Fraud & Cover-Up Evade Transparency Through Attorney General Matt Denn’s Office

A pungent stench is coming from Delaware Attorney General Matt Denn’s office when it comes to the Freedom of Information Act.  When the Delaware Attorney General’s office gets the facts wrong on a response to a FOIA complaint, the only way for a Delaware citizen to correct those errors is to file with the Superior Court.  Which costs money and fills the state coffers.  Can someone please remind me why I pay taxes for a state where our Governor feels “sunshine is the best disinfectant“?

The response I received two days ago from Matt Denn’s office stems from my FOIA complaint and the Delaware Dept. of Justice’s response to that FOIA which came out on October 28th.  The Delaware Pathways Steering Committee did not publish their first meeting anywhere and I filed a complaint.  Considering the DOJ is still working on a FOIA complaint I submitted last March, it seems there was a rush to put the matter concerning Governor Markell’s Executive Ordered Delaware Pathways Steering Committee to bed.

When I emailed Denn’s office to reevaluate the FOIA response the same day, I didn’t hear back from anyone.  On Tuesday I sent an email to Matt Denn asking for any type of response to my October 28th request.  On Wednesday, I received the below email from Kim Siegel, Denn’s FOIA Coordinator.  I did edit out part of the email which covered a separate matter I am working on with Denn’s office.

From: OpenGovernment (DOJ) <OpenGovernment@state.de.us>
To: Kevin Ohlandt <kevino3670@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 4:04 PM
Subject: October 28, 2016 determination

Dear Mr. Ohlandt, 

Attorney General Denn has asked me to respond to the issues raised in your December 6, 2016 e-mail.  Your e-mail makes reference to an October 28, 2016 determination by the Chief Deputy Attorney General in response to a FOIA petition regarding the Pathways to Prosperity Steering Committee.  Under the Delaware Code, a petitioner who is dissatisfied with the outcome of a FOIA determination by the Chief Deputy Attorney General may “appeal the matter on the record to Superior Court.”  Therefore, if you wish to appeal the determination, that is the mechanism under Delaware law by which to do so.  

Sincerely,

Kim Siegel, MPA
Legislative Affairs Manager

FOIA Coordinator
Delaware Department of Justice

So if I am understanding this correctly, when a citizen alleges a public body has violated FOIA, which is the law, the public body can skirt around the law and give false information.  But when the citizen calls them out on it, through a request for appeal, suddenly the DOJ decides the law is important.  The mechanism for appeal is not fair at all to a citizen looking for transparency.

What is the point of a Freedom of Information Act request if the agency looking at it refuses to look at all the facts from both sides?  This is typically how it is done- a party files a complaint with the facts as they know them, the DOJ sends the complaint to the party that had the FOIA complaint filed against them, the defending party sends a response, the DOJ sends the defendant agency’s response to the accuser, and then the DOJ rules on the complaint.  I have had FOIA complaints in the past that dragged out because the DOJ wanted more information.  Apparently, that was not the case with this complaint.  The DOJ Chief Deputy Attorney General came out with this FOIA response in record time without any chance of obtaining more information on the matter.

So if I want to take this matter further, I have to file with the Superior Court.  How much would that cost?  According to the Superior Court website, it wouldn’t be cheap!

• $10.00 Court Security Assessment Fee
• $190.00 for the first 40 filings of an action
• $150.00 for request for a trial date which is non-refundable
• Fees do not include advertising costs which shall be billed directly to the filing party.

So right off the bat, filing an appeal against a FOIA response from Matt Denn’s office would cost me $350.00 which I would not get back no matter how the Superior Court ruled.  I could do this without an attorney and most likely get chewed alive by the DOJ’s attorney.  So I would probably have to get my attorney.  That would cost well over $1,000.00.  And that number would climb once it went to trial.

The transparency racket in Delaware is almost criminal.  In essence, it is a money-maker for the state in many situations.  I don’t have that kind of money.  Most Delawareans don’t.  Which is exactly what they count on.  When you file a FOIA complaint against a state agency asking for emails, the state agency knows they can say they don’t have the emails.  At that point, the state agency responds they don’t have them but the requesting party can file a $250.00 fee with the Department of Technology and Information to do a search for those emails.  Most people don’t have $250.00 they can just fork over like that.  And then the fees associated with reviewing the information.  Depending on what the party is looking for, this can climb into the four figure amount quickly.

Here is the bottom line: people don’t file FOIA requests if they think everything is hunky-dory.  They believe something illegal happened or is about to happen.  While FOIA responses from the DOJ don’t always rule there was a FOIA violation in a complaint, at times their reasoning is subjective.  The DOJ is not going to sue another state agency.  So if a citizen wants to take that extra step, they have to pay.  Even if the DOJ’s office gets information wrong, they appear to be above the law unless you take them to court.

It is the Department of Justice, not the Department of Covering Other State Agencies Asses.  But transparency is a fickle beast depending on who you want it from.  I guess us taxpaying citizens are not meant to know the truth about matters in Delaware.  It is bad enough Governor Markell can evade transparency by including a member of the General Assembly on an email (no member of the General Assembly is subject to FOIA), but it appears FOIA in and of itself is not freedom of information.  It should be called DOIA, the Denial of Information Act.

