The Delaware Department of Education made more changes recently with their leadership. No formal announcement came out for these, but I did some super-sleuthing on their website to figure it out. Continue reading Delaware DOE Makes More Changes In Leadership
And the revolving door keeps swinging. Two longtime Delaware Department of Education mainstays are leaving and one was kind of sort of switched to a new role. Continue reading Breaking News: Major Shake-Up At Delaware DOE
The meeting is about to start. A facilitator introduced himself. Didn’t hear his name. Secretary Godowsky is talking about how the ESSA Adv. Comm. came about (Executive Order #62). Stakeholder input is important. Goal is to submit plan by March, 2017. Thanking everyone for being on the committee. Secretary Godowsky just told the group Delaware schools grew by 1,100 students this year. Appo Super Matt Burrows (the chair) is talking now. Some late members of the committee are forced to sit against the walls cause they don’t have enough chairs to go around the table.
Rollcall: Tony Allen, Atnre Alleyne, Alex Palaono, Matt Burrows, Catherine Hnt, Nancy Labanda, Madeleine Bayard, LaShanda Wooten, Laurissa Schutt, Kim Williams, Nelia Dolan, Stephanie De Witt, David Sokola, Rodman Ward, Eileen DeGregoriis, Wendee Bull, Barbara Rutt, Leolga Wright, Cheryl Carey, Susan Bunting, Deb Stevens, Tammi Croce, Patrick Callahan, Janine Clark, and Genesis Johnson. Other people in attendance are as follows. DOE: Michael Watson, Karen Field-Rogers, Secretary Godowsky, Angeline Rivello, DSEA: Kirsten Dwyer. Caesar Rodney teachers Laurie Howard and Natalie Ganc.
Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams reacted to a statement from the facilitator. She wanted clarification on who is writing the ESSA state plan. The Delaware DOE is. The Adv. Comm. will give recommendations. Tony Allen asked about the due dates for the plan. The facilitator told him there are two due dates, March 31st and July 31st. Delaware chose March 31st because it takes the US DOE 120 days to approve it and they want to get it going by the start of the 2017-2018 school year.
Alex Nook with the Penn Hill Group is giving a presentation on ESSA. He is familiar with federal education law. ESSA gives states more leeway but still has accountability and so forth. Now he is talking about Title I. He asked if anyone in the room doesn’t know what Title I is. No one raised their hand (thank God). States are still required to set long-term goals for academic achievement. Unlike No Child Left Behind, 100% of kids don’t have to be proficient. ESSA gives states flexibility. What kind of accountability system should we have. What works for some schools and what do we need to do for struggling schools. The requirement for turnaround schools but if they want mo money they have to do something for those schools. English Language learners have more focus in ESSA. English proficiency for these students is now a requirement in federal education law. But states determine the timeline for this. Kim Williams asked if this means we won’t fire principals and teachers in turnaround schools. Nook said not federally required. Atnre Alleyne asked what the percentage of Title I funds have to go to struggling schools. Nook said 7%. Alleyne asked how much fed money Delaware is getting. Karen Field-Rogers said she would find out.
Nook said Title II funds are for teachers and professional development. $2 billion nationally, every school district gets a portion of them. Congress felt school leaders weren’t getting enough federal dollars so they allowed states to set aside 3% of funds to ensure leaders get prof. development as well. The rest of the fed money goes to schools and districts for teachers and prof. development.
Another pot of money is Title IV funds. This is a new program. They are consolidating this into a Student Supports and Academic Enrichment Grant. The former funds didn’t work well so this is a larger flexible program. Money is more for what a school district or charter school needs. This is figured out at the local level and not through Congress. Congress hasn’t approved a final amount for this. Obama Administration, Congress, and the Senate are all floating different numbers. There is no existing funding mechanism for this. 21st Century Learning Program will continue. Charter School program will continue: $ for start-ups, help, resources for charters.
Nook is answering questions. DeGregoriis asked for more info on the charter school funding. Alleyne asked about highly qualified teachers and state equity plans. Congress wrote definition, according to Nook, of what a highly qualified teacher was under NCLB. Congress decided that should not be a requirement of the law. Now all teachers must meet state certification plans, so whatever Delaware says, that is it. With the equity plan, a carryover from NCLB, disadvantaged kids can’t be taught by ineffective and inexperienced teachers. That was the plan for why Obama and Congress created the equity plan. These plans weren’t in statute before and the next administration will have more say on what happens with that. Class-size waivers will still be allowed. That can be done through Title II. Kim Williams asked about requirements for a teacher to teach in a classroom. Nook said highly qualified teachers are done but the states handle requirements for this. LaShonda Wooten said highly qualified teachers have to take a test to be highly qualified. So before the feds mandated this, now the states do.
Now Nook is talking about the dreaded R word… regulations. Regulations make sure rules don’t go against the will of Congress for the intent of the law. US DOE put out regulations for accountability and assessments (even though many members of Congress are against John King’s massive overreach on this). These are proposed regulations and the public comment period closed. The accountability regulations had over 21,000 public comments (one was mine, LOL). Regulations say states must have tests available in second most commonly spoken language in the state. Delaware’s plans will hinge on the final form of these regulations so our plans could change. This is one of the reasons why Delaware wants to submit their plans in March. Nook is anticipating the final regulatory package in late November/early December. There will also be an application package put out by US DOE. Deb Stevens asked if the regulations will be ironed out for the states that submit their plans in early March. Nook said it will be very difficult for US DOE to adhere to those due dates if the regulations aren’t set in stone. Nook said he has faith in US Secretary of Education John King to make sure this is done. Stevens asked about giving states more time for the 17-18 school year if things aren’t set in stone. Would Delaware get that flexibility? Nook believes US DOE would be open to that but nothing is written on paper. He understands you don’t want to risk Title I dollars over this kind of stuff.
Nook said the accountability system has to have five different standards, including English Language learner proficiency. The fifth category is picked by the states. Nook said Delaware has an advantage because we already have a multi-level accountability system. Seven states are “competency-based” pilot states. Delaware will have to decide what they want to do (hell to the no on Delaware going competency-based- editor’s note). Nook said the Presidential election will have a huge impact on everything. Whether it is Trump or Clinton there might be change. A new Secretary could change due dates from March to April or change regulatory matters. They may advocate for different funding for programs.
DeGregoriis asked what the benefit is for Delaware submitting their plan early with all these what ifs… Nook said the benefit is being in better shape for budgetary decisions. It sounds like Delaware wants input. Secretary Godowsky said the March due date is a goal. But it could change given all the moving targets. Godowsky said we are making a good effort. Kim Williams asked how we are going to get the new Delaware administration’s input as well. That is her concern with a March due date. She said we could have a new Secretary of Education. Godowsky said they WILL have a new Secretary of Education. He feels if there is a lot of change with the plan, there could be due date changes.
