Last night, the Delaware Met had their formal review public hearing at the Carvel Building up in Wilmington. About six students and four parents showed up. The school’s acting head of school, Teresa Gerchman with Innovative Schools, didn’t show up. Two students gave public comment about their teachers not giving instruction, and frequent “breaks” including smoking, ordering McDonalds, and leaving the school to go to the store. One parent asked the Delaware DOE to shut the school down, and two others want them to stay open. I think the students win this one, and I’m glad they had the bravery to speak up about their concerns with the school. I can’t wait to see this transcript!
This is why you need to opt your child out of the Smarter Balanced Assessment tomorrow on Wednesday, November 18th, 2015. And you need to send this message to every single parent you know who has a child in public school in the entire state. Use Facebook, Twitter, email, text and calling folks to let them know tomorrow is Opt-Out Day. Schools can not punish you or your child for your right to exercise your rights for what is best for your child.
The Delaware State Board of Education does not care about our schools and our students. These are unelected officials, along with the Secretary of Education, who serve at the pleasure of Governor Markell. Let’s get this out in the open for those who are not aware. They do not care about the path of destruction they leave in their wake with the excessive amount of standardized testing, interim testing for the standardized testing, labeling schools, and evaluating teachers based on those assessments. They do not care about the impact this has on children of poverty, race, and disabilities. They will do what they want, when they want, and how they want. They do not care if they are usurping the authority of the General Assembly. They do not care about the rights of parents and insist on having negative consequences for schools over opt-out, even if at the most the US DOE simply states in non-regulatory and non-Congressionally approved guidance that schools must have a “consequence” for opt-out. They do not care about the recommendations of the very committee they formed to give suggestions for this so-called “Delaware School Success Framework”. The only reason they even created this group is because it was required by the US DOE as stakeholder engagement. It is a charade and a sham, perpetrated on every single citizen of Delaware.
Delaware Parents: It is now your essential duty, as well as your fundamental right, to opt your child out of the Smarter Balanced Assessment. The powers that be will not listen. They have made this crystal clear. The only way to stop this is to opt your child out now. Do not believe the lies and propaganda coming from the Governor, the DOE, the State Board of Education, and the Secretary of Education in Delaware. They will come up with any reason, any task force, group or committee to try to stop you from opting your child out. They will use other state agencies, such as the Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens to get you to believe the lies. They will throw civil rights in your face while violating the most basic tenets of civil rights in their test and punish environment. They are causing even more segregation over the shaming of schools over standardized Their latest attempt at mind control is getting rid of the Smarter Balanced Assessment for high school juniors. They are retooling the SAT to match the very same Common Core State Standards the Smarter Balanced Assessment already has. Last Spring, it was announced more than 850 colleges and universities dropping the SAT in the application process. Warped methodology is their best friend, and they utilize it without regard to the damage it does.
So please, tomorrow, give a letter to your child’s principal telling them (not asking) that your child will not take the Smarter Balanced Assessment. If they have opinions, questions, or attempt to talk you out of it, let them kindly know you respect their opinion but your decision is final. They will definitely tell you now how it will affect their school’s ratings and so forth. Let them know you understand that but you are the only one who can advocate for your child. Advise them you expect your child to receive an education while the other students are testing, and stand firm with your decision. The Delaware General Assembly could override Governor Markell’s veto of the opt-out legislation, House Bill 50. The ESEA reauthorization will most likely leave it up to states to handle opt-out, which the DOE and Markell are attempting to do with Regulation 103, which would become law 60 days after the State Board votes on this. This is why, if you are going to opt your child out, you need to do it tomorrow. The State Board meets on Thursday to decide on this. Let’s show them how ignoring parents will not end well for them. They disrespect us and underestimate us. Let’s show them who is really calling the shots!
This is for all traditional school district and charter school parents. We need to stand united with this and take back the conversation. We need to show the DOE and the State Board we will not stand for them punishing schools. In a sense, just making your child take the Smarter Balanced Assessment is a punishment in and of itself. Because it does not help your child and the DOE uses it as a punishment. That is the message they told every single parent in the state today. There are no positive consequences in the picture the DOE wants to paint. It is all about money, greed, and a severe lack of knowledge about what is truly best for students.
