The United States Department of Education will continue to exert authority in regards to parents opting their child out of state assessments through regulations.
Congressman Jared Polis from Colorado asked Acting Secretary of Education John King, during the “Next Steps for K-12 Education: Upholding the Letter and Intent of the Every Student Succeeds Act” hearing, about opt-out and participation rates.
By stating “we all know states have a historically checkered record of making sure all vulnerable sub-groups are served,” Polis referenced Oklahoma’s State Superintendent as saying “While a state is welcome to pass bad laws as relating to opt-outs, we have Section 4-C-E of ESSA that says states must assess 95% of students. That means all means all.”
Polis quoted US DOE as responding “While it is up to states to determine the consequences of failing to assess students, the Department will provide oversight and enforcement to ensure that states are assessing all students, regardless of what the states laws are and how opt-outs occur.” He then asked John King what steps he plans to take to make sure “all means all” with participation rates.
King responded: “I take that responsibility quite seriously to ensure that all means all. This implementation of the law advances equity in excellence. I think we have an opportunity in the regulations and guidance that we help to provide guardrails that will ensure that states use their new flexibility around accountability and interventions to advance equity. For example, as we begin the negotiated rule-making process around assessments, the kind of questions we’ve been getting have been questions around the participation of students with disabilities, the participation of English learners, the implementation of computer adaptive assessment, in a way that protects equity. And so as we move forward, that negotiated rule-making, a central question will be how do we ensure that regulations we do on assessment protect civil rights of students. And we’ll take a similar approach to the work on the on our negotiated rule-making for supplemented non-supplant and we continue to review, comment, and feedback from stakeholders to define other areas where we need to move forward with regs and guidance.”
Polis went on…. “And while the consequences of meeting the requirements are left up to state law, do you feel that you have sufficient leverage to ensure that those consequences are meaningful and not meaningless?”
King replied: “We do, and I will say it will require vigilance from the part of the Department, especially as states implement their first round of interventions and identify whether or not those interventions are helping to achieve progress, particularly for at-risk sub-groups. We’re gonna have to be vigilant to ensure that states continue to move forward to shift strategy, if a strategy is not working for the highest-need students.”
Define vigilance John King! This violates parental rights at a massive scale. Opt-out is an individual parent choice for their child, not a school’s responsibility to make sure it does or does not happen. It is our right that we choose to exercise. This law gives parents, teachers, and schools absolutely no protection from the iron fist of the federal government. We are back to square one…