I know I’ve been picking on the News Journal a lot lately, but they deserve it. After their constant defamatory attacks on Kathleen Davies with fabricated reports, I have to ask a legitimate question: How much are they getting paid to go after Davies? It is beyond the point of absurdity. What did they do now? Continue reading
Last week, News Journal reporter Jessica Bies came out with an article about a confidential report that the News Journal “obtained”. The article was rife with speculation and hearsay based on a report commissioned by State Auditor Tom Wagner concerning Kathleen Davies. That article appeared in print today. It looks like something you would see in a bargain-basement tabloid at a grocery store. Continue reading
Matt Albright with the Delaware News Journal just wrote an article on Delaware Military Academy looking to expand. During their charter renewal process, Delaware Military Academy (DMA) asked for a modification to increase their enrollment from 566 cadets to 715 over the next five years. To do so, they would need additional facilities to hold the students. They need capital funding to do this. Delaware charter law explicitly states charters in the state do not receive capital funding. Another Delaware charter, Odyssey, was highlighted in the News Journal a couple weeks ago for wanting this as well. Albright wrote:
The school has a plan for how to expand, but it does not know yet how it will pay for it. This is a common concern for charter schools because they do not get capital funding from state government like traditional schools do. That means charters must stretch their budgets if they want to build new facilities or make major renovations.
That is the way the law was written Matt! Come on, you know this. So why are you pandering to the charters? I don’t see you asking citizens to vote yes in traditional school district school referendums. This is just a big advertisement for the legislators. This is how the charter community works. They get the News Journal to write stories about what they are sorely lacking, right before the legislative session begins, in the hopes it will become an “issue”. If I were the Red Clay board, I wouldn’t approve this modification if the school does not have the ability to hold the additional students and doesn’t have the funding available. This is very poor planning on DMA’s part. Crying poor after they submit a modification but before it is even approved shows poor judgment.
A recent bill which passed in the Florida House of Representatives would allow charters in the state to get 40% of the district’s funding for capital costs. The capital funding part was just a part of a larger bill, but the bill had no controversy until the capital funding section was added. Other highlights of the bill include:
The proposal would create the Florida Institute for Charter School Innovation to help new charter schools. It would also make it easier for top-performing charter schools to replicate themselves in high-need areas and specify that charter schools receiving back-to-back Fs would be automatically closed.
This is something Commandant Anthony Pullella, the leader of DMA, is already pushing for.
Pullella isn’t calling for the state to instantly start giving charters as much capital money as it does traditional school districts. But he does believe schools should be able to earn some assistance if they prove they are effective.
He proposes, for example, a graduated system in which a charter could earn 25 percent of a traditional school’s capital funding after five years of proven success. It could progressively earn more the longer it continues to show it is successful.
I could easily see some of the legislators in Delaware trying something similar to what the Florida House just passed. In addition, other parts of the Florida charter bill are taking shape in Delaware. We are seeing this with the Statewide Review of Educational Opportunities. As well, the Wilmington Education Advisory Committee recommended an organization to oversee all the Wilmington charter schools.
Charter schools were required to be models of innovation that local districts could emulate. But the problem with the perceived success Pullella talks about is the fact that this is based on standardized test scores. This is the barometer of all public schools success in Delaware. There is also the question about the school population and how charters select their applicants. Any school can be a success if the application process is flawed and only the best and the brightest are allowed in. This is something quite a few charter schools in Delaware have issues with. Including the biggest: Charter School of Wilmington, another Red Clay authorized charter.
But the big kicker is this: what happens if the school closes? Since charters are considered corporations and they are not state-owned, the property would revert back to that corporation. Any funding a state kicked in would be lost forever. Something Delaware State Rep. Kim Williams brought up in the News Journal article as well:
“What if the school closes? Does the state get the building? It’s kind of a gray area,” she said. “DMA is very popular with parents. But they knew coming into this that that kind of funding was not available to them.”
Chances are we will see that exact situation play out in exactly one week when the State Board of Education will most likely revoke Delaware Met’s charter and have them close after this marking period ends. While the school received no capital funding, they did receive $175,000 as part of the Delaware Charter School Performance Fund. Money from this fund can go to capital costs with very little oversight. We are now seeing, after twenty years of charters siphoning off more and more local school district dollars, Delaware charters wanting to change the playing field even more in their favor. Even though they get tons of money from the Longwood Foundation, they still want more. Based on an illusion of success called standardized test scores. And as usual, they find a public spotlight in the form of the News Journal.