The Charter School Office at the Delaware Department of Education will give a presentation to the State Board of Education on Thursday, November 19th. Among other things, they have rated charters on a scale of 1-3. These tiers will have 1 being good, 2 some issues, and 3…not so good. The charters at the Tier 3 status are Academia Antonio Alonso, Academy of Dover, Delaware Academy of Public Safety & Security, Delaware College Prep, Family Foundations Academy, Gateway Lab School, Odyssey Charter School, and Prestige Academy. This list does not include the charters that opened this year because there is nothing to compare their organizational and financial frameworks to. But even though Delaware Met and Delaware Design Lab are not on this list this does not mean they aren’t in trouble.
Delaware Design Lab High School is on probation following their formal review last year for low enrollment before they opened. The school did get their enrollment up, but according to this report the Charter School Office is reviewing their budget and enrollment and are on some type of corrective action. Delaware Met is on formal review for pretty much everything not even three months after they opened. One interesting observation was their final Charter School Accountability Committee meeting has been changed from November 30th to December 1st. I would imagine this is because the DOE has to face the Joint Finance Committee over at Legislative Hall on the 30th. It looks like the Charter School Office will be pushing more involvement with parents at the charters with Parent Teacher Organizations. Parent involvement is never a bad thing!
The Accountability Framework Working Group, the group tasked to provide recommendations for the Delaware School Success Framework is meeting now in Dover at the Townsend Building at the Delaware Department of Education. This should be very interesting!
Delaware Secretary of Education Dr. Steven Godowsky appears to be leading the meeting, along with Ryan Reyna from the Accountability and Assesssment area of the DOE. Delaware State Representatives Paul Baumbach and Kim Williams are here as well.
I’m not sure if Penny Schwinn will be attending this meeting. She has been very quiet lately…
Avi Wolfman-Arent with WHYY/Newswork just walked in. So did State Rep. John Kowalko. Everyone is introducing themselves. John Carwell with the DOE Charter School Office is attending as a non-voting member.
Secretary Godowsky stated there will be public comment, but he wants to relay the purpose of the committee. There were 16 meetings prior to this. He said he was confirmed as Secretary on October 28th. The ultimate goal of the AFWG was to get a level of commitment from all stakeholders. He appreciates everyone coming back for this meeting. He said he has watched from the outside the past couple years and wants everyone to work together to build a level of trust. He recognized there were changes to the AFWG’s recommendations. He is talking about his reversal on the opt-out penalty now. The first factor was the State Board’s position on the opt-out penalty. The consequences on the plan were not consequences. The State Board sets policy. They have a duty to look at students first and this influenced his thinking on this matter. As well, he said they are investigating the policy of getting rid of Smarter Balanced for juniors and replacing it with the SAT.
Godowsky said they met with the Chief School Officers and the State Board on 11//5 to discuss this transition. They came up with the possibility of perhaps doing this as early as Spring 2016 but there are a lot of details to sort out. He wants to be optimistic about that. Participation rate is key to their thinking and claims this is a civil rights issue and they have to test students in need. As they looked at their evidence higher performing students had not taken the test. On 11/7 there was an op/ed in the News Journal about achievement gaps and how protections need to be used to prevent a moral discrepancy. He met with the Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens and will speak with that group this evening. They respect their opinion but not the thousands of parents in Delaware.
They see more benefits for schools using the participation rate multiplier for schools in Delaware. This is also used to implement priority and reward schools. The priority schools will not be identified for another three years. They have already named these schools this year. The new framework will not be used this year and there will be no consequences this year. Now he is addressing schools that purposely left students out of the test. The New Castle County Vo-Tech District, of which Godowsky used to lead, was one of the first to recognize this. Now we know why Governor Markell picked him as Secretary of Education. He is talking about how Howard High School went from 56% to 80% proficiency. When you can control who gets in… The State Board raised these concerns in 2004 with students not being tested. Godowsky is stating the US DOE wants this as well. Where is the proof Dr. Secretary?
The consequences are significantly positive according to Godowsky. No, they are not. Now it is time for public comment. State Rep. Kim Williams gave public comment and said no superintendents are in agreement with the opt-out penalty. State Rep. Paul Baumbach said this is not gaming the system but empowering our parents. State Rep. Kowalko said there were several meetings without the AFWG that influenced his decision. The civil rights issue is not applicable to this situation. There are hidden fears perpetuated by the Federal Government and the State Board of Education regarding funding and a dismantling of the education system. RCEA President Mike Matthews said his membership voted against this penalty. He is talking about testing and punishing schools and giving more resources to high-needs schools. Hilary Clinton, according to Matthews, said teachers should not be evaluated. I gave public comment advising the State Board, the DOE and Secretary Godowsky they have no place determining parental rights. Especially over a flawed test that gives no immediate feedback or direct instruction for students. As well, they have provided no solid mandated proof of this opt-out penalty by the feds. Greg Mazotta is talking about the Baldridge Program.