Stevens asked Nook to explain supplement vs. supplant. He defines it as federal dollars are supposed to supplement and not replace systems. Federal dollars need to be on top of a state or local set of resources. There is contention in Congress over this, and a new regulation is out there and public comment is still open until early November. Congress feels Title I should be a more equalized state and local amount of funding. The US DOE is moving forward on the regulations to give districts options on how to even out funding. Stevens explained she understands it could affect local staffing in Title I schools. Tony Allen asked if this is dollar for dollar or equitable funding. Nook said the US DOE is giving districts four options to choose from. (Note to self: look into this one a lot more).
Alleyne asked if this will kick the can down the road more for struggling schools. Nook said Delaware chose to freeze schools for this year that would have gone under the SIG program like previous years. Nook is done. Five minute break.
Break is over. Karen Field-Rogers is talking about what the DOE has done already. She is explaining how they had stakeholder consultation groups they meet with on an already continual basis throughout the year. They have held four community conversations in Dover, Georgetown, Middletown, and Wilmington. There are two discussion groups: School Success and Reporting AND Student and School Supports. They have also had a survey open on their website and they have had over 400 submissions already. The DOE wants a first draft of the plan by the end of this month. They just announced the new Community Conversations. There will be gaps in the first draft. The DOE wants comments. It is not a complete plan at all. They also want to have the first draft so the new Governor-elect will be able to provide input. DOE wants to submit second draft of the plan by the end of the year. Susan Bunting asked if the public will be able to comment online for the drafts. DOE is talking to their lawyers about that. (What? Why?). There were over 100 nominations for the discussion groups. They worked w/organizations like DSEA to pick those members. Only 54 were chosen (27 for each group). Alleyne asked if the representation on the different groups represented the diversity of the state. Field-Rogers believes they have. She said they were very careful about this. She said in Wilmington they partnered with the Christina Cultural Arts Center and there was a block party afterwards. Williams asked what the purpose of the Community Conversations were? Field-Rogers said it is to help guide the DOE with their plan. All the discussion group minutes are on the DOE website (or on Exceptional Delaware- editor’s note). The DOE is in the process of “synthesizing” all the responses to the surveys and will be releasing that information soon.
Facilitator is going over piece of paper handed out to everyone. Asking questions: what is the most important thing that Delaware should accomplish for its schools through its ESSA Plan? What three areas are you most interested in reviewing? The five groups are Supporting Excellent Educations for All Students, Challenging Academic Standards and Assessments, Measures of School Success and Public Reporting, School Support and Improvement, and Supporting All Students. He is giving the group five minutes to fill out the sheet. Then the group will caucus in four to five groups. One person in the group will be a facilitator for each group and will report out to the whole group.
Groups are done meeting. I was chatting with the Laverne and Shirley of Delaware education most of the time. Atnre Alleyne is talking for his group. A big focus of his group was educator equity and accountability. Who is accountable when gaps in the system happen? What happens when people leave the state and more gaps continue? Next group, Laurissa Schutt said their group talked about the timing of the group. As well, they talked about academic supports and how much local discretion there will be. Wendee Bull is talking for the third group: how to still have the rigor we have now, to make sure districts still have accountability to uphold that rigor. The facilitator said ESSA doesn’t totally give up federal oversight of accountability but gives more leeway. It will be determined how much of that flexibility will occur and it will be a balancing act. Patrick Callihan represented the last group. He agreed with Atnre. In order to get there we need a fair and balanced system. Start to change the stigma of how schools are being guided. The feds don’t know a lot about what is going on in Delaware.
I heard this as a rumor a few weeks ago, but the State Board of Education agenda for their meeting on October 20th confirms it. Susan Perry-Manning, the Executive Director of the Office of Early Learning, is resigning from the Delaware Department of Education effective tomorrow, October 7th. She joined the Department in February of 2015, just as the Every Student Succeeds Act and its push for more early childhood education became a very big topic in Delaware and the rest of the country.
Prior to her stint at the Delaware DOE, Perry-Manning was the Executive Director for the North Carolina Early Childhood Foundation. Early childhood education hasn’t been on my radar too much since I began this blog. K-12 education keeps me busy enough! But as I see this corporate push for what many are now calling a “cradle to grave” thing going on, I expect that to change. I’m all for kids learning as soon as they can, but I also worry about what pushing kids at too early of an age, before they are developmentally ready for certain things, will do to future generations of children. I joked once about a fetal Smarter Balanced Assessment. That was years ago. While we haven’t quite reached that point, I am skeptical of more and more corporations getting in on education. I don’t believe in “toddler rigor”. But I do admit I need to understand early childhood education more and see if I can separate the opportunists from those who truly want to help. There is a fine line at times…
Another noteworthy departure is Wayne Hartschuh. He is the Executive Director of the Delaware Center for Educational Technology (DCET). I find that one very interesting because of the personalized learning push in Delaware. He has been with the DOE for over twenty years, so he is definitely a lifer! It looks like the last of the bigger names at the Delaware DOE are leaving before Jack Markell leaves his post as Governor in three months. There is still one more who I wouldn’t shed any tears over if they left. “Elementary, my dear ______” There are a few others who look like they may stick around into the next Governor’s term: Susan Haberstroh, Karen Field-Rogers, David Blowman, and Donna Johnson. Time will tell on them! But the big question is who will be the next Delaware Secretary of Education! Or will Godowsky stick around for a while?
As well, we see the “official” announcement of Denise Stouffer taking over for Jennifer Nagourney, which I wrote about last week. Stouffer has to be having one hell of a week between Prestige Academy turning in their charter at the end of this school year and the bombshell charter school lawsuit against Christina and the Delaware DOE.
How did the Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition get around the Delaware State Education Association?
The Rodel Foundation, Delaware DOE, and the Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition had a meeting coming up on November 20th, 2014. In the meantime, things were heating up with the priority schools, especially a looming showdown between the Christina School District and the Delaware DOE. Many people felt no matter what Christina or Red Clay did, the DOE was going to take the six schools and convert them to charter schools. The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium was getting ready to release the cut scores on the upcoming high-stakes test based on the field tests administered earlier that Spring. The Delaware DOE was starting their town halls for their “school report card”. They had released surveys to the public with ridiculous things like stop lights for grades (this eventually became the Delaware School Success Framework). The IEP Task Force was in full swing and they were actively working on their final draft. Unbeknownst to most, former Rodel employee Matthew Korobkin began his job in the Secretary of Education’s office at the DOE to begin work on the Special Education Strategic Plan. This blogger had started doing some serious digging into Rodel after what I found out at the end of October of 2014. The General Election came and went. Matt Denn won the Delaware Attorney General slot in a landslide. Two new state reps would have a dramatic effect on education in the General Assembly in the next year.
