Denise Stouffer joined the Charter School Office at the Delaware Dept. of Education last April. but as of the past couple of weeks she became the Director of the Charter School Office. She rose through the ranks to replace Jennifer Nagourney, who left the Delaware DOE on July 1st to join the New York City Dept. of Education. But she had been working with the Delaware DOE for two years before that as a contractor with a title of “Data Governance Contractor”. In 2010, she created a company called BHS Educational Services based out of Pennsylvania. BHS specializes in helping individuals to create charter schools and professional development training. Stouffer also helped out the DOE during their contract with Wireless Generation as a consultant that trained people on professional development and data driven instructional practices. All this information is based on Stouffer’s LinkedIn account. While her new title does not appear on that account, it was referenced in the Charter School Office presentation to the Delaware State Board of Education at their retreat earlier this week.
I have seen Denise Stouffer at meetings the past few weeks, whether at the State Board of Education or Every Student Succeeds Act meetings. I was wondering who she was… now I know! I had a decent relationship with Jennifer Nagourney and I hope the same can be said for Denise Stouffer. I’m a pain in the ass at times. But as I’ve always told folks at the DOE and written on here more times than I can count, if I’m barking up the wrong tree, let me know! In any event, congratulations Denise! You have big shoes to fill!
Kevin Dombrowski wants the Charter School of Wilmington model to expand around New Castle County according to an article by the Delaware Business Times yesterday. Dombrowski works in Wilmington as the Senior Vice President of Global Business Development for Morningstar Inc. The article was about his selection as an honoree of the DBT40, which are 40 emerging Delaware businesss leaders and innovators. Dombrowski has also been heavily involved with the KIPP charter school chain. He currently serves on the Leadership Council for KIPP Philadelphia Schools and was a board member at KIPP Chicago for three years from 2009-2011 according to his LinkedIn account.
I would work to remove the barriers in place to practical educational reform in Delaware. Specifically, I would remove restrictions on new charter school developments and build out a plan to launch several new versions of the Charter School of Wilmington throughout New Castle County to meet the excess student demand and to provide more exceptional public school options for families in the area.
Now I’m not sure how much Mr. Dombrowski follows education in Delaware. I’m not sure if he is aware CSW has long been mentioned as a very controversial school based on their selective enrollment preferences. I don’t know if he knows even the Delaware Dept. of Education will not consider CSW as a reward school based on those preferences (something that seems to have escaped their notice with Newark Charter School, but I digress). I don’t think New Castle County could survive replication of Charter School of Wilmington as a chain of sorts. Unless, of course, they did away with those selective enrollment preferences that result in very low numbers of minorities (except Asians), students with disabilities, and low-income students. Then, and only then, would we be able to measure the true success of CSW. Mr. Dombrowski, were you aware that CSW was one of the named schools in the American Civil Liberties Union complaint filed with the U.S. Office of Civil Rights?
The United States Supreme Court will decide the fate of millions of special education students in America when they rule on a controversial case regarding what the appropriate amount of FAPE (Free Appropriate Public Education) is for students with disabilities. The landmark case, Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District, could have major consequences for special education students.
According to Disability Scoop:
The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the matter comes at the urging of the Obama administration. In a brief issued last month, the U.S. solicitor general agreed with the parents that the IDEA requires schools to provide more than minimal benefit to students with disabilities.
“This court should hold that states must provide children with disabilities educational benefits that are meaningful in light of the child’s potential and the IDEA’s stated purposes. Merely aiming for non-trivial progress is not sufficient,” the solicitor general indicated.
This could be a moment of triumph or severe disappointment. With the rise of Common Core and a transition from teacher-led instruction to constant bombardment of education technology and a competency-based education environment, students with disabilities have suffered the most from the constant education reform that has taken place over the past twenty plus years. As their numbers rise, so do the corporate profits. They have been forced to take a litany of state assessments that have the same results, year after year: these students tend to perform the worst on these tests. The amount of parents choosing to go the home school route for their special needs children has risen dramatically in the last decade.
A free appropriate public education, in its current landscape, comes with a very steep price for students with disabilities. Unless the Supreme Court clearly defines what FAPE should be, in the face of the overwhelming corporate-driven changes in our schools, these children will continue to be lost in public education. Personalized learning, in the modern-day era meaning, would gear all students towards their own individual education plans which strips the special out of special education. This flies in the face of what disability advocates fight for every single day.
Their reach is everywhere. Foundations who say they represent the best interests of children. Who want to fix education so all children can get a shot. Why then, do so many of the children of these philanthropists, politicians, and corporate education reformers, attend private schools? Ones without the invasive education technology and Common Core standards? That alone should tell everyone they are not in it for the kids. For them, it is about the profit. Servant and master. They feel we should bow down to their infinite wisdom and do as they say. The reports from the Department of Labor showing increasing jobs don’t paint the same picture as the doom and gloom coming from the education “prophets”. They talk about gaps between disadvantaged students and their peers while putting forth policy that enforces those gaps, whether it is from standardized tests, “IEPs for All”, the false importance of education technology, or the perception that traditional school district teachers are horrible. They are the incubators of discrimination and segregation. But they fail to understand how their actions contribute to the outside factors our schools should not have to deal with, such as trauma and poverty. With all their vast wealth and power, they don’t spend their money helping to ease these issues. They believe that it is okay to track students into career pathways starting at the first moment they are able to take a test. They don’t care that very personal information goes out to 3rd parties that have no business seeing any information like this. They wrote the Every Student Succeeds Act. They are the ones pushing for more charter schools. They have the US Dept. of Education in their back pocket along with the politicians and groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council and the National Governors’ Association. They have many colleges and universities doing whatever they say. But they are wrong. What they are doing is the best for themselves, not the kids.