AFWG member Bill Doolittle, representing the Delaware PTA, stated the federal intent was for schools excluding students from the test. The new ESEA reauthorization will have very little support for this and it will be up to the states. This was not a child-centered decision based on real world logic. This is a political decision. The AFWG’s recommendations gave the best outlook for students and will initiate confrontation. This decision will accelerate the opt-out movement in Delaware. With IDEA, they have used the NAEP standards giving parents the right to choose. We should do what they recommend. By agreeing to this it will distort data and the schools and DOE will not have clean data. SAT has a long history of discriminating against students with disabilities.
Deb Stevens with DSEA said she is very concerned about the State Board’s insistence on having negative consequences for schools in regards to participation rate. She supported the AFWG’s recommendations, but from what she is hearing it is not negative enough for the State Board. The State Board members have never had an opportunity to meet with the AFWG. She doesn’t understand the rationale of meeting with the State Board for 3 minutes a month before they act (as public comment at the State Board of Education meetings). This will not improve the student gaps and will not help with getting resources to schools. There is no confidence in this test based on the first-year results. They don’t know how valid or reliable the test is and it is foolish to attach consequences for a test with no track record. She will not change her vote that AFWG provided to the DOE.
Caesar Rodney Superintendent Kevin Fitzgerald is thanking Ryan and Penny for their guidance with the group as well as the members of AFWG. He said poverty was a major concern with this group. Schools with high poverty will be punished the most with this. AYP, or adequate yearly progress, does not work. The AFWG thought the consequences they decided on were good. He thinks moving towards the SAT is good because students are tested too much, especially in 11th grade. He has concerns with the disability questions with the SAT. There is no reason for the AFWG to change their recommendation because the Secretary and State Board will decide what they want. He hopes they put a great deal of thought into the changes.
Ken Hutchins with Capital School District said parents got back the scores and students who were once proficient are no longer proficient. He doesn’t think Delaware has hit their peak with the opt-out movement. This will cause opt-out to increase. He is a data guy.
Joe Jones with New Castle County Vo-Tech said the schools already know what supports and resources they need. He doesn’t think an assessment should drive that change. Delaware needs to work together to get these supports and not under the lens of a consequence. He said nothing came as a surprise and always knew these were just recommendations. He would love to see it one day come to fruition where assessment is not driving change.
Heath Chasanov, the Superintendent of the Woodbridge School District, thinks this will cause opt-out numbers to rise. He went out and visited all four of the schools in his district (laughter in the room) and the comment a top senior in his class said they don’t take the SBAC as seriously as the SAT. In terms of reading, the student said, the SBAC has flaws with the passages in the test.
Indian River’s Jay Owens supported the AFWG’s recommendations but he is excited about the possibility of the SAT and getting rid of SBAC for juniors. They have the ability to monitor the participation rate. They can take action as a district when the test is not being pushed by the schools.
Donna Johnson, Executive Director of the State Board of Education, is thanking the members of AFWG. It is no easy feat to come up with a framework like this. The State Board has publicly met outside of State Board meetings nine times over the Delaware School Success Framework. Dr. Gray heard the comments of this group. They are very clear about what the group’s recommendations are. The State Board did not believe developing a “plan” for opt-out was a good decision. “The State Board would prefer to see a consequence that is positive and negative.” Fitzgerald is stating there are no supports and resources to deal with the consequence. Is the State Board able to make a decision on that, Fitzgerald asked. Johnson said this was not a discussion at the State Board Retreat. Fitzgerald asked if any of the supports and resources are different than ones that currently exist to which Johnson said no.
Doolittle said some members who couldn’t make it submitted comments. He said the State Board has their own perception and this decision was not driven by Federal requirements and was driven by a desire from the State Board to have negative consequences. Stevens said the name and blame game is driven by Federal decision. But this does not provide the resources needed to move the needle and change the achievement gap. Johnson, in response to Doolittle, said schools should have a plan anyways if they don’t meet the 95% participation rate. I asked Johnson if Governor Markell advised the board to do this, wouldn’t they agree? She said no, they are their own board. She said I am entitled to my opinion. I responded I am, and many agree. I really need to check on my complaints with the DOJ today…
Godowsky is thanking the group. The comments were appreciated. Kowalko is asking what the exact negative consequence is from the State Board. He said the State Board did not specifically answer this. Johnson said the State Board did not suggest negative and punitive consequences. Doolittle said the AFWG was not given the right guidance from the Feds.