On November 19th, 2014, I released my mammoth Rodel article. Knowing this little group was meeting in back-door meetings would have been good to know when I was writing that article. It would have filled in some holes. From what I heard from a few people, this article really rattled Rodel CEO Paul Herdman. I know he was upset with me for daring to allege that Rodel would ever make money from hedge funds and somehow profit off Delaware education. But in any event, the CBL Guiding Coalition was about to meet…
I tried the link referenced in the email to an Ed Week article, but the link no longer exists. I have no doubt it reference some personalized learning school and how great it was. When you look at the above email, note the word barriers. If competency-based learning is supposed to be so great, why would there be any barriers? At this point, it is probably a good idea to let folks know who was on both the Core and Advisory groups for this.
In terms of involvement, I don’t know if every single person participated in this CBL Guiding Coalition that was now divided into two groups. I do know, for example, that Yvonne Johnson with the Delaware PTA did not go to any meetings of this group whatsoever. There were six district Superintendents and one charter Head of School on the coalition. Quite a few of the teachers were also on the Rodel Teacher Council. Note the presence of university and college members. There was a specific reason for that which will come in later parts. Now, on most education committees and task forces, or any type of education group, there is always representation from the Delaware State Education Association. But not on this coalition! To me, the key figures in this group were Michael Watson, Susan Haberstroh, Wayne Hartschuh and Donna Johnson. They were (and still are) important people at the DOE who were in a position to let the ideas of this group come into being.
In terms of the barriers, the coalition was very visible with what the policy and system barriers could be:
In answer to why DSEA wasn’t represented on this committee, I think the words “collective barg”, which would be “collective bargaining” gives a clear answer to that question. Unless this is all about some secret archaeology plan, I can only assume “dig learning” is “digital learning”.
Policies on seat time? What does that mean? In a competency-based world, a student doesn’t move on until they master the assignment or concept. They must be proficient. So what measures that proficiency? The teacher? Or a stealth assessment embedded into the ed tech the student is working on? I love how the DOE and ed reformers turn simple words like “jigsaw” into something else. I know what they mean, but why do they do that?
By the time their January 2015 meeting came around, the holidays came and went. All eyes were on the Christina School District as they valiantly fought the DOE on the three priority schools in their district. Red Clay signed their Memorandum of Understanding with the DOE. A financial crisis occurred during Family Foundation’s charter renewal. The community rallied for Gateway Lab School. Parents were talking more and more about opt out. And the General Assembly was back in session…
To Be Continued in Part 4: Playing with regulations, priorities change, and the DOE and the Governor freak out…
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. -Albert Einstein
If you go to a charter school in Delaware without a lot of low-income and poverty, the chances are pretty good you will do better on the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Pictures don’t lie. Yes, there are some exceptions, but for the most part, the odds speak for themselves. Even the former “heroes” of Delaware like EastSide Charter School are not immune to the wrath of the Smarter Balanced Assessment.
Now you might be thinking, “you didn’t put in all the charters”. I didn’t put in Gateway Lab School and Positive Outcomes. Their populations are mainly special education and they did not do well on this test at all. Freire and Great Oaks don’t have their low-income data on the DOE website. Academia Alonso only goes up to 2nd grade so far. Charter School of Wilmington, Delaware Academy of Public Safety & Security, Delaware Design-Lab, Delaware Military Academy, and Early College High School are all high schools, so now Smarter Balanced for them! And who knows where Delaware College Prep is. I’m assuming their scores will be included with Red Clay’s when those come out, but they’re closing anyways.
The traditional school districts didn’t have as drastic of a low-income impact on Smarter Balanced proficiency, but the data for each school in the districts won’t be out until next month. That will give us a much better idea of how low-income status affects different schools.
It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them. -William Vaughn
To see how all the kids did in the state, take a look at the below fluff piece that was presented to the Delaware State Board of Education by the DOE’s Instructional and Accountability guru, Michael Watson. While the participation rates may have gone up in a lot of schools, more parents were opting their kids out than last year. And I believe that trend will continue when a lot of parents see their child still isn’t proficient on this test. There has to come a point in time when parents start thinking this test really is bad and if I want my child to get a good education, it can’t be based on this test.
At this point, you have to ask yourself, if standardized tests are bad for teachers, and they’re bad for kids, who exactly are they good for? -John Oliver
As Delaware teacher Mike Matthews brilliantly pointed out to Governor Markell (see the article before this one), poverty has a huge effect on educational outcomes. We can pretend it doesn’t, but until we somehow find a way to eliminate that, we will see the same results every standardized test tells us. They are socio-economic indicators. That’s it. I’m sure the Delaware DOE and State Board of Education will start flinging mud at a ton of schools, and we will fight them. You can’t ignore these graphs, especially the charter schools. They are more extreme because of enrollment practices. We all know it. Let’s stop pretending certain ones are great success stories.
My innovative education program will improve school accountability, fix our flawed state testing system and ensure school funds directly benefit Delaware’s children—and are not wasted on bureaucratic overhead costs. By attracting and retaining the best teachers through competitive salaries and benefits, we will improve classroom learning and reduce drop-out rates. We must expand early education programs and link preschools with local school districts to create a unified learning environment. -Jack Markell from his Blueprint For Delaware, 2008
You know, it’s amazing. I’ve not yet met a single parent or teacher who tells me that their hopes and their aspirations for children are wrapped up in scores on high-stakes tests. We have designed an education system that profits test-makers. Now we need an accountability system that benefits the test-takers. And as Governor, I will scrap the Delaware Student Testing Program and I will replace it with an assessment tool that helps teachers improve student learning. -Jack Markell at DSEA Primary Debate against John Carney and Mike Protack, 2008
Alright, I admit it. Asking Delaware teachers if they would consider taking a cut in their benefits and pensions probably wasn’t the smartest move in the book, but many of you came out in droves to respond. Granted, no administrators, principals, or superintendents replied. The article went over like a resounding thud. But I challenge every single teacher in the state: if not benefits or pension, what do you view as wasted money in our schools? And please don’t say “nothing”. We spend a billion dollars on education in Delaware and that’s just from the state. We also get federal money and local funds from school taxes. While other states may laugh and say “that’s it?”, we are a small state with less than a million people and about 133,000 kids in public education. Since this could be a hot topic with certain folks, feel free to post anonymously on this!