It’s hard to believe it has been almost 22 months since the Delaware American Civil Liberties Union and Delaware Community Legal Aid announced their complaint against the Delaware Department of Education and Red Clay Consolidated School District. That complaint is sitting in the Philadelphia Office of Civil Rights collecting dust. I read the complaint again this morning. There is a legislator whose name is mentioned a few times in this complaint as the author of legislation that contributed to segregation in Delaware… Senator David Sokola.
I’ve noticed in the past week that the upcoming General Election in Delaware has many wondering if Sokola’s accomplishments outside of education should give him a second chance. I’ve argued that no matter what Meredith Chapman’s stances on education are, they pale in comparison to what Sokola has wrought. To be honest, aside from a video interview with Delaware United and a citizen commenting on a Facebook thread that Chapman supports a parent’s right to opt out of the state assessment, I have not heard enough from her to get a good picture of her views on education.
Knowing what occurred in Delaware because of certain charter schools and their enrollment practices, I thought this would be a slam-dunk in the Office of Civil Rights. But that office, an offshoot of the U.S. Department of Education, has been strangely silent. I am aware these complaints take years to reach a ruling. But the complaint itself says enough about Senator Sokola that any citizen reading it should be able to have a clear picture in their mind. The complaint also talks about the ignored warnings and omens from many that came with Sokola’s legislation which led to de facto segregation in parts of Delaware. I have never heard Sokola apologize for this. I’ve never seen any indication that he understands any of this.
David Sokola is a very intelligent man. He is someone who sees data and facts. His favorite word is “heartburn” when talking about legislation he doesn’t like. I’ve heard from many about his support for non-education bills that were very progressive in nature. But as I’ve always said, if you support legislation that will ultimately harm children, that is not very progressive. Like the citizens of Delaware who offered warnings before harmful Sokola legislation passed in the Delaware General Assembly, I offer a warning to Delaware. If the citizens of the 8th Senate District vote Sokola back into another term, Delaware children will suffer. Numbers don’t lie, and even if those charter schools changed their enrollment preferences to get rid of pre-enrollment assessments, 5 mile radius, sibling preferences, employee preferences, or the many other little things that contributed to the eventual outcomes we now see, it will be years before the situation balances between those three charter schools and the districts around them.
The complaint against the Delaware DOE and Red Clay is below.
Last night, I watched a movie released last summer called “Me Before You”. The movie dealt with the basic eventualities facing human beings: life and death. Without giving away the outcome of the movie, here is the basic premise of the movie based on the book by Jojo Moyes:
Will Traynor is struck by a motorcycle and becomes paralyzed from the neck down. Traynor is deeply depressed and in a great deal of physical pain and anguish afterwards. He was a very adventurous and daring man before this. Having gone through many caretakers who were not able to deal with the troubled man, his parents hire Lou Clark, a woman from a low-income London family who does not subscribe to the status quo and is her own woman. She doesn’t care how others view her at all.
After months of Traynor doing the same things he did with his other caretakers, eventually Clark is able to get Traynor to come out of his depression and smile. The two form a deep bond. Clark soon discovers her boyfriend is unable to deal with her passion for helping Traynor. Meanwhile, Clark discovers Traynor told his parents he wants to end his life at a Swiss clinic in six months as he no longer has the will to live with his condition. Clark makes it her mission in life to get Traynor to change his mind.
This is a story about love and sacrifice in its purest form. Both characters changed because of their interaction with each other. By the end of the story, they are not the same people. Traynor begins to experience life again through Clark’s eyes. Clark wrestles with what is best for Traynor: what she wants or what he wants.
This is a movie about a person with a disability. Many disability advocates spoke out against the movie. They felt what Traynor wanted to do was a cop-out and could give the wrong message to those afflicted with paralysis. Is it considered “death with dignity” if that death is not imminent? The movie talks a great deal about Traynor’s suffering and screams in the night, but does not show those moments of suffering. It does show incidents where Traynor suffers from high fevers and a hospitalization. The viewer is left with the impression Traynor suffers immensely from his disability. Choosing the moment of our death is a question of faith and belief. Many feel that is not our decision but that of God. Others feel it is murder. I don’t have the answers to those questions. But it got me thinking, about life and death. Do we embrace today or do the events of life determine who we are?
*Photo by Courtesy of Warner Bros. Picture – © 2016 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and Metro-Goldwin-Mayer Pictures Inc.