Another new business item at the NEA Rep. Assembly in D.C. this week would call for NEA to quit the TeachStrong Coalition sponsored by the Center for American Progress. Delaware Governor Markell is one of the biggest advocates for this farce of a coalition and helped to launch the initiative. The Center for American Progress was also the same group that led the “Testing Bill of Rights for Education” which landed with a resounding thud. This led to my creation of the “Parent Bill of Rights for Education” which pretty much led to a two-week banishment on Facebook for myself in April. How dare parents voice their opinion!
The NEA has to realize they are cutting their own throats by aligning with these companies. They need to fight this crap, not join it. To read more on this NBI, please go here. How much do you want to bet the TeachStrong ambassadors were carefully selected by these partnership organizations to further their own agendas, including the ultimate privatization of public schools? Lily Eskelsen-Garcia, you are not leading your membership to glory. You are leading them to the slaughter… will the NEA members wake up and take back any shred of decency before it is gone forever?
A new business item showed up this morning at the National Educators Association’s annual representative assembly, held in Washington D.C. This one is very interesting. It concerns an alleged partnership NEA has with Relay Graduate School of Education. They are both involved in the corporate education reformer led “Teach Strong” initiative. But a partnership bears further investigation. In an article calling out both NEA and the American Federation of Teachers, both NEA leader Lily Eskelsen Garcia and AFT leader Randy Weingarten were raked over the coals for their affiliation with these groups and companies.
This action item calls for an explanation from Eskelsen-Garcia on why she is partnering with an organization that is the anti-thesis of NEA. Programs like Relay and Teach For America diminish the role of teachers in public education and cause a wide-spread path of destruction along the way. Their teachers, no matter what their intentions are, do not receive the same training regular teachers do, and get rammed into a crash-course on teaching. Many of them frequently do not stay in the profession. Some become administrators, leap-frogging past certified teachers, or get jobs with ed reform companies or state DOEs. If NEA is partnering with an organization like Relay, their members definitely need an explanation from Eskelsen-Garcia.
I called her out last year over NEA’s rushed endorsement of the Every Student Succeeds Act. As well, they were a very early endorser for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential candidacy. Even though they are making it an official vote at this rep assembly to endorse her, it is something leadership did almost a year ago already. Right now, Hillary is speaking to the assembled NEA members at their assembly. In a picture taken before she arrived on the stage, teachers are seen waving and clapping as if Hillary is the second coming. Someone made a comment of “Stepford Teachers”… a comment I am inclined to agree with. I am no fan of Hillary, or Trump for that matter. These are dark times…
As the saying goes, while you may want a seat at the table, you also need to recognize when you are on the table. NEA members need to be extra vigilant these days. It’s not just a matter of trust, it is also a matter of survival in an increasingly hostile environment for public school teachers. When dealing with these corporate education reform companies, collaboration is the same thing as alliance. In Delaware, we have this ridiculous thing called “The Delaware Way” where parties comes to the table and compromise. It is ridiculous and absurd and allows very bad entities into things they have no business being in. NEA seems to have taken up this mantra as well. Time to call out the leadership folks!
I didn’t want to put “news” up on the 4th of July, but this one was too important to pass by. The National Education Association (NEA) is having their Annual Representative Assembly in Washington D.C. this week. They just passed an item to launch a digital campaign to advocate for the full funding of IDEA. Since it was reauthorized in 2004, the feds have never given the full amount of funding for special education in America. Here is how it works now: The feds, through IDEA Part B funding, pays about 10-15% of special education costs while states and local districts pay the rest. However, the original intent was for the feds to pay up to 40% of a student’s special education costs.
This glaring omission on the feds part results in states and districts bearing the brunt of the costs. And in a state like Delaware, where there is no Basic Special Education funds from the state for students in Kindergarten to 3rd grade, the local district or charter is forced to pay for 100% of special education services for these students. Despite excellent legislation that would have provided these funds over a period of years for these students, the Delaware General Assembly as a collective body refused to allocate these funds in their most recent budget and the bill didn’t move past being released from the House Appropriations Committee. This should be a no-brainer, but our budget is filled with pork that could have easily been cut to make room for this.
I salute the NEA for their advocacy on this issue. As states struggle with different education funding models, the US DOE needs to step up and do their promised part. But it is up to Congress to allocate these funds. Thank you NEA!
Thank you to Mike Matthews for putting this picture up on Facebook!
