For over two years, Delaware citizens wondered why Kathleen Davies was put on leave by Delaware State Auditor Tom Wagner. Now, finally, the truth can be told. Continue reading
Revenge is ugly business. When it takes place at a very high state level and the object of that revenge gets a whole article about it in the state’s biggest newspaper, it is really ugly.
Today, James Fisher and Matthew Albright published an article about the Auditor of Accounts, Kathleen Davies. The article claims Davies was put on leave over two months ago due to not using the state procurement card for travel expenses. According to the story, sources who would only be named as “state employees” contacted the Office of Management and Budget, then run by Ann Visalli, in November of 2015. They alleged Davies spent over $7700 in travel expenses (over four years) and received personal reimbursements instead of using the state p-card. She did do this. But was it wrong? Absolutely not. I’m not buying any of this. Let’s take a close look at what else was going on at the time these “sources” (as the News Journal calls them) filed this complaint.
Davies had just come out with a report on many charter schools, not just Delaware College Prep (the only school mentioned in the article). Kuumba Academy was also named in the report on personal reimbursements as using funds against the accounting policies of the state. Two other charters did not have any inappropriate use of state funds: Odyssey Charter School and Thomas Edison Charter School.
But there was more going on at that time. The reports on Family Foundations Academy and Providence Creek Academy had not come out yet. The September 30th enrollment inspection was just beginning (which was published earlier this Spring and pulled from State Auditor Tom Wagner’s website after Davies was put on leave). Another Delaware charter school, The Delaware Met, was under formal review. Hearings and meetings with the Charter School Accountability Committee took place in November and December of 2015. One of the big questions surrounding Delaware Met was how they were spending their money. And by default, their operation management company, Innovative Schools, would also be looked at.
There was also an inspection released by Davies on December 7th. This surrounded an anonymous tip about Delaware Department of Education employees abusing travel expenses. No wrongdoing was found in the inspection report. But why would the News Journal not mention such an important part of this timeline in their article as well as the actual inspection? If this accusation by sources who have now become “whistleblowers” was made to the OMB in November of 2015, this would have been the same time when Davies would have been working on the DOE travel expense report which came out on December 7th. The timing on this is uncanny!
If it took six months for Davies to be put on leave, what was the OMB doing for six months? Why did Davies just happen to be put on leave at the same time the DOE was pitching a conniption fit about the September 30th Inspection Report written by Davies? The report, published by Wagner’s office on May 5th, can be found here. Why did Wagner pull the report which had absolutely nothing to do with her supposed reasons for being put on leave? Which other pending audits was Davies working on? I do know the answer to a couple of these, especially one that I submitted to the auditor’s office. John Fluharty, the policy analyst from the Auditor of Accounts office, contacted me on March 17th to discuss the tip I sent that office. I talked to him on March 18th with what I knew. No follow-up has taken place since then nor has any report been released on my tip. I find that to be very odd…
And then we have the charter school audit bill crisis. Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams released three different bills in the first part of the 148th General Assembly. The first two were stricken in lieu of the third one which passed the Delaware House on June 30th, 2015. It’s next destination was the Senate Education Committee, chaired by Delaware Senator David Sokola. Prior to the second part of the 148th G.A. beginning last January, rumors began circulating that Sokola was going to introduce his own charter school audit bill. With his friends at the Delaware Charter Schools Network, Sokola crafted new legislation which weakened Williams bill considerably. Williams and Sokola battled publicly on Facebook over the bill, resulting in an eventual compromise a few months later. They both met with Davies, who supported Williams bill, and the Delaware Charter Schools Network. The new legislation, House Bill 435, passed both the House and Senate and awaits Governor Markell’s signature.
But the biggest question is this: what did Davies do that was so wrong, that would warrant such a drastic action? While the guidelines regarding travel expenses published by the News Journal said the state prefers state employees use the p-card, it doesn’t rule out personal reimbursements. Furthermore, the article states she told employees she was doing this. If you have something to hide, you don’t tell everyone in the office!!! The only way she would have been reimbursed for those travel expenses is if someone approved it and saw the receipts. Who approved the expenses? More importantly, where is the fire here?
Davies was not put on leave over this. This is a cover. The whole thing reeks of corruption at a very high level. Tom Wagner won’t talk about it because it’s a personnel issue. So how did the News Journal get the story? I can tell you this: I was contacted by an employee of the Delaware Department of Education who asked me if I heard about Kathleen Davies. This was on May 26th, a week after the September 30th report disappeared. This employee said “word is she had a falling out with Tom Wagner. And won’t be back.” Now I hear from sources all the time about different state employees. But how is that a DOE employee would have intimate knowledge of a situation between Tom Wagner and his second-in-command? And how in the world would they know Davies wouldn’t be returning? That would indicate a conversation took place with someone from the State Auditor’s office with either an employee of the Delaware Dept. of Education or an employee of the State Board of Education for that much knowledge to come out for what we are being told is a “personnel issue”.
This is my firm belief: someone was very frightened about an audit inspection Davies was working on. Something that would make someone or several people look very bad. This person would have to have the power to be able to pull strings with an elected official to get Davies put on personal leave. Because this fabricated nonsense about personal reimbursements is absurd. Other state employees do it. Even our own Governor was mentioned in an audit report for not following state accounting rules with travel. Was he put on leave? Hell no! Was Tom Wagner put on leave when it was announced he “accidentally” let his own house go into foreclosure? Nope.
I’ve been going through all district and charter expenses the past few weeks and I can say with certainty that any travel expense amounts incurred by Davies are a drop in the bucket compared to what they spend. And I seriously questioned one district about an outrageously high amount in one coding area. No response on that one over two weeks later. So why target the one person who has the ability to produce reports that can put others in a very bad light over financial abuse? I believe I just answered my own question. To pull this off, that takes a serious amount of cunning and guile. Someone with pull and motivation. I would have to think Ann Visalli would know that other state employees use personal reimbursements for travel expenses. I don’t know much about her, except to say she resigned shortly after Davies was put on leave. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Who resigned before the budget passed.
As for Kathleen Davies, I hope she gets the vindication she deserves from this oh-so-obvious smear campaign against her. This is a woman who has spent most of her time at the Delaware Auditor of Account’s office finding actual situations of financial abuse and scandal. Most of them have been against charter schools. Delaware Military Academy report in 2013. Academy of Dover, Family Foundations Academy, Kuumba Academy and Delaware College Prep reports in 2015. Providence Creek Academy, EastSide Charter School and Prestige Academy in 2016. And potentially more. But for those reading this smear article on Davies in the News Journal today, they won’t know all of this stuff going on behind the scenes. So if you read this, please share it so all Delawareans can know that Kathleen Davies is deserving of much more respect than this. I am positive she has enemies in this state. Those who expose the truth often do. Those who do wrong fear exposure more than anything. So who did Davies frighten so much that they would go to these lengths to remove her and tarnish her good name?
Updated, 6:12pm, 7/31/16: This article has been updated to reflect there was no wrongdoing on the part of Gateway Lab School in any audit report. This was an error on my end, and I did write an article to apologize to Gateway regarding this.
Avi Wolfman-Arent announced on Facebook yesterday he is moving on from Delaware to greener pastures. Avi was the education reporter for WHYY/Newsworks. He will be joining the Philadelphia branch. I wish him the best of luck!
