The Delaware Department of Education has tweaked the Delaware School Success Framework for the past four months without any public notice whatsoever unless you happen to look at the document buried on their website. While some of the changes were based on approved changes by the State Board of Education or the Secretary of Education (such as the change for 11th graders from Smarter Balanced to the SAT), others have not. Including a whole new metric calculation included in the latest version, released on Monday. To rephrase this, they added a whole new section! Now, if memory serves, the State Board of Education had to approve the Delaware School Success Framework. And under that statement, I would assume the State Board of Education would have to approve any changes to the accountability system. But here we have the Delaware DOE bypassing that process, with NO public notice, input, or comment.
Tell me, Secretary Godowsky, when does this better working relationship with the DOE start to happen? When does that transparency get better? Because I’m not seeing it. Maybe some district or charter leaders might be seeing this stuff, but they aren’t the only stakeholders in education. Please get that through your head. Because, from my vantage point, things are no better under your leadership than they were with Mark Murphy. Sure, some of the more visible lightning rods of controversy may have left, but that is no excuse to continue the absolutely horrible decisions your predecessor made. In fact, I would say it is making it worse. Who is guiding the DOE towards these decisions? Who is signing off on these changes? Why is there no discussion from Secretary Godowsky about these changes at State Board of Education meetings? Where is the documentation that led to the creation of whole new business rule and a new section of the Delaware School Success Framework? Was there another meeting of the Accountability Framework Working Group without any public notice whatsoever? Because they are the ones who convened for well over a year and were the “stakeholders” behind this thing originally. But I forget, you didn’t even follow their final recommendations with regards to the participation rate, so I assume their opinion doesn’t matter anyways.
The changes regarding the proficiency status if 30 students or less pass a “non-standard” state assessment are pretty major!
Proficiency in science or social studies should have no bearing on proficiency in English or Mathematics. Who does this benefit? When parents are looking for schools, they could be looking for how students do in English or Math. By changing the weight on non-related subjects it can skew the results for an entire school! Even if it winds up benefitting the school, it is a false picture provided on this “school report card”. I have to ask, who comes up with this nonsense? I can only come up with one scenario where this would directly benefit public impressions: charter schools. More under the radar puffing up of charters at traditional school district expense. When are you going to stop this? This n# thing that benefits charters in many situations has gotten out of control. I get that it is meant to dissuade identification of students, but 30? Come on! Who is going to identify one student out of a group of 30? In some Delaware charter schools, a grade could have less than 100 students. We know this. It allows charters to be exempt from some of the same accountability schemes traditional school districts are held under the knife for. It also happens in special education all the time when it comes time for compliance audits or federal state rating systems.
Delaware DOE: You are the Department of Education, not the Department of Delaware Charter Schools. Grow the hell up! It’s getting really old!
And here are the complete list of changes as provided at the end of the updated Delaware School Success Framework:
This needs to stop in Delaware. No school that receives public funds should receive ANY special treatment over others. But that is exactly what our DOE and State Board of Education do time and time again with our charter schools. They actually allow them to look good in any potential and possible situation. They do it with smoke and mirrors, behind closed doors, where no one can stop them. They don’t solicit public feedback or allow anyone to see these “business rules” until they incorporate them. And we are expected to believe they want public input on the Every Student Succeeds Act? I have no doubt they already know exactly what they are going to do there. Any pizza party at Grotto’s in Dover, on August 9th put on by the State Board of Education is just a big dog and pony show. And don’t believe the lie about “light refreshments” beginning at 5pm. When I went to one of these, they had whole pizzas. So come on down or up to Dover and make your opinions known! And eat lots of pizza!