When folks say I am anti-charter, I’m not. I’m all about following the rules. If it isn’t Family Foundations Academy squandering over a million dollars, or Delaware Met’s self-nuking a month after they opened, its stuff like this that drives me crazy about charters. They brag about how great they are and act like they don’t have any money. But DMA apparently had extra money to spend when they went through their own investigation with the Delaware State Auditor’s office a few years ago. And lets not even get into special education at a lot of these charters. They know exactly what I’m talking about, right guys?
I fully expect to see someone, possibly a Republican State Rep. or Senator, to introduce some crazy legislation like this in Delaware during the second part of the 148th General Assembly. The big difference between Florida and Delaware is that the Republicans don’t hold the majority in the First State. My recommendation to Delaware charters: stop whining about what you don’t have and looking for short cuts. You know where to go to get that kind of money, so give the DuPonts a call. Or one of the numerous charter-loving “foundations” or “non-profits” out there. But stop asking an already cash-strapped state for more money. And stop expecting to get more from the local districts. Because at the rate you are “expanding” and “growing”, you are getting more of the local share of school district money than you ever were. But what happens when those districts reach the breaking point, and they are no longer able to pass referendums? Look at Christina as a model of this. Cause if you don’t, you will end up shooting yourselves in the foot.
The one thing charters in Delaware do much better than traditional school districts is parent engagement. I don’t think anyone will contest that. But please, stop brainwashing these parents into reaching out to the media to get your way. The bizarre cult-like fascination with some Delaware parents and charters is bad enough as it is.
As for the News Journal: please stop with your charter loving articles. Yes, you write about the bad too. But you try to bring issues up not because they are truly newsworthy, but because you are getting calls from the charter lobbyists who also happen to be aligned with your biggest advertisers. It’s called bias, and it is well-known throughout the state.
I have to crack up when I read the News Journal these days. In an article about school funding, Matthew Albright with the News Journal started talking about how city kids did on the Smarter Balanced Assessment. But he doesn’t call it by name. This is what he says:
On the state’s tough new standardized test…
Call it by name Matthew Albright! It’s called the Smarter Balanced Assessment! Did Markell call you guys and tell you to call it that cause he doesn’t want people Googling “Smarter Balanced Assessment”? Too bad Jack! They can come here to read the actual words. Own it News Journal! Own it Jack! Especially since Jack said it was “the best test Delaware ever made” last summer at New America. I also see the words Common Core starting to fade in favor of “the state standards”. Stop pussy-footing around and take ownership of the monster you created Jack!
Hey Jack, why no comment on the Delaware Met? You certainly had a lot to say about the priority schools, but we have a school where a student had their hair put on fire and you go strangely mum. Would that be because you don’t want people to see this as YOUR failure? Along with the Smarter Balanced Assessment?
Hey Jack, how is it going? Seriously. We never talk. What are your plans after you leave your Governor job? Inquiring minds want to know. I know you’ve been busy. You know, working the rounds so to speak. Making calls. I get it. You have your plans, and you will do anything to get them completed. I get that. Don’t agree with whatever you are planning I’m sure, but I understand.
By the way Jack, opt-out season is fast approaching so I may jump ahead on it this year. I look forward to the new crazy ideas you come up with in 2016 to try to stop opt-out. They will fail, and I will laugh, but I admire your attempts. It reminds me of a phrase from “It’s A Wonderful Life”. “Every time a bell rings, an angel gets it wings”. Or something like that. You can equate that with the opt-out movement any way you like. Are your opt-out guard dogs ready? They have a big season ahead and they will need to be at the top of their game.
I emailed you the Santa Claus opt-out proclamation, but I didn’t see a response. Maybe you sent one to Santa. Good luck trying to turn that guy over to your side! He sees greed 22,000 miles away! I don’t think Santa is going to opt out of liking opt-out Jack.
I posted some old videos you put up from your 2008 campaign for Governor. Love how you talked about the horrible Delaware student test and how bad it was and teachers need to teach and not to the test. You have come a long way since then Jack. I’m not sure how this went from the News Journal to you Jack, but what the heck! It’s a Saturday night (at the time of this writing), I’m tired, and I like free-writing sometimes. No research, just letting it flow. Alright, if I’m talking about writing, it’s time to bid adieu.
