knocked on my door in the Senate.

    Like

    1. Wow. What a comment. As someone who sat on the DSEA Interview Committee with both Sokola and Chapman, please know both of them gave DSEA cause for great concern in relation to education issues. BOTH. But then we saw some things in each that members of the committee REALLY liked. I will not get into details of what the committee discussed, but please know our decision to NOT endorse in the race was not taken lightly.

      That being said, I continue to be confused as to how you can’t see we are dealing with two separate issues here. DSEA voted to not endorse based on Sokola’s record on EDUCATION ISSUES. Delawareans First PAC voted to endorse based on Sokola’s record on LABOR ISSUES. Period.

      I’m a person that can deal in nuance and see that while DSEA wasn’t a fan of Sokola on education issues, we absolutely are a fan of him on labor rights issues. And without those labor rights, many of us in DSEA wouldn’t be able to speak as loudly as we do to condemn the policies that Sen. Sokola embraces so passionately. Is this a Catch 22 situation? Perhaps, but I feel completely comfortable in my skin saying that both DSEA’s non-endorsement of Sokola for his education positions and Delawareans First’s endorsement of his labor positions CAN CO-EXIST in this small world.

      I’m sorry you can’t see that.

      Thanks to Jeff for providing his thoughts. I’m in full agreement with him here.

      Like

  6. “our decision to NOT endorse in the race was not taken lightly.”

    Clearly it was. You used teacher contributions to financially back a candidate you didn’t endorse. The issue is that you see teacher dues as yours, and not theirs.

    In fact, the DSEA made the best case EVER for Right To Work with this decision.

    Like

  7. As much as my gut wants to stick it to Sokola over education, I have to agree with Mike Matthews’s reasoning.

    Republican control of the Senate would most likely result in passage of Right To Work For Less. And replacing Sokola with a Republican, however moderate she may or may not be, would put us dangerously close to flipping the Senate. And we cannot count on a wishy-washy Republican-leaning Democrat like John Carney to veto it.

    The single biggest issue affecting Delaware education is poverty. And Right to Work for Less would push poverty in the wrong direction, putting even more stress on families, students, and educators. No thanks.

    Like

  8. In some aspects, I’m glad this conversation came out. While I don’t have a very firm position on Right To Work due to a limited amount of information about it and how it plays out in other states, I can see the pitfalls of it in some areas, especially education. Politics is messy business no matter how many times you slice it. I just wish education didn’t have to be so controversial all the time. The things that really matter should be at the front of the conversation. Sadly, we continue to do the tango…

    Like

  9. Wages fell in New Castle County more than 3% over the last year, and fewer people are employed in manufacturing than at this time last year. Opposing Right to Work in Delaware is about UNION POWER not JOBS or WORKER QUALITY OF LIFE.

    Right To Work benefits workers in many forms, first of all with jobs. Even union membership growth is higher in RTW states. No large manufacturer is ever coming to Delaware without RTW. Volvo wouldn’t even call Markell back because of RTW, and they put a gorgeous, $500 million plant in South Carolina for 2,000 middle class jobs. But hey, we don’t need anything like that here. We’re much better off with huge, vacant manufacturing plants and Sokola’s educational genius.

    http://www.nilrr.org/2016/02/08/right-to-work-advantage-2016-growth-purchasing-power-update/

    Like

    1. There’s nothing sacred about manufacturing jobs. We are nostalgic about manufacturing jobs because we remember them as being good-paying, secure, and with stable schedules. But manufacturing jobs were only good jobs because unions made them that way.

      American doesn’t miss our manufacturing jobs – we miss our unions.

      $15/hr plus a union would turn the jobs we have today back into the good jobs we are nostalgic for, with or without manufacturing.

      Like

  10. “American doesn’t miss our manufacturing jobs – we miss our unions.”

    Actually, South Carolina doesn’t miss manufacturing jobs — because they have them. Tennessee doesn’t miss manufacturing jobs — because they have them. Indiana doesn’t miss manufacturing jobs — because they have them. Delaware misses them — badly. We have an entire generation of workers who are extremely skilled and have a great work ethic — but have no jobs.

