Last week, at the Red Clay Board of Education meeting, a huge and heated conversation took place about the lack of diversity at Cab Calloway School of the Arts. It turned into something ugly and what I would not expect from a sitting board member.
Red Clay Board of Education Votes Unanimously For Equity PlanRed Clay Consolidated School District
Last night, the Red Clay Consolidated School District Board of Education voted unanimously for the district to develop an Equity Plan through their long-standing Diversity Committee. The resolution, written by board member Adriana Bohm, would charge the committee to develop the Equity Plan, which will be presented to the board by April of 2018. Many community members came out to give public comment in support of plan.
Where this gets a bit sticky is the two charter schools Red Clay authorizes, Charter School of Wilmington and Delaware Military Academy. As their authorizing agent, Red Clay can conduct their charter renewal process along with formal reviews, modifications, and other such matters. But they cannot dictate district policy to those schools and make them follow it. Both schools have substantially lower populations of racial groups the Diversity Committee would talk about. Failure to address this huge gap between the districts and those charters would ignore the inherent and not-to-be ignored problems of race in the district. Based on enrollment preferences, those schools have the tendency to pick and choose who they want based on “specific interest”.
I definitely think Bohm’s resolution is a good one. Red Clay had mixed results with their Inclusion Plan over the past few years which has prompted significant changes in the way the district handles special education. Based on 2016-2017 data, Red Clay has more minorities than white students, with the largest of those minorities being Hispanic students at around 30%. But what I don’t want to see this committee doing is basing student success on Smarter Balanced Assessment scores. I do not believe these are a valid measurement of student success in any possible way. Many in the African-American community feel these are a valid measurement since they include all students, but when the test is flawed it is not a good measurement.
To read the entire plan, please see below.
Taking A Deep Dive At Newark Charter School & Christina School District: 5 Mile Radius, Greater Newark Area, & District (Including Wilmington)Newark Charter School vs. Christina School District
Ask, and ye shall receive! Whenever I put up an article about Newark Charter School and what I view as their low sub-group population percentages compared to Christina School District, I am asked to do closer comparisons. That is absolutely fair and something I should have done a long time ago. So I plead guilty on that score. But sometimes wanting to know that information to shut me up isn’t always the best idea. Especially when the proof is in the pudding.
The Test Made For White Kids, Not Black KidsAfrican-American Students, Smarter Balanced Assessment
I get it now. A few months ago I was discussing parent opt out with an African-American friend of mine. He explained to me that African-American students don’t do well on standardized tests because they’re written for white kids. I disagreed with him. I couldn’t grasp what was right before my eyes.
The Smarter Balanced Assessment was made for white kids. Civil rights groups, usually backed by the Gates Foundation and other corporate education reformers, claim high-stakes standardized tests are important. They say they need to understand where African-American students rank compared to their peers. This only perpetuates the myth that these tests are necessary. These groups vehemently opposed parents opting out of these tests because they claimed it would only continue pathways to discrimination. Instead, the reality is staring them right in the face. Standardized tests do show achievement gaps. But not because they offer any solutions on how to close those gaps, but because they were written for a specific audience.
These tests fail to understand different minorities or cultures. They were created from a white culture perspective. They ask students to push themselves based on standards that don’t address poverty, low-income, special needs, violent environments, discrimination, segregation, or equity. Even for white students, many who also deal with issues of low-income in our country, don’t perform well on these tests unless they are from more affluent areas.
Charter Schools were supposed to be the savior of education. They were supposed to offer unique new ways of educating students and be models of innovation. Instead, at least in Delaware, they have served as incubators of discrimination, segregation, and racism. We can’t ignore this fact any longer. We have to address this as a state, head-on.
In all likelihood, our charters are merely copying what happens in our regular districts. We see that African-Americans in our traditional school districts do not fare any better on these tests. Charter schools and districts with higher populations of white students do better on standardized tests. This fact hasn’t escaped those who create these tests. They know this. Our politicians and education leaders know this as well. This story isn’t new, nor is it shocking. They have known this ever since standardized tests came about. But we expect African-Americans to perform the same as their white peers. If they don’t, our governments will label and shame the schools and teachers that administer these tests. Why? What is the point?
Education improvement programs make lots of money. If a school isn’t converted into a charter under the accountability schemes brought to you by Education Inc., you better believe some company out there stands to make a tidy profit off “fixing” the “problem”. In Delaware alone, a company called Mass Insight was paid $2.5 million dollars to help out six “priority schools”. All inner-city schools with, you guessed it, very high populations of African-American students.