This is the second education reporter Delaware has lost this year. Matthew Albright with the News Journal is still in Delaware, but he is covering Legislative Hall. Avi gave education a very different perspective in Delaware. I remember the first time I came across him during the entire Family Foundations Academy debacle at the end of 2014. We had our disagreements along the way but I always respected the Wolfman! Some of his articles were nothing I expected but delivered in their thoroughness and research.
We still have the excellent Larry Nagengast and James Dawson here in Delaware, and Albright’s former title at the News Journal was replaced by Brittany Horn. Like Delaware education, people come and go, but it is always interesting to say the least.
With a 5-4 vote, the Delaware Joint Finance Committee came to an agreement on how to use the $28 million remaining from the mortgage settlement funds. According to Matthew Albright with the News Journal, $8.1 million of the funds will be used towards educational programs including the following:
$4 million for after-school homework help in high-poverty schools
$4 million for funding to provide remediation for students who get behind in the early grades
$100,000 to Junior Achievement for school programming for at-risk youth
I have to give credit to State Rep. Joe Miro for being the voice of common sense.
If anyone really thinks the SAIL program is going to be temporary, think again. This is part of the Every Student Succeeds Act. And it all fits in with the dark future of education. More government control of children is taking place before our very eyes. I agree some kids need direction because the quality of their home life is not good. However, this plan has the capability of morphing into something permanent. Kids are in school long enough during the regular day. And we want to extend that?
Here we go again! The opt-out movement is back! And smack dab in the middle of it all is Delaware’s 62 legislators in the House and Senate. Matthew Albright with the News Journal wrote about the Veto Override of House Bill 50. There are some great quotes in here… and then there is Earl…
“If you’re a Democrat, and the governor’s a Democrat, you have to think long and hard, ‘Do I want to override my governor?” said Rep. Earl Jaques, D-Glasgow, chairman of the House Education Committee. “It has to be a really big issue for you to do that.”
Jaques was one of five representatives who voted against House Bill 50. He says parents already have the right to opt out, so he doesn’t understand the need for a new law.
Earl, Earl, Earl… when are you going to get what this is all about? I’ve already put Earl in the no column on this. I don’t expect him to change his vote at all. There is no law when it comes to parents opting out, thus House Bill 50!!! It protects the parents, but it is more than obvious Earl wants to side with the Governor. Luckily, State Rep. John Kowalko is able to comment on this insanity with a breath of fresh air”
“If it’s a good policy, you voted for it because it’s a good policy,” Kowalko said. “That policy does not change its makeup just because the governor has decided that he doesn’t like it. If we start considering another branch of government as dictating to us how our decisions should be made, we are seriously compromising our rights as an independent body.”
State Rep. Mike Ramone is once again thinking this is all about the amount of testing kids take. Mike, I’m going to tell you right now I have never once heard from any parent about any other test but the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Parents don’t want to opt out of any other test but the Smarter Balanced. Once again, those who are pro “assessment inventory” are missing some basic facts. When DCAS was around, it was taken two to three times a year depending on how the students did on the first Spring test. If they didn’t hit proficiency, they had to take it again. That’s when parents were talking about “too much testing”. But what happens when we do get rid of the assessments that do matter in favor of SBAC and the interim assessments that accompany it? Then you will have opt-out and NO assessments that give good feedback. I am not anti-assessment. Like the PTA, I support assessments that give timely feedback with a validated test. I already gave my predictions on the final results for the Assessment Inventory Committee. But Ramone… does he realize what House Bill 50 actually is?
Ramone also said he wants to see a statewide process for opting out, since the current rules are a patchwork of district-by district rules.
A statewide process for opting out? It’s called House Bill 50. It specifically states when schools would receive letters from parents and that students who are opted out need to receive another form of instruction. Does he want us to do it through the DOE? That would be a never-ending nightmare! Let’s not muddy the waters any more Mike. House Bill 50 is what it is. You are either for parental rights or you’re not. At the end of the day, this is what it all boils down to. Something Delaware PTA President Dr. Terri Hodges agrees with:
“The message we’re trying to send is that parents and teachers and the community have spoken,” said Terri Hodges, the PTA’s president. “We are hoping our legislators honor the will of the people and follow their original vote.”
I am already hearing the DOE is talking about Smarter Balanced results coming in before kids leave school for summer. I saw that one coming a mile away! This will be another one of their attempts to dissuade legislators from voting for the override. “Look, parents said they wanted quicker feedback. We’re going to make that happen.” But no matter when the results come in, we have to face facts. The Smarter Balanced Assessment is a BAD test. Period. I am all for getting rid of SBAC for high school juniors. But I am also for getting rid of it for ALL Delaware students. Until that happens, parents will opt out, and there isn’t a damn thing anyone can do about it. Yes, the legislators do need to look at the reasons why. I won’t disagree with that. But talking about it doesn’t do anything for parents. The legislators who voted for the Smarter Balanced Assessment knew there were issues with it. But they voted it in anyways. This is the consequence of that action. Yes, Murphy already bought the test. We all know that. But look at the results. Has it changed anything for our students? Not really. It has brought disruption and chaos to our children’s education. The only ones who support this assessment are the very ones who seem to profit, whether financially or through an illusion of success by having “great scores”.
As for the infamous letter the ten Democrats sent Governor Markell about the SAT replacing the Smarter Balanced Assessment, this is NOT their idea. The Delaware DOE has been talking about this publicly since last May. The College Board is redesigning the SAT to be more like the Smarter Balanced and make it all about the Common Core. So guess what, it’s not like it will be that much of an improvement. Can’t wait to see those SAT scores on top of Delaware’s already horrible scores.
This is a bill that comes down to basic and fundamental parental rights. Meanwhile, over 200 parents have already signed the Delaware PTA Petition. More will sign as well before it is all said and done. This is a battle parents aren’t giving up on. We won’t stop until our rights are protected. I am frankly shocked that some legislators would rather see parents fighting with schools than overriding a ridiculous veto by a Governor who is so entrenched in corporate education reform he can’t see the forest from the trees.
Matt Albright with the Delaware News Journal just wrote an article on Delaware Military Academy looking to expand. During their charter renewal process, Delaware Military Academy (DMA) asked for a modification to increase their enrollment from 566 cadets to 715 over the next five years. To do so, they would need additional facilities to hold the students. They need capital funding to do this. Delaware charter law explicitly states charters in the state do not receive capital funding. Another Delaware charter, Odyssey, was highlighted in the News Journal a couple weeks ago for wanting this as well. Albright wrote:
The school has a plan for how to expand, but it does not know yet how it will pay for it. This is a common concern for charter schools because they do not get capital funding from state government like traditional schools do. That means charters must stretch their budgets if they want to build new facilities or make major renovations.
That is the way the law was written Matt! Come on, you know this. So why are you pandering to the charters? I don’t see you asking citizens to vote yes in traditional school district school referendums. This is just a big advertisement for the legislators. This is how the charter community works. They get the News Journal to write stories about what they are sorely lacking, right before the legislative session begins, in the hopes it will become an “issue”. If I were the Red Clay board, I wouldn’t approve this modification if the school does not have the ability to hold the additional students and doesn’t have the funding available. This is very poor planning on DMA’s part. Crying poor after they submit a modification but before it is even approved shows poor judgment.