    Nobody misses unions. Union membership is declining across the board voluntarily. And a great example of why is the DSEA serving themselves at the expense of their members by taking teacher money and spending it on a non-endorsed candidate like Dave Sokola who has made their lives miserable in the classroom.

    Like

    1. Auto worker wages in Tennessee are below Federal poverty levels and qualify their families for Medicaid, food stamps, and free school lunch.

      Here is what happens to wages under Right to Work for Less:

      Starting Yearly Auto Worker Salary in Tennessee
      $$12,764 – $19,147 [$6.38/hr – $9.57/hr]

      Top Yearly Auto Worker Salary in Tennessee
      $18,235 – $27,352 [$9.11/hr – $13.67/hr]

      from salarygenius.com

      FYI, $15/hour is $30k per year.

      Like

  11. SalaryGenius.com?! That’s your source?!

    “A study of labor costs at automakers with U.S. production plants shows workers at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen plant at the bottom with an average pay and benefits of $38 per hour, according to Reuters.”

    http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/business/aroundregion/story/2015/mar/25/vw-chattanooga-worker-pay-bottom-study-says/295189/

    That’s $38 per hour — actual wages, not a guess from a third-rate jobs website, and that’s THE BOTTOM. I know a lot of auto workers in Delaware that would kill for $38 per hour in compensation.

    You know what the average wage for Delaware auto workers is? $0. And it’ll stay that way until we get RTW.

    Like

    1. The VW number? That’s your source??!

      The VW number of $38/hr is “wages plus benefits” puffed up with benefits and costs most workers never see.

      The salarygenius number, however, is self-reported by actual workers who know exactly how much they make.

      And are you really making the case that Delaware’s path to prosperity is for Delaware workers to underbid Tennessee poverty wages?

      But if you really need more sources, Bloomberg has the scoop:

      Yes, many autoworkers are reasonably well compensated: the average hourly labor cost (pay plus benefits) is $58 at General Motors, $57 at Ford and $48 at Fiat Chrysler, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan. But that’s way down from before the recession and near-demise of GM and Chrysler. It also includes profit-sharing checks that only come in good years. New autoworkers hired by the companies start at a wage of just $15.78 an hour, not much higher than the $15-an-hour national minimum wage recently proposed by Bernie Sanders.

      Workers at nonunion plants owned by manufacturers such as Toyota, Honda and BMW generally make less than those employed by the Detroit Three. So do most American workers. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, average hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers in motor vehicle manufacturing were $27.81 in July, compared with $21.02 for the nonfarm private sector overall. But while private-sector hourly earnings kept rising even through the recession, autoworker earnings are down substantially from a decade ago (and that’s without even figuring in inflation).

      Add in employees of motor vehicle parts manufacturers, and you get a remarkable result. Auto workers no longer make much more than other American workers.

      Like

      1. What I want to know is what Right To Work, if passed in Delaware, would do to education in Delaware and how it would affect kids. Going back and forth about auto workers and Tennessee has validity, but what would this do to the already overcomplicated education system in Delaware?

        Like

        1. It would affect kids because it would limit the rights of their educators to speak up on their behalf publicly because the union would be marginalized and maybe not there to support them.

          If Mike Matthews didn’t have a damn union, Mike Matthews would have been out of a job five or six years ago.

          Like

      2. “The VW number? That’s your source??!”

        Yes. The actual people doing the paying. Your third-rate website relies on unverified self-reporting. If you don’t know the difference, I can’t learn for you.

        “the average hourly labor cost (pay plus benefits) is $58 at General Motors, $57 at Ford and $48 at Fiat Chrysler”

        I rest my case. Find me an out of work Delaware autoworker who wouldn’t take that level of compensation today.

        “Auto workers no longer make much more than other American workers.”

        And auto workers in Delaware make $0.

        And of course their wages are down: automation, productivity increases, outsourcing, general economic trends, all of those play a role.

        “And are you really making the case that Delaware’s path to prosperity is for Delaware workers to underbid Tennessee poverty wages?”

        No. I’m making the case that without RTW, we’ll never build a car again, at any wage. And that case is rock solid. And I LOVE that $38/hr is “poverty wages.” Unbelievable.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s