Since I just got home from work and grocery shopping and I’m dead to the world now, just a few updates on recent stuff. They must have a huge cricket crisis going on in the Appoquinimink School District, because that’s all I’ve heard from them since I dropped the special education funding bomb on them last week. I did have an interesting comment on the “Unsustainable” article that had me wracking my brain all day. Delaware school districts and charters might be thinking I’ve slowed down on them and my target of the month is Appo. Wrong! I have a ton of articles that will be coming out in the next couple of weeks. One is about an interesting superintendent situation going on in one of our school districts. That one led to a VERY interesting board meeting last month. Dr. Mark Holodick is winning the “who will be the next Secretary of Education in Delaware poll”, followed by Susan Bunting. Every one seems to be playing pin the tail on the auditor in the past week and everyone wants to know when Tom Wagner is actually going to, you know, do some audits. Kenny Rivera is now the Vice-President of the Red Clay Board of Education and Michael Piccio was voted in as the President. The State Board is having their monthly snooze fest on Thursday. Expect to hear some type of hip-hop hooray about the latest Smarter Balanced Assessment results but not the actual final scores cause they aren’t done yet. Both the Christina and Red Clay Boards of Education passed resolutions to suspend the WEIC timeline which will be echoed by WEIC at a meeting on July 26th. On Wednesday, WEIC will be honored by the Progressive Democrats of Delaware as their Education Heroes of the Year. So Elizabeth Lockman gets a two-peat! Jack Markell hasn’t signed the teacher evaluation bill yet, House Bill 399. I guess he was too busy not filing to run for Congress (okay, I never said I bat home runs every time)! Delaware Military Academy wants to build a sports dome, but not with any funding from the state. They said it will all be from private donations. Apparently Chief of Instruction Michael Watson at the Delaware DOE has been “chosen” to be on John Carney’s “transition team”. How very presumptuous of you Mr. Carney. Today is State Rep. Trey Paradee’s birthday so wish him a Happy Birthday on Facebook. I did hear back from EFIC about their epic fail, which is the Education Funding Improvement Committee’s final report. Apparently “their work isn’t done yet” after having a due date of March 31st which was extended until June 30th. Publius disappeared from Kilroy’s Delaware about a month ago and hasn’t been seen since. He said something about the sign is in the yard. It makes me very curious why he would feel he shouldn’t comment “anonymously” on a blog anymore. Especially in light of a recent vacancy in Dover (totally speculating on this one folks). Unless…
Establish a “critical mass” of support for CBL in DE and leverage supportive voices to raise awareness about CBL
A group of Delaware teachers, in conjunction with a few Superintendents, principals, a high-ranking member of the Delaware PTA, the executive director of the State Board of Education and members of the Delaware Department of Education found a way to sneak in a future-changing regulation eight months ago with a group no one knew about and never had any notices of public meetings. But all is not as it appears. In doing so, they opened the gates to one of the most dangerous corporate education reformers out there.
Have you ever heard of the Delaware Department of Education Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition? Me neither. Until last night. In doing a massive amount of research on the Leader In Me program in many of our Delaware schools (and there will be MUCH more on that coming), I found a very odd write-up on the Rodel Foundation of Delaware website.
In investigating a school in the Capital School District that is heavily promoting the snake-oil Leader In Me program, I came across the Rodel Teacher Council section of their website on a Google search. And there it was, under Michele Johnson of Towne Point Elementary School in Capital School District. I knew she was involved in the Leader In Me program, but what I didn’t know and had never heard of was the Delaware Department of Education’s Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition. I’ve looked at every single section of the DOE website and never found anything about it. So I went back to Google. I found a link to a pdf from a State Board of Education work session on July 16th, 2015.
To give some more background, this was an important day in Delaware education. It was the same day Delaware Governor Jack Markell vetoed House Bill 50. The State Board holds their work sessions during the morning before their board meetings. The State Board did have it on their agenda for this work session but try looking for anything else on this group and you will be hopelessly lost. With most groups at the Delaware DOE, there is something listed somewhere. But not with this one. There was no notice of public meetings and no transparency whatsoever. Why would there be? This was a Rodel group from their hand-picked teacher council. If you never believed Rodel was running education in Delaware, you will after reading the below document. Every single thing I’ve been writing about on this blog for the past nine months: about competency-based education, personalized learning, pathways to prosperity, the “Dear Hillary” letter, it is all in this 10 page pdf in some form.
So this group recommended finding a way past these barriers to competency-based education in Delaware. The pictures of the post-it notes show words like “urgency” and “barriers”. They mention collective bargaining as a “system barrier”. This Rodel Teacher Council sold their souls to Rodel when they joined this cabal. In the above document there is an entity called Reinventing Schools. I’ve heard of this company but this is the first time I ever saw them mentioned in Delaware. But obviously Rodel has been working with them behind the scenes for many years. To find out why, I highly suggest reading this article on the funded by the Gates Foundation organization led by Dr. Marzano.
I put a picture at the beginning of this article with the members of this Rodel created group. While I’m not surprised by most of the names, one of them stood out: Yvonne Johnson. As the face behind the Delaware PTA for many years, Johnson has been involved in many groups in one form or another. I originally wrote, and have now changed in this article, is how Johnson was involved with this group. I just spoke to Yvonne Johnson who was very upset about her supposed involvement with the Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition. As Johnson told me, she was invited to a webinar on this and there was a meeting at Howard High School of Technology about it. She said she does not support competency-based education and the other Delaware PTA member, Ashley Gray, told this group this was not for the Delaware PTA. Obviously the Rodel machine presented this information to the State Board of Education, close to a year later, suggesting the full involvement of Delaware PTA. But that is not the case. It is just another example of our State Board of Education being duped by Rodel into passing regulations they really don’t have a clue about.
The biggest barrier to implementing competency-based education in Delaware was the graduation requirements. They had to change existing state code to do that. Lo and behold, they did exactly that. But not without some old fashioned trickery. At the August 20th State Board meeting, Regulation 505 was put up for discussion by the State Board.
In listening to the State Board audio recording for this meeting, notice how it is introduced as having nothing to do with competency-based education. For a long time, they talk around it. It isn’t until the President of the State Board, Dr. Teri Quinn Gray, seeks clarification on this regulation that anyone in that room would know what they were talking about. As well, Tina Shockley with the DOE sped through describing the regulation very fast. But when the conversation gets going, Michael Watson from the DOE responds to a question from Gray about struggling students. He responds by saying some students can reach mastery in 180 days but for other students it may take longer and that’s okay. So is he suggesting some students will have to go to school longer?
At the September State Board meeting, when everyone was going nuts about opt out penalties in the Delaware School Success Framework/Regulation 103 fiasco, the State Board passed this regulation. But I find it hysterical how all the language surrounding the DSCFY wasn’t even needed to begin with which I’m sure the DOE was well aware of. In my opinion, they put it in the regulation to put the focus around that knowing it would be removed to get what they want.
So what does all this mean?