A recent bill which passed in the Florida House of Representatives would allow charters in the state to get 40% of the district’s funding for capital costs. The capital funding part was just a part of a larger bill, but the bill had no controversy until the capital funding section was added. Other highlights of the bill include:
The proposal would create the Florida Institute for Charter School Innovation to help new charter schools. It would also make it easier for top-performing charter schools to replicate themselves in high-need areas and specify that charter schools receiving back-to-back Fs would be automatically closed.
This is something Commandant Anthony Pullella, the leader of DMA, is already pushing for.
Pullella isn’t calling for the state to instantly start giving charters as much capital money as it does traditional school districts. But he does believe schools should be able to earn some assistance if they prove they are effective.
He proposes, for example, a graduated system in which a charter could earn 25 percent of a traditional school’s capital funding after five years of proven success. It could progressively earn more the longer it continues to show it is successful.
I could easily see some of the legislators in Delaware trying something similar to what the Florida House just passed. In addition, other parts of the Florida charter bill are taking shape in Delaware. We are seeing this with the Statewide Review of Educational Opportunities. As well, the Wilmington Education Advisory Committee recommended an organization to oversee all the Wilmington charter schools.
Charter schools were required to be models of innovation that local districts could emulate. But the problem with the perceived success Pullella talks about is the fact that this is based on standardized test scores. This is the barometer of all public schools success in Delaware. There is also the question about the school population and how charters select their applicants. Any school can be a success if the application process is flawed and only the best and the brightest are allowed in. This is something quite a few charter schools in Delaware have issues with. Including the biggest: Charter School of Wilmington, another Red Clay authorized charter.
But the big kicker is this: what happens if the school closes? Since charters are considered corporations and they are not state-owned, the property would revert back to that corporation. Any funding a state kicked in would be lost forever. Something Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams brought up in the News Journal article as well:
“What if the school closes? Does the state get the building? It’s kind of a gray area,” she said. “DMA is very popular with parents. But they knew coming into this that that kind of funding was not available to them.”
Chances are we will see that exact situation play out in exactly one week when the State Board of Education will most likely revoke Delaware Met’s charter and have them close after this marking period ends. While the school received no capital funding, they did receive $175,000 as part of the Delaware Charter School Performance Fund. Money from this fund can go to capital costs with very little oversight. We are now seeing, after twenty years of charters siphoning off more and more local school district dollars, Delaware charters wanting to change the playing field even more in their favor. Even though they get tons of money from the Longwood Foundation, they still want more. Based on an illusion of success called standardized test scores. And as usual, they find a public spotlight in the form of the News Journal.
When folks say I am anti-charter, I’m not. I’m all about following the rules. If it isn’t Family Foundations Academy squandering over a million dollars, or Delaware Met’s self-nuking a month after they opened, its stuff like this that drives me crazy about charters. They brag about how great they are and act like they don’t have any money. But DMA apparently had extra money to spend when they went through their own investigation with the Delaware State Auditor’s office a few years ago. And lets not even get into special education at a lot of these charters. They know exactly what I’m talking about, right guys?
I fully expect to see someone, possibly a Republican State Rep. or Senator, to introduce some crazy legislation like this in Delaware during the second part of the 148th General Assembly. The big difference between Florida and Delaware is that the Republicans don’t hold the majority in the First State. My recommendation to Delaware charters: stop whining about what you don’t have and looking for short cuts. You know where to go to get that kind of money, so give the DuPonts a call. Or one of the numerous charter-loving “foundations” or “non-profits” out there. But stop asking an already cash-strapped state for more money. And stop expecting to get more from the local districts. Because at the rate you are “expanding” and “growing”, you are getting more of the local share of school district money than you ever were. But what happens when those districts reach the breaking point, and they are no longer able to pass referendums? Look at Christina as a model of this. Cause if you don’t, you will end up shooting yourselves in the foot.
The one thing charters in Delaware do much better than traditional school districts is parent engagement. I don’t think anyone will contest that. But please, stop brainwashing these parents into reaching out to the media to get your way. The bizarre cult-like fascination with some Delaware parents and charters is bad enough as it is.
As for the News Journal: please stop with your charter loving articles. Yes, you write about the bad too. But you try to bring issues up not because they are truly newsworthy, but because you are getting calls from the charter lobbyists who also happen to be aligned with your biggest advertisers. It’s called bias, and it is well-known throughout the state.
I have to crack up when I read the News Journal these days. In an article about school funding, Matthew Albright with the News Journal started talking about how city kids did on the Smarter Balanced Assessment. But he doesn’t call it by name. This is what he says:
On the state’s tough new standardized test…
Call it by name Matthew Albright! It’s called the Smarter Balanced Assessment! Did Markell call you guys and tell you to call it that cause he doesn’t want people Googling “Smarter Balanced Assessment”? Too bad Jack! They can come here to read the actual words. Own it News Journal! Own it Jack! Especially since Jack said it was “the best test Delaware ever made” last summer at New America. I also see the words Common Core starting to fade in favor of “the state standards”. Stop pussy-footing around and take ownership of the monster you created Jack!
Hey Jack, why no comment on the Delaware Met? You certainly had a lot to say about the priority schools, but we have a school where a student had their hair put on fire and you go strangely mum. Would that be because you don’t want people to see this as YOUR failure? Along with the Smarter Balanced Assessment?
Hey Jack, how is it going? Seriously. We never talk. What are your plans after you leave your Governor job? Inquiring minds want to know. I know you’ve been busy. You know, working the rounds so to speak. Making calls. I get it. You have your plans, and you will do anything to get them completed. I get that. Don’t agree with whatever you are planning I’m sure, but I understand.
By the way Jack, opt-out season is fast approaching so I may jump ahead on it this year. I look forward to the new crazy ideas you come up with in 2016 to try to stop opt-out. They will fail, and I will laugh, but I admire your attempts. It reminds me of a phrase from “It’s A Wonderful Life”. “Every time a bell rings, an angel gets it wings”. Or something like that. You can equate that with the opt-out movement any way you like. Are your opt-out guard dogs ready? They have a big season ahead and they will need to be at the top of their game.
I emailed you the Santa Claus opt-out proclamation, but I didn’t see a response. Maybe you sent one to Santa. Good luck trying to turn that guy over to your side! He sees greed 22,000 miles away! I don’t think Santa is going to opt out of liking opt-out Jack.
I posted some old videos you put up from your 2008 campaign for Governor. Love how you talked about the horrible Delaware student test and how bad it was and teachers need to teach and not to the test. You have come a long way since then Jack. I’m not sure how this went from the News Journal to you Jack, but what the heck! It’s a Saturday night (at the time of this writing), I’m tired, and I like free-writing sometimes. No research, just letting it flow. Alright, if I’m talking about writing, it’s time to bid adieu.
Matthew Albright with the Delaware News Journal wrote an article today about Delaware charters, and centered on Odyssey Charter School. Delaware charter schools face obstacles to growth is the name of the article. I think it’s funny, because many disadvantaged students face obstacles to getting into these “dream” charters like Odyssey, Charter School of Wilmington, Newark Charter School and Sussex Academy. Their student populations always have less African-Americans, students with disabilities and low-income students than those around them. And their cheerleaders always say the same thing: “Their lotteries determine who gets in.” Yeah, and I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you.