The Delaware News Journal’s Jon Offredo wrote an article about the United States House of Representatives passage of the “Every Student Succeeds Act” and how in a rare moment of consensus, most stakeholders in education agree on the legislation. Citing the Delaware State Education Association (DSEA), the Delaware PTA, New Castle County Vo-Tech Superintendent Dr. Vicki Gehrt, and Governor Markell in the article is not a completely accurate picture of consensus. Many in Delaware feel the bill, while giving states more authority in education, opens the door to all sorts of new problems. But the News Journal didn’t reach out to anyone else who could have offered a negative opinion of this bill.
States, districts and parents decried a one-size fits all education policy and many of the goals, including one that mandated every student to reach a proficiency on tests by 2015, were not met.
Since then, Congress has been unable to come up with a better education law so the Obama Administration has issued waivers to states exempting them from the requirement. The waivers mean states won’t lose federal money.
It is those very waivers that have allowed the Delaware DOE and Governor Markell to steer Delaware education towards a disastrous path since Markell took reign in January of 2009. It is my contention Congress refused to act on reauthorizing this bill due to immense pressure from corporate education reform lobbyists who got exactly what they wanted with the ESEA Flexibility Waivers and with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
Perhaps the biggest cheerleader for ESSA is Governor Markell, because he got to keep his precious standardized testing…
“The Every Student Succeeds Act preserves some of the most important elements of our existing system, including annual testing requirements in 3rd-8th grade and in high school, which ensure that every student counts,” the statement said. “We would have liked to see stronger requirements for timely intervention in schools where students are struggling, but overall, the Every Student Succeeds Act is an important step forward that will give states more flexibility to meet their students’ needs.”
What I worry about this is states like Delaware who lead the corporate education reform movement. Every move Markell made in the past ten plus years has been towards the goals of companies who thrive on “fixing” education. In giving states more authority in education, states who already abuse that power are ripe to continue DSEA, along with their national counterpart, the NEA, has trumpeted the ESSA as a great bill because it does not have as big an impact on teachers in terms of evaluations.
Many people are very concerned about the huge pot of money available for new charter schools which will result in a sort of “Race To The Top” for new charter schools. Others are concerned about the consequences “community schools” and services can have on parental decisions and rights. Technology and personalized learning are touched on in this bill but in a way that gives the controversial practice a wide berth in the future. Standardized testing is still here, and Common Core is so embedded in education now that it would be very difficult to just do away with it as the bill allows.
The only parent voice in this article belonged to Dr. Terri Hodges with the Delaware PTA who wisely stated she is “cautiously optimistic” about the ESSA. The News Journal rarely goes out to ask everyday parents who don’t belong to some organization about their thoughts on education matters. Not one Delaware legislator commented on this article. But if it is something Rodel or Vision Coalition related, the News Journal goes out of their way to write huge articles and allow multiple letters to the editor on what those groups promote. Many understand this is because those groups and those of the Delaware Business Roundtable provide a lot of advertising dollars for the News Journal. As a result, many folks in Delaware have lost respect for the newspaper based on this and other biases.
The Superintendents of the Wilmington schools, Red Clay, Christina, Colonial and Brandywine, held an education forum for WDEL last night. Discussing the issues of Wilmington education, the subject of the state assessment came up. What was very interesting was Brandywine Superintendent Dr. Mark Holodick’s response to this issue. He told WDEL’s Shana O’Malley:
Brandywine superintendent Dr. Mark Holodick added that they’re starting to see pushback from those who are frustrated and unhappy with state standardized testing.
“The length of the state assessment, how often it’s being given, combined with this era of high stakes accountability for both educators and school ratings and rankings, I think it has reached a tipping point,” he said.
I gave Holodick a lot of heat earlier in the year for his views on opt-out procedures. He seemed to think only he could decide who takes the test and who doesn’t. Opt-out isn’t about someone giving permission. It’s about honoring a parent’s right and not giving any grief about it. Even Acting Christina Superintendent Bob Andrzejewski jumped on the issue.
“For example, the state test that we give, I think cost us about $6 million,” said Dr. Robert Andrzejewski, acting superintendent for the Christina School District. “What if we decided to go back to a system where we test grades three, five, eight and ten like we used to and maybe cut the testing cost in half. There are other priorities like that.”
Or how about we just get rid of the Smarter Balanced and high-stakes testing environment altogether Bob A? That would solve that problem!
