Indian River Goes On The Defense In Reaction To Anti-Referendum Ads

Indian River has a referendum coming on November 22nd.  Before that happens, the Delaware Auditor of Accounts office will issue an audit inspection report.  A citizen in the district paid for ads in the Sussex County Post with allegations against the district and how they are spending money.  In response, Indian River Superintendent Dr. Susan Bunting, Board President Charles Bireley and Board Vice-President Rodney Layfield submitted a letter to the editor at the Sussex County Post.

Many of the ads attacking the referendum and the response from the district center around the former Chief Financial Officer, Patrick Miller.  Miller resigned earlier this year without any public knowledge of the events which led to his resignation.  He was put on paid administrative leave the month prior.

As a result of the letter from the district, there is some clarity around the hiring of Miller in Indian River:

It should be noted that Mr. Miller was hired by the Indian River School District in September 1998, approximately six weeks before the state auditor’s office began its investigation of Brandywine’s finances. The final auditor’s report was not issued until September 2000 and Mr. Miller’s criminal case was not adjudicated until November 2000, more than two years after he was hired by IRSD.

As it turns out, the district is claiming they requested an audit, even though no prior audit report suggested a problem:

The public should know that the district requested the audit that is currently being conducted by the state auditor’s office. This request was made based upon information received in April by the administration and Board of Education. Therefore, any accusation of a “cover up” is unfounded, misleading and unfair.

One item in the letter puzzled me greatly.

The district is committed to being a good steward of our taxpayers’ dollars. This is evident in the property tax reductions implemented by our Board of Education during the past three years.

If the district knew they had all these future costs coming and a student population growing by leaps and bounds, why would they lower property taxes?  Were these for things like tuition tax or because prior referenda increases ran out?  For example, the capital costs for a school building do not last forever.  Eventually those increases end.  If that is the case with Indian River, it doesn’t show the board just deciding to lower taxes but rather they are following what was naturally supposed to happen.

While I have posted what amounts to rumors (although told to me by many different people not associated with each other) regarding Miller, I will wait to see what the audit investigation reports.  I believe that when taxpayer dollars are at stake in the operation of a school district which has over 10,000 students in it, the privacy of one employee should not be given greater weight than everyone else involved in the district.  There needs to be some type of legislation allowing a school district or board of education to release information when something happens that triggers an investigation from the auditor’s office.  When there is very little transparency surrounding serious issues, especially during a referendum campaign, the public needs to know exactly what is going on.  If this were a charter school, they would be forced to reveal what is going on through a formal review process.  We need that type of mechanism for our local school districts as well.

Published by

Kevin Ohlandt

I am a proud parent of a son with Tourette's Syndrome and several other co-morbidities. I write on this blog to educate other parents so they know a bit more about not only special education, but all the really bad things that are happening with public schools in Delaware and the USA. We are all in this together, and if our children aren't able to advocate for themselves it's up to us parents! We need to stop letting companies run our schools, and demand our children get a proper education. Our Departments of Education in our states have become weak with fear from the bullying US DOE, and we need to take back our schools!

3 thoughts on “Indian River Goes On The Defense In Reaction To Anti-Referendum Ads”

    1. Regarding releasing information. This is not a policy of the Indian River School District but rather federal law that tells the IRSD what to do. The IRSD cannot release information until such time as it is properly vetted by the state. The same would actually apply to the Charter school.


  1. I have followed you for years in silence. At times, you appear to investigate a situation, and at other times, you report solely what you hear. Why?????? Very disappointing!!!!

    In reference to Chet Elder, did you ever bother to find out that he has attempted to hawk his mediocre at best books to several Maryland counties and Delaware districts. How many districts did not buy them, and how many counties and districts will receive the vitriol of Chet Elder? Is this retaliation, Mr. Elder, for your failed book sales or a way to shamelessly promote yourself? Tsk, Tsk, Tsk.

    Mr. Elder, how much did you spend on those purposely inaccurate ads-hundreds, thousands? You probably could have paid the small tax increase a referendum would result in for at least 8 years for what you spent on misinformation. You, sir, are either stupid or a con artist yourself.

    You have targeted and libeled Dr. Susan Bunting. You, sir, should know how a district works since you have been in education for so long. You know that the Board of Education is the ultimate decision maker in a district. Do you prefer to target a woman instead of having the guts to address the Board made of mostly men?

    Is your own ego greater than the needs of children or do you just care about teachers and students when you are paid to do so? How many guilty employees did you advocate for during your career? It is a shame that you only care for kids when it benefits you.

    Chet Elder earned a great living and a great retirement on the backs of tax payers as a union rep in Maryland and Delaware. He advocated for the worst of the worst. He retires here, what 15 or 20 years ago and then spends time writing books on his so-called “expertise”?. Some of us have to work well into our 60s and 70s and do not have the time or luxury to sit back and pontificate.

    Shame on you, Chet Elder, and shame on you, Kevin, for falling for this!!!!!!! I would have expected better.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.