Is There A Conflict Of Interest With A High-Ranking DE PTA Member Involving Christina School District?

Yvonne Johnson serves as the Vice-President of Advocacy for the Delaware PTA, sits on the board of the National PTA, and in news that most people don’t know is also employed with the Christina School District as the Parent Engagement Coordinator.  The issue with this surrounds transparency.  Nothing has ever been officially announced with Johnson’s hiring in this role.  There is no official name on the Delaware Division of Corporations for Yvonne Johnson as a business.  According to her National PTA profile, Johnson is a self-employed education consultant:

YvonneNationalPTAProfile

She has also been very involved in several current initiatives with the Christina School District, including their upcoming referendum and the Thurgood Marshall Elementary School.  The Christina referendum is on March 23rd.  As for the elementary school, Johnson is listed as the Christina Parent Engagement Coordinator in an announcement for a meeting at the school on March 1st:

MarshallInterestMtg

I looked on the Christina School District website, and it seems Christina already has someone else listed as their Family & Community Engagement Supervisor, Whitney Williams.  What is even more interesting is this idea for Thurgood Marshall in turning it into a Kindergarten to 8th grade school.  Quite simply, this is not in the district’s official plans for their upcoming referendum.  The current building for the school would not even be able to house a K-8 program.

As for Johnson’s role in this idea, is it proper for someone to be paid to have parents lobby the school board?  As the next three pictures show, taken from notes and a presentation on the “Marshall Plan”, Johnson has very specific ideas about this idea and the referendum.  Johnson also served as the head of the Referendum Committee for the Red Clay Consolidated School District last year.  Red Clay’s referendum was subject to a lawsuit that has not been decided on as of this date.

MarshallPlan1

We don’t see a Christina School District email address for Johnson, but that makes sense if she is self-employed and has some type of contract with the district.  However, no such contract exists on their website.

MarshallPlan2

This is where we see Yvonne Johnson actively soliciting parents to advocate for the “Marshall Plan” by essentially lobbying the Christina Board of Education.  But the next picture paints an even bigger picture:

MarshallPlan3

We see the line “Get out and vote for the referendum for planning $$”.  Should a paid consultant to the district be advocating for parents to “get out and vote” for increased money for the school district in which she is paid to consult for?  Is this plan even a part of the board-approved referendum?

The referendum does call for planning funds for potential grade reconfiguration in the amount of $100,000.00.  However, the “Marshall Plan” is looking at getting this going in the 2017-2018 school year.  That would require extensive capital costs to reconfigure an existing school that does not have the capacity.  If they shrunk the class sizes, the district does not have the ability to pay for that either.  The upcoming referendum is strictly for operating costs and not capital costs, which would be needed to move the school if necessary.  So my big question would be what in the name of Thurgood Marshall is going on with all of this?  While there is nothing in writing on the district website or in board documents indicating Johnson has a contract, several sources who wished to have their name withheld for this article have indicated Johnson has openly told them she is being paid for her services to the Christina School District.

In my opinion, Johnson’s capacity as serving on several different groups as well as her self-employed advocacy job, the Delaware PTA, the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission, several different Red Clay initiatives, and now her job with Christina, has far too many potential conflicts of interest for her to be issuing fair and impartial judgment on the Wilmington education scene.  As well, her position as a National PTA board member forbids her from advocating for opt-out of standardized testing but she is a consultant with a school district that had their board pass a policy honoring a parent’s right to opt out.

Don’t get me wrong here, I very much want Christina’s referendum to be successful.  I was not happy when their referenda did not pass last year.  But I also believe in full transparency, especially when a school district is asking for trust from their voters.  Trust is a two-way street.  Which means all aspects of school finances, contracts, and vendors need to be visibly apparent for all to see.

On a personal note, Yvonne Johnson is a great advocate.  There aren’t too many people in Delaware who have advocated for students as long as she has.  But the lines get blurry at times when people in Delaware jump on too many trains.  Yes, Delaware is a small state and if we had more parents taking on these kinds of roles, this wouldn’t be an issue.  But for those who do, they must recognize any potential conflicts of interest and act accordingly for the betterment of students.