Yesterday, I wrote a post about the Senate Joint Resolution #2 Assessment Inventory Committee. I wrote how they did not give sufficient public notice for their meeting last night. Delaware law demands all public meetings be given a week notice with a posted agenda. The DOE did get this out there on November 3rd, and I must have missed it somehow. The DOE did act in full transparency in this situation. This does not mean I am a DOE cheerleader, but I will point out when I make a mistake. I emailed the powers that be over there just now about this with a heartfelt apology.
The Delaware DOE released the September 30th student counts. This helps to determine funding units for each school. Special Education is determined as one of three categories: Basic for 4-12, Intensive or Complex. There is no funding for Basic Special Education for students in Kindergarten to 3rd Grade, even though State Rep. Kim Williams attempted to get a bill passed during the first half of the 148th General Assembly. I sincerely hope her House Bill 30 gets passed in 2016, because these kids need this!
For the state, the average percentage of the 19,870 special education students out of the total enrollment of 136,027 is 14.6%. Traditional School Districts have 18,580 while Charters have 1,290. To put this in perspective, 18% of students in Traditional School Districts are Special Education compared to Charters at 10.1%. Had Kim Williams House Bill 30 passed, 2,467 students in basic special education in grades K-3 would have received the extra state funding they rightfully deserve. Instead, schools get nothing for these students. This is 12.4% of the special education population in Delaware that is being underserved by a funding issue.
Charter School enrollment grew by 12.7% with an increase of 1,591 students. Last year, 13,521 Delaware students attended charters, this year it is 14,112. Five new Delaware charters began this year, but two were shut down last year. Some of the schools, with Delaware Met loud and center, are having special education issues.
Without further ado, let’s get to the numbers! For each school district or charter, the first number is the special education percentage, followed by last year, then this year’s student count, followed by last year.
Traditional School Districts
Appoquinimink: 11.9%, last year 11.1%, Student Count: 10, 378, last year 9,870
Brandywine: 14.4%, last year 13.3%, Student Count: 10,580, last year 10,740
Caesar Rodney: 15.6%, last year 14.7%, Student Count: 7,221, last year 7,249
Cape Henlopen: 17.3%, last year 16.3%, Student Count: 5,170, last year 5,075
Capital: 18.9%, last year 17.4%, Student Count: 6,486, last year 6,665
Christina: 18.8%, last year 17.9%, Student Count: 15,553, last year 16,255
Colonial: 16.4%, last year 14.8%, Student Count: 9,763, last year 9,825
Delmar: 9.8%, last year 9.1%, Student Count: 1,347, last year 1,367
Indian River: 16.5%, last year 16.0%, Student Count: 10,171, last year 9,842
Lake Forest: 15.9%, last year 14.9%, Student Count: 3,794, last year 3,812
Laurel: 15.5%, last year 15.0%, Student Count: 2,221, last year 2,177
Milford: 14.1%, last year 13.6%, Student Count: 4,119, last year 4,197
New Castle County Vo-Tech: 12.0%, last year 12.4%, Student Count: 4,698, last year 4,629
Poly-Tech: 8.4%, last year 9.1%, Student Count: 1,194, last year 1,192
Red Clay Consolidated: 13.5%, last year 11.9%, Student Count: 16,094, last year 16,302
Seaford: 17.2%, last year 17.1%, Student Count: 3,473, last year 3,509
Smyrna: 15.3%, last year 14.4%, Student Count: 5,233, last year 5,279
Sussex Tech: 6.9%, last year 6.9%, Student Count: 1,444, last year 1,545
Woodbridge: 12.5%, last year 12.5%, Student Count: 2,466, last year 2,384
While a few districts stayed the same, it is obvious the bigger districts are actually rising with special education students at great rates. Last year, the special education population was 17.2% for traditional school districts, but it is up to 18% this year, a 4.4% increase. I’m not digging the vo-tech numbers and their downward trend. The vo-tech percentages as a whole are actually lower than the charter average. 7,336 Delaware students are attending vo-techs, but their special education average is 10.4%, much lower than the traditional school districts.
Last year, traditional school districts had 104,388 students and this year they went slightly down to 103,335 for a loss of 1,053 students. For the four Wilmington school districts, they all lost 1,132 students this year, with the majority of those belonging to Christina which lost 702 students. The charters gained 1,591 students. But did their special education numbers rise as well?