Here is the easiest way to break it down. This isn’t a Delaware thing. It is happening all over the country. To put it in a nutshell, corporations took over public education. This is a plan that has been in place for decades. First they had to make it look like public schools were failing students. This began in 1983 when the report called A Nation At Risk was released by the federal government. This damning report on public education changed the perception of schools in America. It also began the thirty-three year coordinated attack against teacher unions. Ten years later, the country’s first charter schools came into being. At the same time, Bill Clinton became the U.S. President. His wife Hillary received a letter from Marc Tucker, who went on to be one of the chief architects of Achieve Inc. and the Common Core.
By the late 1990s, standardized testing with high-stakes was the law of the land in Delaware. When Delaware launched the DSTP test, students did horrible on it. Many students dropped out of school as testing mania took over the state. Graduation rates dropped due to the requirement of proficiency on the horrible test. In 2002, No Child Left Behind demanded all students in America become proficient on these high-stakes tests by 2014. It was completely absurd and everyone knew it, but it was a stall tactic. As Common Core came out in President Obama’s second year, Delaware switched to another test called DCAS. While not as bad as DSTP, it was offered two to three times a year. Race To The Top was in full swing along with all the ESEA Flexibility Waivers. Charter schools were rising in popularity for the past decade and the teacher unions were under attack. To get all of this going, the teacher unions had to be destroyed. But they couldn’t bust the unions, just give them a slow and painful death.
Many teacher unions across the country caved in to the new corporate education reform suggestions. They could have fought it, but it would have given an already rising bad perception of them an even worse one. So with the help of school boards, the unions signed on to Race To The Top. Even the state PTAs got sucked into the Common Core/Race To The Top vortex. Common Core was the boss, teachers were the servants, and students were the true victims. Then came the even newer high-stakes assessments tied to the Common Core. Meanwhile, new education think tanks and non-profits emerged from nowhere to give more and more bad news about education and how to fix it. In Delaware, we call them the Rodel Foundation and the Vision Coalition. They have been around for a long time, but they are one and the same and they are as venomous to public education as any of these other education fixit organizations.
So here we are now, in 2016. Governor Markell finishes up next January and in comes John Carney. Like the rushed implementation of Common Core, in the next few years we will see the “urgency” to incorporate full-time competency-based learning in our schools. Our students will be on the computer all the time in this era of “personalized learning” while our teachers become glorified guides and facilitators. As veteran teachers leave the profession in droves, we will see more duds like Teach For America and Relay Graduate School coming into our schools. They won’t be union, and they will take over. With their corporate driven brainwashing, we will see more “teacher-leaders” come into play via programs like “Leader In Me”. But education is, and always has been, about the students. What happens to them? This is the kicker.
All of this, everything since the day A Nation At Risk was introduced 33 years ago, has been with this plan in mind. It is all an elaborate tracking measure meant to keep down minority students, students with disabilities, and low-income students. They will not do well in this. We see this with the Smarter Balanced Assessment and the PARCC tests. The resources and funding are there. They have always been there. But our states and government didn’t want to fix education. They had to tear it down first and build it up again to one of their own design. They don’t want anyone questioning their authority. They want their worker bees to fall in line with their career pathways and shut up. They had to beat down the teachers and numb the minds of children. They do not care and have no remorse if anyone gets in their way. Even the charter schools they so methodically built up were fodder for sacrifice if need be. We saw this in Delaware as many charters closed and more sprung from the ashes.
What the corporate education reformers do is use the art of distraction to an astonishing degree. They know those who oppose them can’t fight everything all at once so they get us to focus on certain things. Take opt out for example. While they know opt out kills everything they are planning, they also know it is the key to their future. The once a year test will go away. It will be broken down into little tiny chunks, embedded into the end-of-unit personalized learning chapter. But a student must score proficient to be able to move on. They must “master” the material. But who writes the material? Who grades the mini-assessments? How long will a student be “held back” until they get it? What happens when a student just gives up because they are so mentally frustrated? How does IDEA and existing law fit in with any of this? Does anyone care about these kind of things anymore?
Governor Markell and Dr. Paul Herdman, along with their key player at the Townsend Building in Dover, Donna Johnson, have been the masterminds behind all of this in Delaware. Does anyone think it is a coincidence there have been very few task forces, working groups and committees with an actual State Board of Education member on it? It is always Executive Director Donna Johnson. Calling the shots. Bossing people around as if she is the ultimate authority in education. Manipulating the playing field to the agendas she controls. She did it with WEIC, the priority schools, the Delaware School Success Framework, Common Core, opt out, and all the other destructive policies and regulations under her control. We don’t have a State Board of Education. We have Jack and Donna’s puppets. Behind them is the face of Rodel: Dr. Paul Herdman. The single-most, number one with a bullet, vessel of discrimination and evil I have ever met in my life. The man behind the Delaware curtain. The man who helped Jack into the Governor role. The man who took over the Delaware Department of Education. The man who directs it all in Delaware. Who answers to his masters in bigger organizations like the Aspen Institute, Achieve Inc., the Lumina Foundation, and Reinventing Schools. Behind them are the true power players in the guise of the US Department of Education, the US Department of Labor, Mark Zuckerberg, and the Gates Foundation. And then there are the investors and hedge fund managers and corporations making billions of dollars off all of this. For those living in other states who may not be familiar with many of these names, I’m sure if you look hard enough, you have your own puppet masters pulling the strings.
At this point, I don’t know if those who oppose this could stop any of this. It is so embedded into policy and law. All the states were required to have some type of career workforce plan based on the below federal document. The future is now. It is here. This Leader In Me garbage that is sweeping our schools is the biggest example of this. It goes beyond the classroom and invades the home. It has children making the parents compliant to this nonsense. Their “data walls” are one of the most disgusting and abhorrent acts of labeling, shaming, and discrimination I have ever seen in my life. But far too many of our Delaware teachers think it is okay. This is what happens when you are brainwashed to points beyond common sense. When you are fed the same false garbage time and time again. You begin to believe it. You become the enemy before you even realize it. When you once questioned all of this and you become a slave to the compliance machine. I am not saying these teachers are bad or even evil. They are misguided. They have been fooled and once the Rodelian mindset becomes a part of your thinking, they have their hooks in you. They mold and shape you into another one of their puppets or put your name out there to make it look like they have diverse “stakeholder input”. It seems like people with the last name of Johnson are their favorites. Charter schools, by their very nature, are ripe for takeover or creation by the Rodelian puppet masters. And don’t think it ends with Jack Markell.