School leaders and parents at successful Delaware charter schools say the state can and should do more to help them grow. While understanding that the Department of Education has to crack down on charters showing evidence of financial mismanagement or a failure to provide high quality education, parents and educators wonder: If a school has top test scores, deep community connections and parents clamoring for expansion, can’t the state help?
Did Publius from Kilroy’s Delaware write this article? If a charter school has “top test scores”, which doesn’t mean squat to me because I don’t value any standardized test score as a true measurement of any school, than they have trimmed the fat and picked the better students and essentially recruited (stolen) them from their local districts.
Albright talks about Odyssey’s latest money problems, something I wrote about six days ago. But of course, Albright, being a reporter for a somewhat major metropolitan newspaper would get more information. I’m just a blogger! Should Odyssey get more money from the state? Hell no! Charters wanted to have it their way, but when they can’t get things their way, they call the State. Enough. They get more financial perks from non-profits and loop-holes in the budget to make up for what they don’t get from the state.
Charter skeptics maintain that the state shouldn’t spend a cent more on charters while traditional school districts cry out for more resources to serve at-risk students. They argue charters don’t serve enough of the kids who need the state’s help the most, and every dollar that goes to a charter is a dollar less for districts charged with that mission.
Damn straight! Some schools are literally falling apart, and Odyssey and other charters want more? After they have siphoned money and students away from their local districts? Sorry, you missed the boat. Why don’t they call the Longwood Foundation? They are always giving away money to charters. Delaware State Rep. John Kowalko got the Albright call and didn’t mince words:
“Until you can prove to me, and I mean show me proof on a piece of paper, that these schools are taking in the same kind of students as our districts and doing a better job, then maybe we have a different discussion,” Kowalko said. “Until then, it is unconscionable for us to be sending additional taxpayer dollars to them.”
Why would we give more money to a school that is facing this on their latest financial framework with the DOE:
The problems reported include deficits, high debt-to-asset ratios, low cash reserves and negative cash flow over the past three years.
So we give them a get out of jail free card while Christina bleeds? I don’t see the state rushing to help them. And the article even has Kendall Massett with the Delaware Charter Schools Network joining the fray! I’m not sure when she finally figured out there were other schools in Delaware aside from charters, but I’m not sure I buy what she wrote:
“If any public school, not just a charter, is doing great things for kids, we should be enabling them to do more of it,” Massett said. “Odyssey is a great example of that.”
The timing on this is impeccable. The DOE and Donna Johnson will be presenting to the State Board on the Statewide Review of Educational Opportunities. This is the strategy to “determine how charters operate in Delaware” along with all the other great programs our schools offer. Another US DOE non-regulatory non-Congressionally approved “suggestion”.
During the last legislative session, lawmakers approved a moratorium on new charters until June of 2018, or until the state finishes a comprehensive strategic plan that would address how charters fit into the state’s overall public education system.
If anyone really thinks there will be a moratorium on charters until 2018, they are smoking something funny. Once the State Board celebrates Donna and the DOE’s hard work and does their high-five party, the charter applications will flow.
Matthew Albright with the Delaware News Journal finally jumped on the Delaware Met story three days after this blog broke the news about it’s pending closure. The article does not state the school is closing because the board is meeting tonight to decide if they should hand in their charter. I would fully expect a mainstream media source to take this route. However, I do take offense to this part:
Rumors circulated through the weekend that Delaware Met had already made the decision to close. Students did not attend school Friday – Harrington said the school scheduled professional development for teachers – but kids were back Monday.
“We’ve been trying to get the message out to parents that no decision has been made, but they keep hearing people saying it’s already happened,” Harrington said. “It isn’t helping.”
Why would Albright only contact the school about this? There was no mention of the Delaware Department of Education who I’m sure would have been notified. As well, he knew what the source of the “rumors” was and I never heard from him. But he was up in Philly for the Papal Visit. Mr. Harrington, you could have easily contacted me as well, but the school did not respond to my two emails on Friday. Nor did the Department of Education.
Is this school a special education school? Calling it a “Big Picture School” is not indicative of what has been going on there.
Second, the board will decide whether the school can get a handle on problems with school climate. Harrington said there have been fights and incidents in which students have been disrespectful towards school staff.
“We’re talking about kids acting out,” Harrington said. “Our board’s and leadership’s priority is making sure we can provide a safe environment for our students.”
Part of providing a safe environment for students is having a firm handle on student’s Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) prior to the start of school. Being that there was no board meeting in August, I would really have to wonder how prepared this school was for opening day. I do have a lot of respect for Ed Emmett from Positive Outcomes, and he could be a valuable source for helping the school understand special education issues. But I think their financial issues may be beyond just an enrollment issue. How much are they paying to Innovative Schools for rent? Since they have NO financial information on their website (which they are required to do monthly as per Delaware law), how could anyone ascertain what their financial picture is?
I also have to question the role Innovative Schools plays in Delaware education. Their name has been attached to far too many charters that close or have huge financial issues at some point. Is it time to reel them in for a serious investigation? And of course Kendall Massett with the Delaware Charter Schools Network is riding in for the rescue. But is it too late? Given everything I have written about this school in the past few days I would be very concerned as a parent of a teenager attending this school. Conflicts of Interest are as transparent as Saran Wrap and this school has red flags all over it.
Let the games begin! Delaware Governor Jack Markell signed Senate Bill 122 and House Bill 148 into law today at the Hockessin Colored School. Joined by city and state leaders, these articles of legislation will allow for the creation of the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission (WEIC) and the redistricting of Wilmington district lines by the State Board of Education. Any plans the State Board comes up with will be subject to approval by the 148th General Assembly.
Delawareonline, in an article written by their education reporter Matthew Albright, published the news and a video earlier today. Albright said WEIC will be chaired by Tony Allen, the Bank of America executive who also chaired the Wilmington Education Advisory Committee (WEAC), and will have assistant chairs consisting of Kenny Rivera, the President of the Red Clay Consolidated School District Board of Education and Elizabeth Lockman, a parent advocate who also served on WEAC.
The plan will move the City of Wilmington schools out of the Christina School District into the hands of Red Clay Consolidated School District. Some, including myself, have wondered if there are ulterior motives at play from Governor Markell, city leaders, some state legislators, the Delaware Department of Education, and the State Board of Education. I’ve always hypothesized there is a secret plan to increase the number of charters in Wilmington or make it an all-charter district.
The bottom line is it will come down to funding. The state of Delaware is already projected to have a $160-$170 million dollar deficit in next year’s budget. So where will the money come from for this redistricting? I can picture corporations wanting to donate funds, or non-profits like Rodel or the Longwood Foundation. They will have stipulations for these funds, which could change the overall plan for the redistricting. Yes, it needs legislative approval, but what if there is already a consensus among our state legislators? This is conspiracy theory at it’s maximum for a state like Delaware, and I pray I’m wrong. But if the DOE is already reneging on the promised priority school amount for Red Clay, how can the state assure adequate and proper funding for this endeavor?
“As I have said many times, the only way this all works is if Red Clay has a seat at the table as decisions are being made, is properly funded for taking on greater responsibility and is given a reasonable timetable that we all agree to,” Allen said.