Even the News Journal Editorial staff jumped on this issue this morning.
If that’s the case, why can’t Delaware take a proactive stance and focus not on a child’s scores, but on the child herself? If the state is so concerned with schools trying to game the system, then the system is broken and our energy should be spent on fixing it, not simply policing it.
The devil is in the details with that one. If it means personalized learning where one students gets ahead faster and another stays behind, no thanks! And how much will it cost to fix it? We all know fixing anything in education in Delaware means the DOE sends tons of money to outside companies to “fix” what they don’t understand. And if it’s all tied to the Delaware School Success Framework, the DOE’s latest and not greatest accountability nightmare, it still doesn’t matter. We will see what kind of people the Delaware State Board of Education really are when they vote on Regulation 103 which makes this insane school report card legal. Even the News Journal seems to agree on that one:
Though Gov. Jack Markell vetoed opt-out legislation this summer, it’s safe to assume Smarter Balance will not see 100 percent student participation this school year. And if the General Assembly overrides Markell’s veto when it returns to session, then the entire scorecard concept is out the window.
House Bill 50 is all about parental rights in terms of how they want their child to be educated. It is nothing more than that. Something the News Journal is finally coming around to by giving it their full support:
In the meantime, parents, more than anybody else, deserve to have a say in how their kids are educated. Let’s honor that right.
It would have really helped if they came out with that opinion eight months ago! Why the sudden shift in thinking on the Smarter Balanced Assessment? I think it is becoming more apparent than ever that Governor Markell is indeed a lame-duck at this point and everyone is sick to death of hearing about his education reform ideas. Everyone is starting to look towards the future and essentially undoing a lot of what Jack wrought on the First State. Folks are sick and tired of the accountability behemoth the DOE has become and they want it to stop. Their stupid score card penalties are not required, and I have not heard anyone say “Oh, that’s a great idea!” The DOE is a hot mess, and if they want to play the accountability game, that starts with them! In the meantime, keep opting your kid out of the Smarter Balanced Assessment and educate other parents of their rights!
Meanwhile, as all the adults keep tinkering around with education, it is the students who suffer the most. As Dr. Holodick told WDEL:
“I think we have an opportune time to ask some really hard questions about what we have created regarding the educational landscape in Delaware,” added Holodick.
We are ALWAYS asking the really hard questions Mark. The time to stop asking and start doing has to begin now before this generation of students loses it all to the high-stakes testing proficiency machine.
Matthew Albright with the Delaware News Journal finally jumped on the Delaware Met story three days after this blog broke the news about it’s pending closure. The article does not state the school is closing because the board is meeting tonight to decide if they should hand in their charter. I would fully expect a mainstream media source to take this route. However, I do take offense to this part:
Rumors circulated through the weekend that Delaware Met had already made the decision to close. Students did not attend school Friday – Harrington said the school scheduled professional development for teachers – but kids were back Monday.
“We’ve been trying to get the message out to parents that no decision has been made, but they keep hearing people saying it’s already happened,” Harrington said. “It isn’t helping.”
Why would Albright only contact the school about this? There was no mention of the Delaware Department of Education who I’m sure would have been notified. As well, he knew what the source of the “rumors” was and I never heard from him. But he was up in Philly for the Papal Visit. Mr. Harrington, you could have easily contacted me as well, but the school did not respond to my two emails on Friday. Nor did the Department of Education.
Is this school a special education school? Calling it a “Big Picture School” is not indicative of what has been going on there.
Second, the board will decide whether the school can get a handle on problems with school climate. Harrington said there have been fights and incidents in which students have been disrespectful towards school staff.
“We’re talking about kids acting out,” Harrington said. “Our board’s and leadership’s priority is making sure we can provide a safe environment for our students.”
Part of providing a safe environment for students is having a firm handle on student’s Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) prior to the start of school. Being that there was no board meeting in August, I would really have to wonder how prepared this school was for opening day. I do have a lot of respect for Ed Emmett from Positive Outcomes, and he could be a valuable source for helping the school understand special education issues. But I think their financial issues may be beyond just an enrollment issue. How much are they paying to Innovative Schools for rent? Since they have NO financial information on their website (which they are required to do monthly as per Delaware law), how could anyone ascertain what their financial picture is?