But too many of us were blinded by opt out, teacher evaluations, and charter schools to even notice. All we hear about anymore on social media is Trump and Hillary. It doesn’t matter who wins because all the pieces were put into play years ago. They snuck it all in when those who should have seen it were distracted. As our pre-schools and schools become community centers and human teaching becomes a thing of the past, what happens to the children of tomorrow? Will we even need the school building in the future? What happens when they become indoctrinated into the cults of compliance? When they lose their spark? As the more affluent families stay in power while the vast majority of the population perform all the low-paying jobs? Who will rise from the ashes like a phoenix to turn it all around again twenty years from now? Or fifty? Many have predicted the machines would take over. But what they failed to realize was the machines were children. I saw this coming. I knew it. But I was looking in the wrong place. And for that I apologize. At some point, like everything in history, there will be a revolution. Only we can decide when that is.
The Delaware Assessment Inventory Committee met in February, and the meeting was very controversial! It is interesting how the Delaware Dept. of Education spun what happened in their meeting notes. The minutes, written by Susan Haberstroh with the DOE, do show a lot of discussion around the Smarter Balanced Assessment and its effectiveness. In the above link with my perception of the meeting, I have, verbatim, what I said in my public comment. Never once was the word “weasel” used!
The next meeting of the Assessment Inventory Committee is on the Delaware Public Meeting Calendar for May 2nd at 4:30pm at the Townsend Building in Dover.
I just saw a tweet from EdWeek about three states participating in a web-based seminar on competency-based education. This webinar will include Michael Watson, the Chief Academic Officer and Assistant Secretary for the Delaware Department of Education. Also participating are representatives from the Florida and Tennessee Departments of Education.
There is no stopping the destructive train barreling into the destruction of public education teaching. It is so embedded into our state and federal governments with vast amounts of money and lobbying twisting the tale so Wall Street investors and hedge fund managers can make tons of money. I’ve been warning everyone about this for almost two years now, with each new initiative becoming more insidious than the next. But far too many people either just don’t care or think all of this is really great for students, teachers, and schools.
The Seminar will be led by Karen Cator with Digital Promise. While putting this under the guise of professional development for teachers, it is becoming more than obvious this is the future of education. Or at least what the corporate education reformers want it to be. Parents need to wake up fast because their children’s personal data is going out like the Hoover Dam just burst wide open. There is nothing holding it in check anymore. This is the future with hints thrown all over the place:
- The Data Consortium
- The Tentacles Of Corporate Education Reform
- The Marc Tucker Letter To Hillary Clinton
- Assessment Inventories And Data Bills
- Social Impact Bonds
- Delaware State Rep. Earl Jaques, Governor Markell, & John King
The future is here. Opt out is the only way to stop the whole reform movement designed to put children in the same box and carve out their future career paths. Opt out is the best recourse. It prevents the massive amount of data about your child from falling into the greedy little hands of Education Inc. Only parents can stop this train. We can’t rely on anyone but ourselves. The “stakeholders” who are supposed to serve as the guardians of the gate are hand-picked by those with the power. It is all a lie. Our legislators who truly care are outnumbered. Our state Departments of Education are stacked with ed reformer employees. Most of our Governors are all in on these “career pathways”. The national PTAs, teacher unions, and civil rights groups are all in bed with the Every Student Succeeds Act knowing full well the dangers that lurk within. Our school boards are infiltrated by those who wish to continue the corporate education reform movement. Teachers, for the most part, are powerless for fear of retribution or getting fired. No child in public education is safe anymore unless parents rally and take back the conversation. We need to do this as a unified front. We need to do this en masse. We need to do it now. We need to be the heroes and be a warrior for education. We need to cut them off at the knees and the most powerful way to do that is with opt out.
The Office of Accountability and Assessment is gone. Previously led by Penny Schwinn, who departed the DOE earlier this month, it is now part of the Teaching & Learning Branch but only as the Office of Assessment. Dr. Carolyn Lazar is still listed as the Interim Director of The Office of Assessment, in the sub-section of the Teaching & Learning Branch which is still led by Michael Watson. There is a sub-section under the new Deputy Secretary, Karen-Field Rogers, called Performance Management, but that is showing as vacant. This is echoed with the Data Management office. Former Deputy Secretary David Blowman has taken over Field-Rogers slot as Associate Secretary Financial Management & Operations. It looks like he still oversees the Charter School Office. Chris Ruszkowski is still running the show in the Teacher/Leader Effectiveness Unit.
It appears the DOE is in the process of updating their website, because if you look under their “leadership” tab, it still shows Penny Schwinn there, and Blowman as the Deputy Secretary. There are many such errors on their website. If you look under the Exceptional Children Resources group, it still shows Sarah Celestin listed even though she left the DOE last summer to become the Special Education Director at Red Clay Consolidated School District.
The DOE has seen some key departures and changes in the past few months since the new Secretary of Education, Dr. Steven Godowsky, took the helm. With the amount of work the DOE receives based on the never-ending barrage of changes implemented by the State Board of Education and the feds, with more coming every day, on top of compliance issues, implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act, charter school issues always going on, priority schools, assessment changes, state budgets and everything else is the DOE staff reaching a point where they are actually understaffed? Do they have too much on their plate? In some areas I would say so, but in others there is a lot of wasted money and resources going out. Like the TLEU. Every time I look, they are paying someone to come up with the latest report on Educator Effectiveness. Or the Office of Assessment, constantly regurgitating report after report about Smarter Balanced and everything that goes with it. Figuring out the Rubiks Cube that is the Delaware DOE is always a challenge…
I write about these people all the time, and I take for granted that most of you have no clue who some of the Secretary of Education’s underlings are! So here is an organizational chart, taken from the DOE website, from August 2015. Don’t be alarmed about the name at the top! Mark Murphy’s last day is September 30th, 2015.
The hardest part about writing this article was coming up with the title. There were so many things I could have named it. Such as “It could have been worse, it could have been rocket ships.” Or “Vermont and Connecticut are really going to hate Delaware soon.” Or “We gotta grow them.” Or “Is it still an embargo if they reveal it at a public meeting?” In any event, I attended part of the State Board of Education retreat today. I arrived at 1:30pm, and I was the ONLY member of the public there. I received some stares. All but two members of the State Board of Education were present. Those that were there were President Dr. Teri Quinn Gray, Vice-President Jorge Melendez, Gregory Coverdale, Pat Heffernan, and Nina Bunting.
When I got there, head of the Teacher/Leader Effectiveness Unit Christopher Ruszkowski was giving a presentation on, what else, teacher effectiveness. There was a slide up which said TEF- 5 charters, TEF- 6 charters, Freire, Colonial, Aspira. If I had to guess, these are schools or “collaboratives” that have or will have their own teacher evaluation system. The Rus Man (sorry, spelling his last name is a huge pain!) said Lake Forest School District believes DPAS-II is more equitable. Rus said “Districts not using the new evaluation methods are not as successful.” He explained how some districts get “caught up in the structure” and “the rules”. He said principals want more high-quality data, and they are having better conversations about Measure B in the DPAS-II system.