What will be important for Red Clay is to make sure they have a seat at the table and they are not what’s on the table!
Governor Markell has less than a year and a half left in his term as Delaware Governor, and he will want to leave his “legacy” on Delaware. The question looms over what that legacy will be, and if it will be for the people of Delaware or corporate interests and the privatization of our schools. I like Tony Allen, and I want to think he is being true to his word on all of this, but there is just way too much that hasn’t been planned or answered in regards to this. The Wilmington Education Improvement Commission will hopefully provide many of those answers.
Based on the video Delawareonline provided, in attendance were the following: Governor Markell, Tony Allen, WEAC Vice Chair Dan Rich, State Rep. Charles Potter, State Rep. Earl Jaques, State Senator Margaret Rose Henry, Kenny Rivera, Elizabeth Lockman, Kendall Massett (Executive Director of the Delaware Charter Schools Network), Karen Eller (Christina School District teacher and WEAC member), Delaware PTA Vice-President for Advocacy Yvonne Johnson, State Board of Education member Gregory Coverdale, Red Clay Consolidated Superintendent Merv Daugherty, WEAC member and legislative aide Meghan Wallace, legislative aide Mark Rucci, and many others. If anyone wants to add names that I missed or don’t know, feel free to comment or email me.
House Bill 50 is waiting. No action has been taken by Delaware Governor Jack Markell on the parent opt-out legislation. Matt Albright with the News Journal spoke with Jonathan Dworkin, the spokesman for Governor Markell, and wrote yesterday:
“Markell has not asked for H.B. 50 to be delivered to his desk yet, Dworkin said. Once he receives the bill, he has 10 days to veto it; if he doesn’t, it becomes law with or without his signature.
That means the Legislature would have to wait for a veto override vote until next year unless they call a special session, which is unlikely.”
I checked Delaware state code, and found the following:
“Section 18. Every bill which shall have passed both Houses of the General Assembly shall, before it becomes law, be presented to the Governor;”
The key part concerning this seems to be “presented to the Governor”. Whose job is it to present a bill to Markell? The last place House Bill 50 sat in was the Delaware Senate and they passed the bill a week ago today. I contacted Markell’s office, and they indicated he has ten days to take action on a bill, but when I asked specifically about the bill being “presented”, they did not have an answer but did indicate they would check on that aspect as well as the status of the bill and would get back to me either later today or Monday since their offices are closed tomorrow.
Meanwhile, other education bills passed both the Delaware House and Senate and are also awaiting a signature from Markell. In no short order:
House Bill 91, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Rep. Sean Matthews, Synopsis: This bill involves the public school immunization program. Currently, the Affidavit of Religious Belief does not expressly alert parents or guardians who file for the religious exemption from the program that the child will be temporarily excluded from school in the event of an epidemic of a vaccine preventable disease. This bill amends the required affidavit so parents or guardians are directly made aware of the possibility of the child’s temporary exclusion from school. The bill also adds that the asserted cause of a medical exemption may be subject to review and approval by the Division of Public Health. Additionally, the bill would require the Division of Public Health to declare an outbreak, rather than the current language of an epidemic throughout the State or a particular definable region thereof.
House Joint Resolution #6 w/House Amendment #1, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Rep. Earl Jaques, This House Joint Resolution directs the DPAS II Advisory Committee to review and make recommendations to the current educator evaluation system. This Resolution also limits the State Department of Education’s ability to propose changes to certain sections of the Administrative Code.
Senate Bill #61, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator David Sokola, This Act clarifies that school buses are not exempt from the requirement to stop at railroad grade crossings regulated by a traffic-control signal or at railroad grade crossings protected by crossing gates or flashing lights. Section 4163 currently is contrary to best safety practices requiring that school buses stop at these types of crossings to ensure optimal safety for students.
This Act also makes additional changes to § 4163 in keeping with the grammar and style guidelines of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
Senate Bill #62, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator David Sokola, This Act updates the minimum insurance coverage requirements for school transportation to reflect current industry standards.
Senate Bill #94, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator Brian Bushweller, This Act requires the Department to develop a regulation for the identification of a “military-connected youth”. The Act further provides that this identification is not a public record, is protected by the federal Family Educational and Privacy Act and shall not be used for purposes of determining school achievement, growth or performance. The purpose of this identification is to ensure the necessary individuals at the school level are aware of any military connected youth for services and supports.
Senate Concurrent Resolution #29, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator Bethany Hall-Long, This concurrent resolution establishes the Behavioral and Mental Health Task Force to examine mental health in the State of Delaware and make recommendations for the improvement of services and the mental healthcare system. *editor’s note: while this is not a direct education bill, many students would benefit from a better mental health care system in the state
Senate Concurrent Resolution #39, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator Colin Bonini, This Concurrent Resolution forms a working group to make a recommendation as to whether or not the Budget Bill should continue to be treated as a simple majority Bill. *editor’s note: this working group will take a hard look at funding for charter schools, University of Delaware, and Delaware State University. Since they are considered corporations under state law, and corporations need a 3/4 majority vote for passage, and currently the budget bill only needs a majority vote, this group will examine this legal anomaly.
Senate Joint Resolution #2 w/Senate Amendment #1, passed 7/1, Sponsors: Senator David Sokola and Rep. Earl Jaques, The amount of testing required of our students and educators has grown significantly in recent years. While the General Assembly recognizes the need to administer assessments that provide valid and reliable data about how Delaware’s students are growing academically, it is also committed to maximizing time in the classroom for our educators to teach, and our students to learn.
The Department of Education is already coordinating an inventory of all assessments required at the state, district, and school level. This Joint Resolution requires the Department of Education to report the inventory results, and any assessments that districts or the state propose to eliminate, to the public and to the House and Senate Education Committees of the General Assembly. It also requires the Department to convene a group, consisting of members of the General Assembly and the public, to conduct an in-depth review of the inventory results and make recommendations for consolidation or elimination of assessments.
Senate Joint Resolution #4, passed 7/1, Sponsor: Senator David Sokola, While Delaware is deeply committed to preparing every child to reach his or her full potential and succeed in the new economy, the State will not be able to build a world-class education system for its children without modernizing the 70-year-old education funding system. This Joint Resolution establishes the Education Funding Improvement Commission to conduct a comprehensive review of Delaware’s public education funding system and make recommendations to modernize and strengthen the system. The Commission will include stakeholders from across the education system and will submit a report and recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly no later than March 31, 2016.
House Bill #184, passed 6/30, Sponsor: Rep. Deb Heffernan, This bill establishes a mechanism for persons receiving special education services pursuant to an active Individual Education Plan until the age of 21 to receive license to drive.
House Joint Resolution #7, passed 6/30, Sponsor: Rep. Kim Williams, Recognizing (1) that many of our educators are assuming greater levels of responsibility and demonstrating leadership in their classrooms and schools, (2) that our current educator compensation system does not reflect the work we value in our educators or provide them with a meaningful career pathway or ability to earn additional compensation for assuming additional responsibility, and (3) that we must retain and attract great educators to ensure that our students are prepared to compete in an increasingly global economy, this bill re-establishes the Committee to Advance Educator Compensation and Careers in addition to establishing two sub-committees: the Educator Work Group and the Technical Advisory Group. The Committee will continue its work in developing a plan for an alternative compensation structure and career pathway for educators aligned with the parameters set forth in Senate Bill No. 254, including providing educators with a meaningful career pathway, including higher starting salaries and recognition for working with high-needs students, and significant leadership opportunities for career advancement that keeps talented educators in the classroom. The Committee must submit updated recommendations to the Governor by March 31st, 2016 with sufficient detail for implementing legislation, and will continue to meet thereafter to issue subsequent recommendations for consideration.