Delaware Governor Jack Markell said the Smarter Balanced Assessment is the best test Delaware ever made. If that is true, then it shows Delaware to be a very racist state because we allow this to continue. Our Department of Education can throw out statistics and graphs until we are blue in the face, but the true facts are above, and in the article I did on low-income populations and Smarter Balanced proficiency. I have no doubt students will gradually do better on these tests. But not enough to give them the education they deserve. Not enough for African-Americans to catch up to their Caucasian peers. This isn’t defeat. This isn’t accepting a status quo. This is reality. A test solely designed for one pre-dominant culture under the assumption that other sub-groups will catch-up is always destined for eventual failure. Do we call that now? Or do our policy-makers only look at the cost of the test and not the cost to the children of their state?
For parents of African-American students: How many pictures that show the same thing do you need to see? Why are you continuing to let your children take a test that forces them to work harder to live to a different ideal and culture? I’ve seen some of you point out that your children have predominantly white teachers. If our schools and teachers are judged on a test that is written for white kids, and a white teacher is teaching a majority of African-American kids in a classroom, what do you think the results are going to show? This test serves a dual purpose: to keep African-Americans down and to push those unionized white teachers out of public education. If you want more African-American teachers in the future, how will today’s African-American youth even feel inspired to go into education when they are constantly told they are failures based on these tests? These same tests that will eventually break down and morph into end of chapter tests, taken by students multiple times throughout the year. This is not about helping students to become “college and career ready”. It is an elaborate and long-term tracking system. Think about it, and opt out until those in power change these pictures. Look at those in your community who want this. Follow the money. Who are they speaking for? Corporations or children?
Why Should Red Clay Get $6 Million In Funding For Things All Delaware Schools Need & Deserve?Delaware Education, Wilmington Education Improvement Commission
It struck me last night that if the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission’s redistricting plan does pass the State Board of Education, the 148th General Assembly and the Governor that Red Clay will benefit immensely while every other district and charter school in the state will suffer. The plan calls for Red Clay to get all these perks starting out. I’ve heard Tony Allen say the redistricting is the “price for admission” to all the great things WEIC will offer. But why in the world should Delaware taxpayers pay for one district to receive $6 million while the others have to wait? We hear a lot of talk about how Wilmington needs less governance. Allen and Dan Rich talk constantly about how there are 17 governing education bodies in Wilmington between the districts and charters. So going down to 16 is the answer?
I was unable to attend the WEIC meeting last night, but I did communicate with some of the members through Facebook during the meeting. My whole beef with this initiative is the lack of basic special education funding for students in Kindergarten to 3rd grade. For these students, this is their foundation, the building blocks of their future education in Delaware. These students cannot afford to wait through the Response To Intervention process to “determine” if they should get special education services or not. You can’t fix disabilities. While Tony Allen did say he is working on getting this implemented into the state budget, I commented on this Facebook post that it should have ALWAYS been there. The WEIC plan calls for this to start in Red Clay. Sorry Mr. Allen, but what about all the other students with disabilities in the state? Why should all those students be slighted so one district can get millions of dollars for taking $2500 more students, on top of the large increase in regular school funding they will get anyways just by having those 2500 students come into their district?
The biggest disappointment in WEIC for me thus far is their complete and utter failure to look at the elephant in the room: standardized testing. This has done far more damage to Wilmington schools than anything else since The Neighborhood Schools Act. And as we have advocates like Dr. Michael Lomax from the United Negro College Fund playing the civil rights and race cards to make sure Wilmington citizens continue to believe the lies about education in our state through the News Journal, the rest of the state has to wonder how much we can afford to “fix” the problems in education while ignoring the biggest problem of them all. We have a gushing wound here folks, bleeding out faster than we can stop it. Putting a Band-Aid on part of the wound while the rest bleeds out is not going to do anything. Nobody wants to make the head-on charge against Governor Markell. They believe he is infallible. This ignorance is killing us in Delaware. This blind loyalty to a man who continues to lead our children into menial jobs with their Common Core foundation is a disaster in the making. There would be no need for opt-out at all if we can make the changes our state needs in education.