This was followed with a presentation by Dr. Shana Ricketts. She explained how that state trained 125 principals over the summer, and there will be training sessions over the next two weeks, and DSEA will be holding workshops over the changes in the DPAS-II. The Rus Man explained how Delaware has the “most decentralized system in the country for teacher evaluations and goals are different across the board.” A question came up about assessments. Discussion was had about reducing assessments even more. “If we standardize chemistry exams why have teacher ones as well,” Rus Man asked. “But some are teacher-created, which is good cause it shows growth.” Dr. Gray responded with “Gotta grow them!” Rus man explained how “teachers need to be empowered”, “our obligation to be world-class is students have to be proficient when they graduate”, and “We are trying to ask the right questions.” Rus man also said “There is not enough rigor.”
At this point, Dr. Penny Schwinn came in, followed shortly by Ryan Reyna, who works under Schwinn. Actually, I should say next to her as they are both easily the two tallest employees at the DOE. While I was distracted, Rus Man said something about “Commitment to proficiency…mindblocks….set the target, work my way back” followed by something about the “culture of the building”. To which board member Pat Heffernan responded with “We can’t put blinders on and have no idea.” Gray responded with “We want growth AND proficiency!” followed by “We don’t set the goal based on average, we set it on growth.” Rus Man responded by saying “We are to be compared to everyone. Not Delaware, not other states, but everyone in the world.” He stated our principals are aware of this. Someone asked if our principals understand this. He explained how the alternative is the “same way we’ve done for 100 years, mastery of standards to grade book…” Gray burst out that “It should be proficiency based!” Board member Nina Bunting thanked Rus Man for the presentation and said “It was very informative.” Heffernan said we need to “encourage principals to encourage good data entry.”
The State Board took about a ten minute break at this point. Dr. Gray asked how I was doing, and I proceeded to tell her all about my hernia and my operation. She explained how her brother had that done. I asked if it was stomach or groin. She said stomach. I told her mine was groin. She just kind of stared at me for a few seconds, unsure of what to say.
At this point the accountability trio of Dr. Penny Schwinn, Ryan Reyna, and Dr. Carolyn Lazar began to give a presentation on Smarter Balanced. I actually asked if this meeting had any embargoed information I shouldn’t know about. Donna Johnson, Executive Director of the State Board of Education, explained this is a public meeting. Most of the information was already on the state DOE website. Lazar explained how 21 states took the field test, and 17 Delaware districts participated. All told, 4 million students took the field test in the USA. Schwinn explained how elementary schools outperformed middle schools and high schools in both math and ELA. Heffernan asked if this included charters on the data they were seeing, but Schwinn explained the charters were on a separate slide. Lazar said there was a 15 point gap between Math and ELA, but the “claim area” was only 10 points. At this point, Dr. Gray asked what the proficiency level was. For the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Lazar explained it is the students who score proficient or above. That is good to know! Next they went over slides showing how close or how far districts were between Math and ELA scores. Donna Johnson commented how Capital School District’s proficiency lines attached which is very unique. Schwinn responded that this “speaks to the rigor of assessment.” Schwinn brought up the student survey and said that 7,000 students self-selected to perform the survey at the end of the test. Dr. Gray said that isn’t statistically normed. Schwinn explained it was not, but the survey will become automatic next year, like how it was on DCAS.
Michael Watson, the teacher and learning chief at the DOE, presented next on Smarter Balanced in relation to teaching and instruction. He explained how we need international assessments so we can compare against India and China. He explained how Delaware had “strong positive indicators with National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) trends.” Watson proceeded to show the board a chart showing how Delaware compared to nine other Smarter Balanced Assessment states that released their data. Delaware came ahead for literacy in third to fifth grade, but much lower in ELA for 8th grade. Next, Watson gave a long talk about comparing Delaware to Connecticut with Smarter Balanced results and the two states NAEP results. He found that Delaware trailed behind Connecticut in NAEP, but we were closer to their scores with Smarter Balanced. I wanted to burst out “That’s cause SBAC sucks so I would expect most states to suck equally on it”, but I bit my tongue. But as I thought about it, comparing two different states NAEP scores to SBAC is like comparing a clothing store to Chuck-E-Cheese. There really isn’t a comparison as they are two different entities. In talking about the states Delaware scored near the same as on SBAC, Watson actually said “Either Connecticut and Vermont didn’t take SBAC seriously or we are working harder.” Bunting explained how in Indian River, “when state says jump we say how high!”
**At this point, Watson looked over at me and said the next slide is embargoed information but he presented it anyways. So I can’t write about the embargoed information presented to me at a public meeting about a survey done showing that in Delaware, 88% of Superintendents feel we have implemented Common Core, followed by 87% of principals and 67% of teachers. For some reason, this is top-secret embargoed information that won’t be released until next month or something like that. (**SEE UPDATE ON BOTTOM)
I had to leave to pick up my son from school. I brought him home and checked my email real quick. I did get an email from Yvette Smallwood who works for the state on the Delaware Register of Regulations. She informed me, in response to my request they remove Regulation 103 from their September publication due to issues of non-transparency surrounding it, that they couldn’t remove it but the DOE did agree to extend the public comment period until October 8th, which would be 30 days after Regulation 103 was put on this blog! I drove back to the State Board retreat and as I walked in I heard Dr. Gray talking loudly about parents needing to understand. At which point Reyna pointed to a chair for me to sit in and Dr. Gray stopped talking about whatever parent thing she was talking about.
The infamous “toolkit” has been fully released on the Smarter Balanced website. It includes a link to the DelExcels website, some other “very informative” websites called Great Kids and Be A Learning Hero. The DOE is working with DSEA to get information out for parents to understand the Smarter Balanced results. According to Donna Johnson, many districts are excited to get the information to parents, and are aligning curriculum and professional development in an effort to gain more awareness. The DOE is working with superintendents, principals, social media, and their partners (Rodel). The test results won’t be mailed out from the DOE until Friday, September 18th and Monday, September 21st. Which is probably their way of screwing up my well-designed article from earlier today about education events this week… But I digress. Schwinn said the resutls will come out earlier in future years, but this is a transition year. Johnson said “some districts are excited to dig in” with releasing data. Lazar explained how teachers are getting “claim spreads” which are tied to “anchor data”. At this point, it’s all Greek to me when they start speaking in that language. The DOE is working with journalists (no one asked me, and I had already received embargoed information at a public meeting) to write articles on how to educate parents on “how to read reports and grade spreads”. Because parents don’t know how to do that. I don’t think parents are confused about the data. They will be confused why Johnny is doing awesome with grades but he tanked the SBAC. And no one will be able to present this to them in a way they will clearly understand so hopefully they will come up with the same conclusion as many parents already have: Smarter Balanced sucks!