Last year, Delaware State Rep. Sean Lynn sponsored legislation which would have lifted the FOIA ban on the General Assembly.  It went nowhere.  Far too many of our legislators hide behind that privilege and are able to operate with no transparency.  And our state leaders take full advantage of this when possible.  The way Delaware code is set up it makes it impossible for a citizen to find out matters in the public interest.  When a citizen files a FOIA complaint with the DOJ, that office makes it impossible for a citizen to appeal that decision unless they pay money to the state.  Even if that citizen produces contradictory information which could easily give the matter further merit.

Until our legislators stop playing games with the truth, nothing will change with FOIA in Delaware.  We are just the pawns too many of them suck up to when they need our vote.  Once again, I say this with the caveat that there are some legislators who are good people.  But it rests with the leadership of the House and Senate as well as the committee Chairs.  If you have nothing to hide, there shouldn’t be a problem with making FOIA easier.  But it is more clear that fraud and cover-up exists at the highest levels of Delaware.  And when an education-sucking vampire like the Rodel Foundation gets thrown into the mix, all bets are off.

This is the email I sent to Delaware Attorney General Matt Denn when I submitted a request for appeal on the FOIA response from October 28th:

From: Kevin Ohlandt <kevino3670@yahoo.com>
To: Denn Matthew (DOJ) <matthew.denn@state.de.us>
Cc: Siegel Kim (DOJ) <kim.siegel@state.de.us>; Gibbs Danielle (DOJ) <danielle.gibbs@state.de.us>; OpenGovernment <opengovernment@state.de.us>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 4:47 PM
Subject: This FOIA Complaint legal opinion issued today is just wrong.

Delaware Attorney General Matt Denn,

Good afternoon,

I am openly and publicly asking you to respond to this opinion issued from your office today acknowledging ALL the facts I presented in this article as well as the questions posed at the end of the article:

https://exceptionaldelaware.wordpress.com/2016/10/28/attorney-general-opinion-on-delaware-pathways-steering-committee-issued-today-is-sloppy-inconsistent-incorrect/

Thank you,

Kevin Ohlandt

Delaware School Safety Report Shows Severe Limitations In Our Schools For Controlling Violence

If we are to have a chance to reduce and reverse this type of behavior, it is necessary to begin early and to start in the home. Efforts must be made to reach out students and to provide them with positive new directions in elementary school. Several committee members pointed out that “middle school is too late.”

“If joining a gang is the only way to survive, the kids will join gangs,” one committee member said, adding, “A lot of teachers don’t know who gang members are. You, as a teacher, should know how to interact with kids and parents because kids and parents may not have the ability to interact with us.”

The committee discussed the possibility of cell phone bans in schools, but public schools in Delaware have not done so because parents want to be able to reach their children by phone.

These were just a few of the topics discussed in the Special Committee on Public Safety.

School safety.  Two words that mean so many things to so many people.  To some, it means making sure every single student and staff member is protected from violence.  To some it means reporting requirements.  Many think of Sandy Hook or Columbine.  Others think of a mounting problem that can never be corrected.

Earlier this year, in the wake of two very violent deaths in Wilmington, a group was formed by Senator Robert Marshall.  Marshall is the Chair of the Senate Public Safety Committee.  He formed a group that met twice to discuss school safety issues with various topics introduced.  Out of these meetings, Senate Concurrent Resolution #83 formed a Special Committee on School Safety.  The final report was given to the President Pro Tempore of the Delaware Senate and Governor Markell yesterday.

The below report has a great deal of information.  It is very long but it is worth the read.  Take the time to read it.  Every single word.  Whether you are for or against School Resource Officers or Constables in Delaware schools, it is important to know what is happening out there.  It affects every single citizen of this state.  Issues in schools can explode outside of schools often, but issues outside of schools are brought into schools all the time.

The one thing I took out of this report is there are no easy answers.  Issues around funding and legality are some of the biggest obstacles to making schools safer.  Trauma plays a huge role in our high-needs schools.  Family issues outside of school are one of the biggest obstacles to safe schools.

There was one recommendation coming out of the final report that I didn’t see discussed anywhere in the meeting minutes.

Provide funding for the Delaware Department of Education to conduct a voluntary, statewide survey among students, parents, and teachers to get their thoughts on improving the learning environment and ways to make our schools safer.

It can’t be a report on education in Delaware without the Delaware Dept. of Education inserting something they want, which usually involves them getting more money.  One important thing to take note of in this report is that Delaware Senator David Sokola and State Rep. Earl Jaques were both listed as members of this committee but neither went to any of the meetings on it or bothered to assign a designee to attend in their absence.

The parts about Senate Bill 207, which I also issued severe problems with, were echoed by many in regards to future under-reporting of incidents in schools.  I thank God the House added an amendment to the bill that still requires mandatory reporting to the Delaware DOE.  But there is one line about Senate Bill 207 in the final report which will give any Delaware citizen severe anxiety.

View this document on Scribd