The fact WEIC is even considering making changes to their “final” draft based on the State Board’s cowardly no action is an injustice. The State Board is going way beyond the scope of the legislation surrounding this, and there are a considerable amount of legal questions surrounding their vote of nothingness. Forgive me for saying this, but Dan Rich’s voice in Delaware education for well over fifteen years is enough. What has he done to improve education? Who is he loyal to? University of Delaware or Rodel or WEIC or Tony Allen or Wilmington or Governor Markell or the DOE? See what I’m saying here? So WEIC changes their “final” draft again, do they allow the local school boards a chance to vote on it or do they just say “Here you go State Board, this is what we came up with.” Having one member of the Wilmington school boards on the commission does not give those people the power to speak on the board’s behalf with constantly changing plans. Or maybe this has been the plan all along and we will see the true motivation behind WEIC in these new “final” plans.
If we want to fix Wilmington schools, this is how we do it. About 8% of Delaware’s education funding comes from Federal dollars. But 100% of the current problems are coming from their mandates. Let’s dump the federal funding. Completely. Say bye-bye to it and all the poison and vitriol that comes with it. We are talking about $80 million dollars we just don’t give to our schools. In return, we also say goodbye to state mandated high-stakes assessments. That will save us well over $20 million a year. Since the DOE makes everything about the results of this testing, we would also no longer have a need for all these outside companies coming into Delaware to do their expensive research that tells us nothing new or twists data to make it look like our schools are worse than they already are. This includes many programs through the University of Delaware. This saves us another $30 million or more. The DOE needs some massive trimming. Since there are so many positions there tied to assessments, teacher evaluations, and professional development, we can easily save about $10 million right there alone. Since we don’t have this fed money anymore, we get rid of the labels: priority, focus, focus plan, reward, recognition, etc. All the money that the state ends up paying for that: $2.5 million a year. The next part is a bit trickier and more complicated. We need to recognize which legislators are riding Markell’s gravy train to destroy public education in Delaware. We label them and do everything in our power to make sure they are NOT elected again next November. Many of these legislators allow all the loopholes in the state budget that benefit charter schools and education reform companies. We don’t need Longhurst’s ridiculous SAIL program for our kids after school. We don’t need $11 million going to Delaware STARS for the early childhood education scams. No more charter school transportation slush funds. No more charter school “performance” awards. No more minor capital funding for charter schools. We rewrite the laws and get all this pork out of our state budget. Now we have a surplus from this loss of federal funds. We have more money. This is where we reallocate this money to all our schools. We write our own state standards, as far away from Common Core as we can get, and have true stakeholder input to determine what our children need to know. We find ways to strengthen our teachers by giving them the resources they need: smaller classroom sizes, more support for special education students, and less administrative oversight. We eliminate the biases for charters and get rid of enrollment preferences. We take a strong look at our district formation in Delaware and consolidate many of them. We redraw lines all over the state, not just in Wilmington. We trash the current concept of school choice and disallow students from travelling out of district to go to different schools. We find the flaws in our special education and we plug those holes. We get rid of the cash going to all these administrators whose very jobs were created so students in their districts do better on the state test. Teachers get to actually engage more with their students. Students will care more about their education when true equity is realized. Students who care more will know more and will do better. That is the goal, not forcing them to care.
If companies like Rodel don’t want to play ball with the way things are done, we just don’t listen to them anymore. We bite the bullet and call their bluff and say no to the privatization of our schools. Because that is the end result. All privatization does is give us more charters who perform the same as the deceased traditional school districts, or ones that are essentially free private schools who cherry-pick their way to the top of the school rankings. Kind of like the class system in our country: the lower class, the middle class, and the wealthy class. A lot in the bottom, some in the middle, and very few at the top. This is the end goal with everything going on in education. And as that middle class of education shrinks away, we are left with many at the bottom and a small percentage at the top. This is playing out all over our country, in every single state. The likelihood of your child getting a good education from the way things are now is getting slimmer by the day. It isn’t just African-Americans. It is whites, Hispanics, students with disabilities, low-income/poverty students, all of them.
All of this takes ignoring what those in power are telling us. Those with money and influence. If we want education to survive in Delaware and make it more of an equitable chance for our children, now is the time to institute radical change. Not at the November elections. Not when Jack Markell leaves office in January of 2017. Now. Now is the time. These are my solutions for Delaware schools. Not solutions for Red Clay schools with an expectation that the rest will get those solutions down the road. That is cherry-picking, district style. We are above that as a state. Our children deserve better than that. All students deserve the best education, despite what color or disability or economic background they are from. So let’s stop using the students who are most at risk and start looking at ALL children as unique and finding out what their individual needs are. We can’t lump children into a group and say this is what they need. They are not they. One student. One set of needs. One student at a time.