I will be updating the page on this blog entitled “Education Bills in the 148th General Assembly” over the next week and as Markell makes decisions on these as well. I also intend to go through all the legislation that was passed over and is left in limbo until January 2016.
“We believe this lack of confidence is due to a failure to engage the education community in a shared decision-making process and the failure of the leadership of the Department to implement reform without creating trust.” -Kevin Carson, Executive Director of the Delaware Association of School Administrators (DASA)
In a Delaware News Journal article published last night, nine out of ten Delaware school administrators that voted on a survey showed no confidence in the Delaware Department of Education. They join the Delaware State Educators Association and their local chapters in the Christina and Red Clay school districts, the Delaware PTA in regards to the Smarter Balanced Assessment, several legislators, and several parents in the state.
The DOE responded to the survey in a statement by their spokeswoman, Alison May:
“If we had to choose between making extraordinary progress together and avoiding controversy, we would choose progress for our students every time.”
It is the very nature of this progress that is the rudimentary question these days. Many folks in Delaware do not see standardized assessments as a true measure of progress for students. With the roll-out of Smarter Balanced this year, this feeling has only intensified as the test has not been validated nor does it offer an actual growth model.
As well, the DOE seems to thrive on controversy these days and are not engaging in true stakeholder input. Perhaps they are just putting on a tin shell to defend themselves from all the potshots that are lobbed their way with statements like these, but it certainly doesn’t help their cause.
Another strong indictment against the DOE by DASA is the fact that the DOE has “flawed systems for evaluating teachers and schools and has stumbled to find a better way to pay educators,” according to the article written by Matthew Albright.
Relations between the DOE and the most essential stakeholders in the state have deteriorated to an all-time low. When the most important groups in education have NO confidence in the rigorous work you are doing, at what point do the light bulbs finally turn on? Will the entire state have to endure Secretary Mark Murphy until Governor Markell leaves office?
“And we’re not being honest with kids about what they need to be proficient.”
In an article in the News Journal, Governor Markell said there is an “honesty gap” between state standardized tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. First off, with all the news going on with education in Delaware, how is it that reporter Matthew Albright’s biggest education news of the day yesterday was a conference call with Markell, Achieve, and the Collaboration for Student Success? I can think of at least three dozen other matters that are more newsworthy.
Governor Markell is scrambling. So are the big education reform companies. They will say and do anything to attempt to gain the trust back in their corporate education reform agenda. Now they are tackling the biggest problem they will have in the next three months: when the scores come back on the Smarter Balanced Assessment. What Markell and Achieve don’t mention in this article is how Achieve is in a contract with the Delaware Department of Education right now with the Assessment Inventory initiative. This was Markell’s rocket science idea to get rid of other assessments to justify the Smarter Balanced.
When the issue of parent opt-out came up during this conference call, Achieve President Michael Cohen said:
“While we’re here talking about making sure parents get honest, accurate measures of performance, parents are actually opting to get no information about their performance,”
You are absolutely right Mr. Cohen. The parents who are opting their children out do not trust the test or Governor Markell. Teachers don’t trust it either. Sure, maybe the chosen few who become Teachers of the Year or become part of the Rodel Round Table over at Camelot, aka 100 W. 10th St. in Wilmington. These are the dying embers of a failed policy, but Markell is too stubborn or too invested to just throw water over them and just let it cool down. This is his Achilles Heel. Whenever his baby is threatened, he pulls these stunts. And this widens the gap between himself and the rest of us.
Where is the honesty with the Smarter Balanced Assessment Governor Markell? Teachers can’t see the test beforehand, and they don’t see the answers the students give or the actual graded tests. Parents don’t see it either, but they are supposed to trust a score? But this is okay to measure schools and teachers? I don’t see a lot of honesty in that Governor. So keep peddling your proficiency measure like some guy selling Rolex watches in New York City, and us parents will continue to opt our kids out. The debate is over, but you are too foolish to realize it.
Matt Albright, you are better than this. Stop taking phone calls from the Governor and start covering real education stories.
There were many seminal moments on the road to this important victory for parents in Delaware. I’ll start at the beginning:
1) Delaware bloggers Kavips and Transparent Christina begin talking about opt-out in the Spring of 2014. It’s who got me to start thinking about it for Delaware.
2) Matt Lindell and the Capital School Board: a year ago, the Capital school board started the discussion on this, but it was tabled. Then it came roaring back last fall for a unanimous vote by the Capital Board.
3) The Delaware DOE letters: In early December of 2014, the Delaware DOE began sending school districts a “suggested” letter to give to parents about opt-out should they ask or opt-out. The confusing Delaware state code regarding this was exposed immediately by yours truly. It took a while for this to be clarified by the DOE, but once the genie was out of the bottle, it made the DOE look ineffective
4) Delaware State Rep. Kowalko and Senator Lawson introduce House Bill 50 in early February. WDEL radio show host Rick Jensen starts having opt-out advocates on his show.
5) The Delaware PTA holds the first Delaware Parent Opt-Out Town Hall in mid-February. Wide discussion about bullying tactics by school districts really ticks parents off. What was meant to be a scare tactic fast turns into a rallying point for Delaware parents. President Terri Hodges announces publicly she is opting her own child out.
6) Delaware State Rep. Earl Jaques tells a group of Christina Educator Association teachers House Bill 50 will never pass as Brandywine Superintendent Dr. Mark Holodick attempts to dictate terms about opt-out to parents in that district which does not work out as planned.
7) Delaware PTA holds Kent County Parent Opt-Out Town Hall in early March. DOE is forced to admit parent opt-out can’t be stopped and the state law only applies to teachers and school staff, not parents.
8) Christina board of Education passes parent opt-out resolution in large measure due to the hard work in preparing the resolution by board member Elizabeth Paige and a fiery speech supporting parent opt-out by board member John Young.
9) Governor Markell announces initiative to reduce assessments for Delaware students while conveniently ignoring the elephant in the room, the Smarter Balanced Assessment. This leads to Jaques referring to Smarter Balanced as a “little test”.
10) Governor Jack Markell is forced to talk about opt-out at Howard High School, which leads to remarks by Jaques which fans the opt-out flames even more, especially for special needs parents. Jaques quickly apologizes.
11) The Delaware News Journal publishes a front-page cover story on opt-out from both sides of the fence. A cover photo of parent Jackie Kook with her daughter brings it home for many parents. Parent who never heard the words opt-out start looking into it.
12) In front of an audience of over 1,000 people at the Imagine Delaware forum, teacher and President of the Red Clay Educator Association Mike Matthews announces he supports the opt-out movement.
13) As the Smarter Balanced Assessment begins, parents start opting out by the hundreds in Delaware. Many schools give parents a rough time, which causes parents to talk to each other and spread the news about opt-out.