I also have to question the role Innovative Schools plays in Delaware education. Their name has been attached to far too many charters that close or have huge financial issues at some point. Is it time to reel them in for a serious investigation? And of course Kendall Massett with the Delaware Charter Schools Network is riding in for the rescue. But is it too late? Given everything I have written about this school in the past few days I would be very concerned as a parent of a teenager attending this school. Conflicts of Interest are as transparent as Saran Wrap and this school has red flags all over it.
I submitted an editorial letter to several Delaware media a week ago. Entitled “Opt Out Ends The Madness Of High-Stakes Testing”, it appeared in the Delaware State News, Delaware Liberal, and The News Journal. Delaware Liberal wrote everything I wrote, and Delaware State News wrote just about everything, except a part about the News Journal continuing to get House Bill 50 wrong. I can understand that, don’t bash the competition. No issue there.
When I sent the email to Delaware media, I asked if there was any way they could get it in prior to Thursday. I sent it on a Sunday though, so I didn’t know if that would be possible. I get that. It was in Delaware State News and Delaware Liberal on Thursday. I was a bit bummed the News Journal didn’t put it in at all, but I also knew Matt Albright would be at the Parent Strike press conference on Thursday. To my surprise, it did show up Friday on Delawareonline. I didn’t really read it, thinking it would show what I sent to them and what others had posted. It showed up in their actual newspaper yesterday.
So how did I find out they messed up? Of all places, the Rodel Foundation. Or more specific, their blog. I’ve actually found their “daily news” section of their blog to cover a lot of articles in one place. I never see my stuff in there, nor would I expect to. Lo and behold, I see my editorial covered in their “daily news” on Friday with the headline, and “opinion by Kevin Ohlandt, blogger” (come on Paul, you can’t put the words Exceptional Delaware, or parent, or even human being? Blogger?). My radar went way up. This is an editorial slamming the DOE and Smarter Balanced and really getting aggressive in wanting every parent in the state to opt their child out. Why would Rodel of all places be providing a link to it? Curiosity got the best of me, and I read what showed up in the News Journal.
I’m going to do a compare and contrast here…blue is the original parts in Delaware Liberal posted Thursday which had everything I mailed to Delaware media a week ago (with one exception and that was the part about also filing federal violations since I sent it to them Wednesday night, a few hours after I filed those), and red is the News Journal.
This “school report card” is nothing more than Federal mandate PLUS the many layers of complexity the DOE added to it.
This “school report card” is nothing more than Federal mandate.
See how they took out the whole part about the DOE adding to it and making it look like the whole school report card is “Federal mandate”? Very crafty…
This week, we will hear about the creation of 10 new so-called “Focus Schools” and 4 “Focus Plus Schools”. The DOE will attempt to sell this as yet another way of “fixing” these high-need schools. The truth is, these labels are punitive in nature and are just another step before they become “Priority Schools”. We all know how that went a year ago.
The DOE will attempt to sell this as yet another way of “fixing” these high-need schools. The truth is, these labels are punitive in nature and are just another step before they become “Priority Schools.”
By taking out the part about the DOE adding stuff, it makes it look like the Federal mandate will be sold by the DOE wanting to “fix” the high-needs schools. It’s an editorial, so of course it’s going to have opinion. And we do all know how it went a year ago, not very well!
The transparency around Regulation 103 and the “school report card” is suspect at best. I filed a large complaint with the Delaware Department of Justice over several issues, and a complaint over FOIA violations with the DOE. As well, for the second time this year, I filed a complaint over FOIA violations with the DOE. The first complaint showed the DOE overcharging me nearly $7,000. It seems the DOE wants accountability for everyone but themselves.
The transparency around Regulation 103 and the “school report card” is suspect at best. I filed a large complaint with the Delaware Department of Justice over several issues, and a complaint over FOIA violations with the DOE. The first complaint showed the DOE overcharging me nearly $7,000.
Keep in mind that Albright was at the Parent Strike press conference AND the State Board of Education meeting. He heard me list my complaints against the DOE and the State Board of Education twice. How much was written about a State agency getting five state complaints and two federal complaints? One of those being on OCR complaint? Not one word. In fact, Albright didn’t write at all about anything with Regulation 103, even though that was obviously the highlight of the whole board meeting. But in the above, we get what looks to be confusion with my complaints, like I’m not too sure what I’m doing. We obviously can’t be slamming the DOE too hard in News Journal letters. Especially when it comes to controversial issues on accountability for schools but the DOE never owns up to what they do, never!