7 thoughts on “Is There A Conflict Of Interest With A High-Ranking DE PTA Member Involving Christina School District?

  1. I don’t see any of this as a problem…

    “In my opinion, Johnson’s capacity as serving on several different groups as well as her self-employed advocacy job, the Delaware PTA, the Wilmington Education Improvement Commission, several different Red Clay initiatives, and now her job with Christina, has far too many potential conflicts of interest for her to be issuing fair and impartial judgment on the Wilmington education scene. ” –Kevin O.

    What are the conflict of interests? Pull back and look… in every one of those positions she is an advocate for students and parents.. Not RODEL… Not Wall Street…. Not Charters… Any of those would be a conflict. Your claim if followed through would make YOU, who blogs, who advocates in the House Education Committee, the Senate Education Committee, school boards up and down the state, who attends the WEIC, who meets and communicates with the DOE, a hypocrisy because in your words, there would be… “far too many potential conflicts of interest for (you) to be issuing fair and impartial judgment on the Wilmington education scene. No obviously this in your case is not true because you do all those things for one single interest: to represent exceptional children.. She likewise isn’t,… because in all cases, she is representing parents and students…

    The reason you are pulled in many directions is because you are an expert on this topic. The reason she is called upon to serve so many boards and initiatives, is also, because she is an expert on this topic as you stated yourself…

    “There aren’t too many people in Delaware who have advocated for students as long as she has. “== Kevin O.

    Personally I would prefer her on any board over Herdman… Get him off/ put her on.

    Secondly as to this: “As well, her position as a National PTA board member forbids her from advocating for opt-out of standardized testing but she is a consultant with a school district that had their board pass a policy honoring a parent’s right to opt out,” keep in mind that until 2 weeks ago, that was not a conflict of interest. She previously was one of the biggest advocates for parent’s opting out, as every education expert is. It’s the only thing that makes sense. It must be rough on her to sit on the national board because they apparently are insane. Not joking. No sane person can be against opting out… Ignorant people, people too lazy to investigate, and people who believe what higher ups tell them without questioning, are the only ones who at this late date, can still be against opting out… And the national board as we all learned, is completely ignorant. Our mutual friend Publius strongly supports the national board’s position, so if you need any indicator that the the national board is off their rocker, there you have it.

    You can’t blame a sane person for being appointed in good faith to a national board that has completely lost its mind…

    Are you sure your sources aren’t feeding you false outrage? Cause I don’t see it. Just so you know, it just looks like anti-referenda shenanigans to me… As in: feed Kevin a false story and completely hand-tie the previously successful referenda advocate in a brouhaha that disappears immediately after referendum is defeated, having served its purpose.

    Actually, from all you posted, I have no problem with what she’s doing at Marshall. As a parent, it certainly makes sense what she is advocating and I would wish her luck in accomplishing it. And if she wasn’t doing it, to be completely honest, there is no one else up there who could step up and carry it forward…

    You got my curiosity piqued, so keep us all updated… My recommendation is to cast a wider net and pull in some other sources to see if they support your other two. That may alert you whether or not you are being played.

    Like

    • I am a Christina parent and I am furious that our district is out for referendum for more money and we are paying Yvonne to do what? Help parents advocate for a K-8 school? Are you freakin’ kidding me? I’m sorry but this is a gigantic conflict of interest within out district and BTW she has been in bed with Rodel (Voices for Education), Gates (Common Core). Newark High lost its activity busses but we got Yvonne???? WTF! Yvonne can advocate all she wants just not on my dime!!! And also, how about getting a Christina parent….not a Wilmington Charter/Red Clay parent!

      Like

      • There is a non-sequitur in your statement. That is you being a Christina parent and furious your district is out for referendum.

        I’m sorry, I, nor anyone else can now take you seriously.

        Like

        • Sorry I mis typed. I am in support of the referendum but furious that they are paying Yvonne with the precious district funding we do have. That money should be in the classrooms not paying her to advocate. Not sure why I can’t be taken seriously. You think it’s not okay to question the district choices on their use of funding while they are asking for more. I think this is what responsible parents and citizens do.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.