14) Delaware State Rep. Sean Matthews and Jaques go head to head in a News Journal dual opinion piece on opt-out. Matthews clearly wins the contest and shows why opt-out is important in regards to Delaware education.
15) Both Red Clay and Christina Educators Association hold joint press conference announcing no confidence vote in Delaware DOE, the State Board of Education, and Secretary of Education Mark Murphy.
16) Delaware PTA passes resolution officially supporting opt-out and House Bill 50.
17) DSEA (Delaware Educators Association) passes resolution supporting opt-out and House Bill 50, as well as a vote of no confidence in Mark Murphy.
18) Parent Press Conference/Rally at Legislative Hall in early April, though small, draws most Delaware media to it and more media coverage of opt-out.
19) Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams publicly announces she is opting out her own son, a high school junior who, like many Delaware juniors, are forced to take weeks and weeks of testing.
20) Mark Murphy appears on The Delaware Way with Larry Mendte and states “parents aren’t allowed to opt-out students”.
21) Red Clay Consolidated School Board passes parent opt-out resolution with excellent writing by board member Adrianna Bohm.
22) The day before the House Education Committee vote, Governor Markell announces initiative to have Smarter Balanced Scores tie into elimination of remedial classes for four Delaware universities and colleges. The announcement is critically slammed by legislators, parents and teachers.
23) At the House Education Committee meeting on April 22nd, Kowalko and Jaques battle each other as Kowalko is forced to answer a barrage of questions by Jaques. Kowalko successfully fends him off. After discussion from other legislators, public comment from parents shows near overwhelming support for the release of the bill. Opposition includes organizations well-known to support Governor Markell’s corporate education agendas. After a vote to have the bill tabled falls apart, the bill is released from the committee in an 8-4 vote ending the over two hour debate.
24) Mark Murphy’s claim of federal funding cuts of $40-$90 million over potential opt-outs and the passage of House Bill 50 is debunked the next day with the release of the US DOE letter which clearly states schools cannot opt students out, and the letter never mentions the words parent opt-out.
25) Last week, organizations such as GACEC and Council for Persons with Disabilities release near identical letter in opposition to House Bill 50 with claims that are quickly debunked.
26) In a hasty and damaging example of executive overreach, Governor Markell announces to radio host Rick Jensen on WDEL he will veto House Bill 50 if it reaches his desk.
27) Parents begin emailing all the legislators of the Delaware House and public support for the bill is clearly seen by the legislators.
28) State Rep. Sean Matthews introduces an amendment to House Bill 50 the day of the House vote which changes the language of the legislation from “the state assessment” to the “Smarter Balanced Assessment”.
All leading to today’s enormous victory in the Delaware House of Representatives, with a 36-3 victory with two reps absent. At the end of the day, this is about parents using their voice to initiate change. This could not have been done by one individual at all. It took a great deal of advocacy, hard work, sweat, social media, and legislators, parents, organizations and ordinary citizens spreading the word and supporting the cause.
What also helped were some obvious tactical blunders by the Delaware DOE, Secretary Murphy, and Governor Markell. And God bless him, we cannot forget Earl Jaques. He revealed today House Bill 50 got in the way of his planned legislation to reduce the Smarter Balanced Assessment to only three grades of testing. Which is a noble gesture, but legislation getting rid of the “little” test would be a much grander statement.
While getting the bill through the House was an undertaking, it remains to be seen how the Delaware Senate will receive the legislation. Folks are already guessing which Senate members will support the bill. Delaware Senator Brian Pettyjohn already announced on Facebook tonight he will vote yes. Senator Lawson, a co-sponsor of the bill, is a lock. But the others are a mystery for now. I can guess and predict, but until they publicly announce their intentions or a vote, we must email them and call them as much as we can.
I got home from the Red Clay board meeting tonight where they passed the parent opt out resolution and I figured the News Journal would have something on it since their education reporter Matt Albright was in attendance at the meeting. Nope, not one word, or even a tweet about it. So I decided I should not only email him about this, but also post this as an article so Delaware parents can start to see beyond what is reported in our largest newspaper.
Red Clay Parent Opt Out Resolution
Today at 12:53 AM
To: Matthew Albright (email@example.com)
I went to say hi to you after the Red Clay board meeting tonight, but you had already left. I have to say I was a bit upset to see the News Journal had a huge story on the Conrad Alumni/Redskins controversy, but absolutely nothing on the huge parent opt out resolution the board unanimously passed. As we both know, House Bill 50 will be heard at the House Education Committee next Wednesday, and I would think having the second largest district in the state supporting parent opt out would be something newsworthy for the News Journal. Especially since they could be poised to become the largest district if the redistricting of Wilmington schools does happen.
This is the kind of bias that is unfair to parents in Delaware. You wrote a huge article on the “remedial classes” and Smarter Balanced Assessment announcement yesterday by Governor Markell, but the fact that one of the districts is taking that initiative and stating parents rights are more important than anything associated with standardized testing shows this bias. As a blogger, I’m biased to my side of things, but as a journalist with the biggest newspaper in the state, I expect more balanced coverage of newsworthy events. Especially when it comes to the students of Delaware. For far too long, we have seen the News Journal often give more weight to Markell and DOE opinions than the voice of the citizens of Delaware. I truly hope you will consider this in the future.
It is not Mark Murphy. This honor belongs to Brandywine Superintendent Dr. Mark Holodick. According to a Delawareonline report issued today with a top ten list of the state’s highest paid employees, Holodick made $215,043.72 in 2014. Even our own Governor Markell ranked at 85th on the list with his income of $171,000.03. This seems like a very large salary for a district superintendent.
In 2014, Delaware Online listed all state employees making over $100,000. This list can be found here: http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2014/04/05/data-top-state-salaries/7312283/
I went through the list for each charter and school district listed, and pulled out the following:
Noel Rodriguez, Academy of Dover, $119,432
Matthew Burrows, Appoquinimink, $152,660, 31 over $100k
Mark Holodick, Brandywine, $214,176, 71 over $100k
Kevin Fitzgerald, Caesar Rodney, $162,547, 26 over $100k
Robert Fulton, Cape Henlopen, $154,821, 32 over $100k
Michael Thomas, Capital, $199,564, 35 over $100k
Samuel Paoli, Charter School of Wilmington, $116,368, 3 over $100k
Freeman Williams, Christina, $192,088, 108 over $100k
Dorothy Linn, Colonial, $185,724, 54 over $100k
Charles Hughes, DE Academy of Public Safety, $129,433
Angela Dennis, Delaware College Prep, $115,448
Anthony Pullela, Delaware Military Academy, $111,777
David Ring, Delmar, $139,260, 3 over $100k
Mark Murphy, DOE, $160,144.92, 58 over $100k
Lamont Browne, EastSide Charter, $143,633
Tennell Brewington, Family Foundations Academy, $127,418, 2 over $100k
Susan Bunting, Indian River, $165,885, 21 over $100k
David Curry, Lake Forest, $147,374, 12 over $100k
John Ewald, Laurel, $138,660
Phyllis Koehl, Milford, $146,897, 14 over $100k
Linda Jennings, MOT Charter, $125,845, 3 over $100k
Victoria Gehrt, New Castle Co. Vo-Tech, $184,433, 43 over $100k
Greg Meece, Newark Charter School, $153,788, 4 over $100k
Nick Manolakos, Odyssey Charter, $115,423
Deborah Zych, Polytech, $152,365, 8 over $100k
Audrey Erschen, Providence Creek, $112,679
Mervin Daugherty, Red Clay, $174,931, 103 over $100k
Shawn Joseph, Seaford, $172,502.24, 12 over $100k
Deborah Wicks, Smyrna, $151,645, 17 over $100k
Allen Stafford, Sussex Academy, $106,604
Allen Lathbury, Sussex Tech, $164,361, 14 over $100k
Salome Thomas-EL, Thomas Edison Charter, $133,486
Heath Chasanov, Woodbridge, $135,544, 7 over $100k
It’s become obvious the number of districts and charter schools in Delaware has caused a great deal of money to go towards administrative positions. For a state with three counties, we have 19 school districts, and many charters. Even Matt Denn, now Attorney General, spoke out on this issue in 2012:
“A report issued by Lt. Gov. Matt Denn in 2012 found that if all school districts spent as much money on “direct educational services” as the top five, the state would free up an addition $2.1 million for classrooms.