This was the one that REALLY did it for me though…watch what they do…
The DOE would have us blame the teachers in these schools. How about we blame the DOE and Governor Markell? Instead of focusing on the true needs of students, such as smaller classrooms and more special education training, our schools continue the failed experiment of Smarter Balanced.
The DOE would have us blame the teachers in these schools. How about we blame the DOE and Gov. Markell instead of focusing on the true needs of students.
Trying to make me look like a bad guy, like I would rather focus on DOE and Markell than focus on what students really need. That’s pretty low. And I’m sure Dr. Paul Herdman was probably like “Holy crap, did you see what Ohlandt wrote in the News Journal. We have to get this out there!” But it is worlds away from what I actually wrote. Actually, it’s a universe away. Yes, I am critical of their articles and editorials. I won’t deny that. But I don’t CHANGE what they write. I don’t combine parts of sentences to make them look bad. I’m pretty certain at this point I won’t be writing any more letters to the News Journal. They have published some and given me some mentions over opt-out, and I appreciate that. But I can’t condone this. Either this was a really bad copy editor, or this was intentional. Knowing the articles the News Journal writes, their allegiance to Rodel and the Delaware Business Roundtable, and their continual ass-kissing with the DOE and Governor Markell, I can’t help but assume it’s the latter. I’m sure they were arrogant enough to think I would only send it to the almighty News Journal and no one else would know. But guess what chumps, you screwed up.
To read what I actually wrote, please go to Delaware State News and Delaware Liberal at the below links.
If you want to get unbiased, good education news, please check out your local newspaper, or check out Avi’s great stuff on Newsworks. I’m really sick of the dog and pony show the News Journal keeps putting on. This is a newspaper that will sell their soul to Rodel and Markell and all their corporate education reform buddies, but when everyday people try to get their point across they edit it and change intent. Maybe I should opt out of reading the News Journal altogether…
So I’m reading Nancy Willing’s excellent Delaware Way this evening, and I see a post where she is nominated for the News Journal Reader’s Choice award, under local blogger. I wrongly assumed this was a Wilmington thing, but much to my surprise, I saw Exceptional Delaware nominated under the blogs. So a big thank you to anyone who nominated this little blog for the awards. It is an honor beyond belief, and there is some great competition in there!
If you want to vote, please go to News Journal Reader’s Choice and it’s not just blogs, it’s pretty much everything!
The Delaware News Journal is an interesting newspaper. Read by about 300,000 citizens of Delaware, they are always quick to write an editorial about anything education related very soon after it happens. This week it was the announcement of who was on the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission and what the committees are.
This “Our View” opinion piece raised some interesting points, but it failed to mention the critical part about redistricting any Christina schools to Red Clay- funding. This is the biggest challenge facing this whole issue, and it seems like nobody really wants to talk about it at this point. I know, the group doesn’t even start meeting until next week. But if the funding questions aren’t answered very fast, this will never happen.
There is already serious talk about changing the way homes are assessed in Delaware. Most agree it is too low. But if you thought folks were screaming at everyone over two failed referendums in Christina, wait until any type of legislation is introduced to tackle that one! Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for it. My home is assessed at 1/3rd or less of it’s market value. Property assessments are always lower than the market value, but not that much! But there are many in the state who don’t want to pay one penny more for education. Some just don’t want to pay more, or they feel the districts and charters have too much wasteful spending, or they think the State of Delaware should cut a lot of their education reforms and give more to the districts. While that would certainly help, would it be enough for 133,000 public school students in the state?
The editorial does talk about “a sluggish economy that limits choices” and “revenue shortfalls“, but nothing about the very large elephant in the room over where the hell funding comes in for this. As we are seeing with the Red Clay priority schools, funding has already come up as a huge issue. What makes anyone think the state can handle something more immense?
But the editorial did mention the parent opt-out issue, but not as something parents wanted, but this:
“And in June, some legislators led a rebellion against the governor on mandatory state testing. Now they are threatening to override the Governor’s veto.”
First off, it wasn’t “some” legislators. It was almost 3/4 of them. This is where the News Journal editorial crowd always loses me. It makes the legislators look like a bunch of rowdy cowboys who only passed the bill to tick off Jack. It was more like this: they heard the voices of their constituents and acted. Just because it goes against the almighty Jack Markell doesn’t make it a rebellion. If anything, it signaled the first sign of Spring in Delaware education legislation after a very long Winter.