The National Education Association is sending emails to all their members tonight for a “last chance” effort to contact the US Senate and to vote yes for the Every Student Succeeds Act. Meanwhile, the always excellent Valerie Strauss with the Washington Post wrote an article today about the unmitigated gall of this bill to compare teacher prep programs to masters degrees!
Yes, NEA wants YOU to support this bill that will slowly drown out members in their organization for more Teach For America, Relay, and whatever new programs come down the pike. And the Feds will make this comparable to a masters degree!
And what are these reduced standardized tests you speak of NEA? Does this bill get rid of the Smarter Balanced Assessment or the PARCC or any of the cheap knock-offs the same companies are having in other states without the “brand” name? Oh yeah, it leaves it up to the states who already have multi-year commitments to these bills. But it looks like teachers won’t be tied to the test as much, so who cares that the same tests are still here. Thanks for your support for parents NEA! Who bought you guys?
The Senate is expected to vote on the reauthorization of the main education law that governs our schools, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) by this Tuesday.
This would mean the end of No Child Left Behind and more opportunity for students to learn. This is in no small part due to the voices over 200,000 NEA members and allies like you.
This is your last chance to weigh in. If passed, the bill will go to the President’s desk to be signed into law.
Will you email your senators now and ask them to get ESEA done?
This new version of the law, the Every Student Succeeds Act or S. 1177, is a big step forward. It will make great strides on what really matters – whether students in all ZIP codes have equitable access to textbooks, AP classes and state of the art equipment.
Ask your senators to support S. 1177 now.
It will also help ensure educators’ voices are part of the decisions and reduce the number of standardized tests and decouple the high stakes attached to them.
In short – this will be a historic moment. Thank you for emailing your senators here and making a phone call at 866-331-7233.
- National Education Association
P.S. You can spread the word by telling friends and colleagues about the vote this week. Share on Facebook, Twitter or by email here.
I wrote a plea to the National Education Association earlier today to wait until they see the final product before urging members to vote yes on the ESEA reauthorization. So can someone please tell me why their President, Lily Eskelen Garcia, is doing the exact opposite? This was sent to all NEA members across the country earlier this week:
An ESEA Update from NEA President Lily Eskelsen Garcia
Admit it, I’ve been telling you since July that we were getting closer to the finish line of ESEA Reauthorization and you have been thinking, “Yeah right!”
Well, as you can read in this statement from the House Education and the Workforce Committee or NEA’s statement, the House-Senate ESEA conference committee has voted to approve the framework agreement for ESEA reauthorization!
What’s next? While we will not see official bill language until November 30th, this framework agreement does seem to address our core goals of closing opportunity gaps, giving students more time to learn and teachers to teach, and includes educators’ voices in the decision making process.
The House is expected to vote as early as December 2nd followed by a Senate vote the week of December 7th. As usual, this is where you come in to continue the incredible work that has moved ESEA Reauthorization this far down the road. Go to GetESEARight.com to send an email, or call 1-866-331-7233 to urge your members of Congress to VOTE YES on the ESEA conference agreement!
I would seriously question the wisdom of your President! This is foolish and hasty at best…
To the members of the National Education Association, the American Federation of Teacher, and the Badass Teachers Association:
I know many of you are torn over the latest edition of the Elementary/Secondary Education Act reauthorization. It looks great on the surface. But embedded within are numerous “easter eggs” designed to steal your jobs right out from under you. It won’t happen tomorrow. It won’t happen a month from now. This is the long con. This bill will eventually replace the jobs you rightfully deserve, and will put data facilitators in your place. Students will be plugged into their personalized learning modules, striving to pass their current unit standardized assessment. K-12 will become a thing of the past. The need for teacher instruction will be gone. I’m going to take a wild guess that most of you don’t see this as a great leap forward in your profession. So I have to ask, why are the leaders of the NEA and AFT urging members to endorse this reauthorization? Why are they considering this the great change that will bring back the respect and standing you have lost over the years? Start at your local level and bring it all the way up the food chain straight to NEA President Lily Eskelen Garcia and AFT President Randi Weingarten. Let your locals know you are not happy with this. The devil is in the details, and while many of you are glad teacher evaluations are being looked at in different lights, do not think for one second that the entire profession of teaching as you know it is not in serious jeopardy. And I would urge Garcia and Weingarten to look out for their members and not play politics with so much at stake. Our children’s teachers deserve better than this bill, and I think you both know this.
To the Badass Teachers: you are all awesome and I love your dedication to education! Don’t change a thing about what you do, but do not endorse this horrible legislation!