At this point, Johnson wanted to play one of the new videos, just released Friday in an email blast to anyone the DOE has worked with (which didn’t include me, but I got it forwarded to me on Friday). So here it is, the world premiere (if you haven’t been so blessed to be included in the email blast), of the Delaware DOE Smarter Balanced Guide For Parents Video 2015:
*video may not be working, I will work on it…
This won’t be the last time you hear this video, because apparently some districts want to put this on their morning announcement! I kid you not…
This next part is actually somewhat frightening. When asked how many hits the DOE website is getting for this, Johnson was unable to answer, but they can track the hits or work with partners on sites they don’t own to get that information. Tracking plays a LARGE part later on in this retreat…
The final part of the presentation was my whole reason for coming: The Delaware School Success Framework. A slide came up from the State Board of Education agenda for Thursday’s meeting, but it had attachments that said “embargoed”. These links don’t appear on the public agenda. There was a lot of whispering between Penny Schwinn, Shana Young, and Donna Johnson at this point, as if they could be discussing something they didn’t want me to hear. I don’t obviously know this for sure, just a hunch! 😉
She went over the state’s new accountability system called the Delaware School Success Framework (DSSF). I covered most of this last week in my Regulation 103 article and how much of a game-changer this system is, but I found out quite a bit of information on it today. The DSSF will go live next month with what they are calling the “paper framework” until the full online system launches by June 2nd (a must date according to Penny Schwinn). Schwinn said the reason they are including 4, 5, and 6 year graduation rates is because of special education students who may not graduate in four years. She proudly said “Delaware is the first state to have college and career preparation” as part of the state report card (which is what the US DOE calls state accountability systems). When talking about the Accountability Framework Working Group (AFWG), Schwinn stated Ryan Reyna is leading this group. She said there is a lot of opinions in this group, and not everyone is going to agree, which makes it a good group. She said no accountability system is going to have 100% agreement, so it took some compromising.
“Delaware has the most aggressive rate in the country for growth,” Schwinn said. This was her explanation for the VERY high portion of the DSSF which has growth. She said it “feels more appropriate with Smarter Balanced to set the bar high.” She acknowledged they are “pushing it with US DOE” but feels they will be approved. How this all works with the DSSF is this. There is a Part A, which counts toward a school’s accountability rating, and Part B which will show on the DOE website and is informative in nature but has no weight on a school’s grade. Part A includes proficiency (multiplied by the school’s participation rate on SBAC), growth to proficiency, college and career prep (for high schools), average daily attendance, and so forth. The numbers have changed somewhat since I last reported on the weights of each category. For elementary and middle schools, 30% of the weight will be proficiency, and high schools will be 25%. For growth, in elementary and middle schools this will be 45%, and high schools 40%. So in essence, 75% of a school’s accountability rating will be based on the Smarter Balanced Assessment in elementary and middle schools, and 65% for high schools. The bulk of the rating system that will determine reward, recognition, action, focus, focus plus and priority status will be based on the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Schwinn said this is very aggressive and is “not comfortable backing down on it.” Not one word was said about the participation rate or Regulation 103 during this presentation. The categories were presented for the ESEA Flex Waiver last March but the weights have to be submitted to the US DOE by 10/31/15. So the State Board has to make a decision on it by their 10/15 meeting.
Reyna talked about proficiency and growth with some scatter graphs. “We’re really valuing schools that are showing growth with students” he said out of thin air. Schwinn talked about the school survey parents will receive (school report card). They are going with the “5 Essentials Survey” for the non-accountability rated Part B. The DOE is creating a survey working group which will start next month and will include the “usual stakeholders”. They sent emails to all the superintendents to participate, just like they did with the AFWG. The state is holding itself accountable as well, but there was no discussion about what they are measuring themselves against. Schwinn explained that on the survey last fall, parents liked the idea of letter grades on the school report and teachers hated it. So they won’t have that on the report. In news I know many will like, THERE WILL BE NO ROCKET SHIPS, TRAFFIC LIGHTS OR TROPHIES on the Delaware School Success Report sent to parents. There was a lot of discussion about design and different ideas. Heffernan said DOE can tell parents “It could have been worse, it could have been rocket ships.”
Schwinn explained on the online report, parents will be able to map and graph data. As an example, Dr. Gray said if a parent is looking for a school that has choir, they will be able to find that, to which Schwinn agreed. Schwinn said “accountability is intended to be a judgment on a school. But we want to make sure parents see other data as well.” Schwinn said they WILL TRACK THE INFORMATION PARENTS SEARCH FOR ON SCHOOLS to see if they can let schools or districts know about needs in their area. Or at least that’s what she said.
Schwinn had to leave to “feed her family” and Reyna took over. They are resetting assessment targets for the state and each subgroup which must be done by 1/31/16. At this point, the next slide Reyna presented had embargoed information at a public meeting (just love saying that!). So I cannot, by threat of force or violence, tell you that the overall state proficiency for SBAC was a little over 51% and for the overall subgroups, it was 38.8% for SBAC. But here is the real kicker. Delaware has to pick their choice to hold the state accountable. With a six year plan, the state must close the proficiency gap between the overall sub-groups (including low-income, students with disabilities, English Language Learners, and minorities) by 50% in six years. This is what Delaware DOE wants. Other choices were all schools are 100% proficient by 2019-2020, or “any other method proposed by state that is educationally sound and results in ambitious but achievable Annual Measurable Objectives for all schools and subgroups.”
Pat Heffernan was not a fan of DOE’s choice because of the impact on students with disabilities. He even made a comment about how they won’t reach this goal either. It was discussed how ALL students will be included in this state accountability rating. The infamous “n” number won’t apply (when students are below 15 at a school in a sub-group, they are NOT counted towards the individual school’s accountability) on this state system since ALL students that are in a sub-group will be included in the state’s rating. But students will not be double-counted. So for example, an African-American student with disabilities will only count towards one of those sub-groups. The DOE must increase the 38.8% for the sub-groups to 45% in six years to meet the state rating with the US DOE.
And with that, the meeting ended since they had already run over time for the meeting, and they used a room at the Duncan Center in Dover.
UPDATED, 9/17/15, 9:34pm: Michael Watson from the Delaware DOE spoke with me at the State Board of Education meeting during a break. He informed me the slide he presented to me at the State Board Retreat was NOT embargoed information, but the name of the upcoming report is. Since I didn’t remember it, it’s a non-issue but I do appreciate him letting me know. As for Ryan Reyna, that’s another story.
The following were put as attachments on the State Board of Education website for the agenda on yesterday’s meeting. Schwinn’s presentation says nothing about the bomb she dropped yesterday concerning the DOE considering replacing the SAT with Smarter Balanced, but the audio released Monday or Tuesday will confirm that one!