“We’re still spending too much on administration versus classroom, both at the state level and at the district level,” said Denn, adding that districts should explore ways to share administrative functions.”
In my opinion, I completely agree with Denn’s position on this, as written by Matthew Albright for the News Journal in a link found here: http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2014/04/05/state-employees-earned-k-last-year/7355333/
This state has an extreme amount of bloated salaries, but I don’t see the benefits for this money going to the students. Perhaps it’s time for more than just a look at Wilmington’s school districts…
An individual transcribed the complete Delaware Parent Teachers Association Parent Opt Out Town Hall from February 19th. Transcription is a very difficult endeavor. I’ve done it before, and it is time-consuming at best. The longest I’ve ever done it for was a forty-five minute meeting. This person did it for a two-hour meeting with multiple participants. I posted the part with “Mr. Brandywine” yesterday, but this also has this individual’s conversation with him afterwards.
If you are on the fence about opting your child out, this is an essential document for you to read. If you will never do so, you may want to read this anyways to find the “true value” of these tests.
The News Journal has just announced the Delaware Department of Education has given an ultimatum: close your three priority schools, convert them to a charter, or hand them over to a management company. They have until February 27th to comply.
Matthew Albright’s article is not shocking. I’ve expected this response for quite a while. Now the fun begins! There’s this little thing called the Christina Educators Association. This is called union-busting, and Governor Markell will not gain any new friends over this. I think it’s time the Christina Board of Education deployed their “nuclear option”.
The Christina School Board must choose by Feb. 27 whether to close its three Priority Schools or hand them over to charter schools or other education management organizations, the Department of Education has said in a letter to district staff sent Tuesday.
The decision comes after a contentious, months-long back and forth between the state and the Christina School Board.
Announced in September, Priority Schools is the state’s effort to improve six inner-city Wilmington schools in the Christina and Red Clay school districts with some of the state’s lowest test scores. State officials want to get elite school leaders in place, free them from most district rules and split about $2.8 million among the schools to fund innovative changes.
Christina’s three Priority Schools are Stubbs and Bancroft elementary schools and Bayard Middle School.
The plans have encountered outrage and stiff resistance, especially in Christina. Many educators feel the state is blaming them for low test scores when they say the real problems are systemic poverty and violence.
Last week, Christina School Board voted not to approve turnaround plans for the schools. Board members said they wanted more clarity on how teachers would be selected to staff the schools, saying they were convinced current school staff were the best people to lead improvements. They said they did not want to approve plans that could make it easier for teachers to be fired or transferred.
For more reaction from local officials and educators, keep watching DelawareOnline.com and read tomorrow’s edition of The News Journal.
Transparent Christina has an actual copy of the letter posted here: https://transparentchristina.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/showdown-2-0-let-the-union-busting-begin/
As pointed out by a brilliant commenter on Kilroy’s Delaware, Eastside Charters huge “gains” aren’t as transparent as we originally thought. This criteria was based on a 2010-2011 3rd grade class of 62 students compared to the same class which only had 29 students in the 2012-2013 year. How in the hell can you compare the two? You can’t. How do we know some of the lower scoring DCAS students didn’t choice out or leave the school for some reason? Someone has some explaining to do….
More bogus claims from the DOE and Markell to justify the priority schools. And reported by Matthew Albright with the News Journal a few times, including a huge article today. And the governor says comparing schools is making excuses… Stop the madness Markell. Your comments are being exposed for the fraud they are every single day!!!!! People are going to start wondering why you are pushing so damn hard on this a week and a half before January 7th.
In reading Matthew Albright’s News Journal article on the Priority Schools from Thanksgiving, it’s very clear there are some “read between the lines” parts of the article. The most glaring is the parts by Deputy Superintendent Hugh Broomall:
“We’ve been able to work collaboratively with the Department of Education and our school communities to come up with a plan that we think is in the best interest of these schools and their students,” Deputy Superintendent Hugh Broomall said.
This sounds good, right? The key words are “school communities”. This does not show the overall community. Part of the whole reason for needing more time was to work with the overall community. Something Christina School District has done. But Albright goes on to say this:
Broomall encouraged anyone in the affected schools’ communities to read the plan and reach out to the district if they have concerns.
So Red Clay is going to write their plan without any input from parents and members of the community? This sounds absurd! It tells me they are going to comply with the Delaware DOE as much as humanly possible. I think Markell would relax a bit on the $160,000 requirement for a school leader but I highly doubt he is going to allow these schools to keep their complete staff. It is my opinion that unless these schools comply with the original Memorandum of Understanding, Markell is going to take all six schools as soon as possible after December 31st.
If I were a teacher at any single one of these priority schools, especially in Red Clay, I would be very worried. I have to believe Red Clay Educators Association President Mike Matthews would absolutely refuse to sign onto anything that would involve teachers losing their jobs or even reapplying for their jobs. But are Markell’s demands, based on Federal ESEA regulations, a union-busting move? Markell, despite what I think of him, is a very shrewd and calculating man. I doubt he would go into this without thinking he has all his bases covered. Adding to that notion is something else Albright wrote based on Broomall’s words:
Broomall said the district needs to iron out an agreement with the union that would determine what happens if a teacher wants to stay at one of the Priority Schools but the school leader or district doesn’t think they would be a good fit.
No matter what Red Clay decides, it sounds like authority would be given primarily to the school leader. Depending on who this leader is, if they are like most of the DOE “leaders”, it will be someone from the charter school industry or the fast-track teacher companies the DOE is obsessed with these days. If Red Clay’s agreement agrees to cede all the power to this school leader, it will be very harmful to the existing teachers.
We will find out in the next month what the fates of these schools might be. I sincerely hope something happens in the meantime that prevents any action Markell may take. Mike Matthews did a public FOIA request for any email containing the names of the priority schools, turnaround school, parternership zone school, and more a couple weeks ago at the DOE State Board of Education meeting. He received a response from the DOE indicating an overwhelming amount of money to comply, with a $300 start-up fee. Matthews is looking at another source to help cover funding for this.
Should the DOE, Markell, and Murphy take all six priority schools AND Gateway Lab School, expect a public outcry like this administration has never seen. Other school districts in the state will be even more untrusting of this cabal of terror. Parents will know without any doubt no school is safe, and it is all a power grab.