* means they just opened this year
Academia Antonia Alonso: 2.2%, last Year .9%, Student Count: 320, last year 221
Academy of Dover: 9.5%, last year 11.7%, Student Count: 284, last year 290
Campus Community: 6.7%, last Year 8.3%, Student Count: 417, last year 410
Charter School of Wilmington: .5%, last year .2%, Student Count: 972, last year 972
Del. Academy of Public Safety & Security: 19.5%, last year 16.5%, Student Count: 303, last year 363
Delaware College Prep: 1.6%, last year 2.5%, Student Count: 186, last year 203
*Delaware Design Lab High School: 20.6%, Student Count: 233
*Delaware Met: 27.9%, Student Count: 215
Delaware Military Academy: 3.9%, last year 3.0%, Student Count: 564, last year 569
Early College High School: 10.5%, last year 2.3%, Student Count: 209, last year 129
EastSide Charter: 12.9%, last year 14.8%, Student Count: 443, last year 418
Family Foundations Academy: 8.6%, last year 5.3%, Student Count: 792, last year 811
*First State Military Academy: 19.3%, Student Count: 202
First State Montessori Academy: 7.4%, last year 5.4%, Student Count: 325, last year 280
*Freire Charter School: 6.4%, Student Count: 234
Gateway Lab School: 60.8%, last year 59.9%, Student Count: 212, last year 212
*Great Oaks: 16.0%, Student Count: 212
Kuumba Academy: 10.5%, last year 6.3%, Student Count: 644, last year 464
Las Americas Aspiras: 8.5%, last year 5.7%, Student Count: 639, last year 541
MOT Charter School: 6.8%, last year 6.1%, Student Count: 1,013, last year 869
Newark Charter School: 6.4%, last year 5.6%, Student Count: 2,140, last year 1,948
Odyssey Charter School: 4.9%, last year 4.4%, Student Count: 1,160, last year 933
Positive Outcomes: 62.7%, last year 65.9%, Student Count: 126, last year 126
Prestige Academy: 27.2%, last year 22.0%, Student Count: 224, last year 246
Providence Creek Academy: 5.1%, last year 5.1%, Student Count: 690, last year 688
Sussex Academy: 4.9%, last year 3.6%, Student Count: 594, last year 498
Thomas Edison: 7.0%, last year 7.1%, Student Count: 758, last year 745
Last year, the charters had special education populations in total of 8.6%. This year they rose to 10.1%. This is a rise of 14.85% in students with disabilities receiving IEPs at Delaware charter schools, but don’t forget, they also had an increased student count of 1,591 students this year. They are up a bit from last year’s percentage of 12.7%, which is good. But it seems like the bulk of new IEPs are going to some of the newer charter schools, like Delaware Met, Delaware Design Lab, Great Oaks and First State Military. They are all well above the state average. But the much vaunted “zero tolerance” charter stumbles at the gate with a very low 6.4%. Charter School of Wilmington more than doubled their special education numbers. But really, going from .2% to .5% is a joke. Of concern are the two Dover charters who look like they are experiencing a downward trend in special education numbers. That isn’t good, which accounts for Capital’s very large rise in percentage. Down in Sussex Academy, it looks like the bulk of parents of special needs children chooses to send them to traditional school districts over Sussex Academy and Sussex Tech. My big question though, if Providence Creek stayed the same, and Smyrna went up, where are the First State Military special education kids coming from? This is a high school, so perhaps they are getting a lot of the Campus Community students that graduated from 8th grade there? Or maybe more from the Middletown-Odessa area? Who knows!
For student populations, the charters are definitely seeing upward movement, but one thing to remember is many of them are adding newer grades. When a charter is approved, they can’t just open up every grade at once. So it is a slow build. For already established charters, you see them leveling out around the same numbers from year to year. If I were Delaware College Prep and Delaware Academy of Public Safety & Security, I would be very worried about those falling numbers. Since the districts aren’t adding many numbers in your area, I would assume the bulk of your losses are going to other charters. So they don’t just take from the traditionals, they also feed off each other. It looks like the Middletown-Odessa area is having a huge population boom. Between Appoquinimink and MOT Charter School’s rise, that is a total of nearly 750 new students between the two. I would have expected Appoquinimink to decrease with the new MOT high school, but that isn’t the case at all.
It is obvious special education is on the rise in Delaware. But are all schools implementing IEPs with fidelity? I would find it very difficult to believe they are. In this era of accountability and standardized test scores, it has to be very hard for the administration and teachers of any school to keep up with it all. The DOE has so many demands going out to our schools, traditional and charter alike. And in the next year or so, all of these IEPs will transition to “standards-based” IEPs if they haven’t already. These are controversial, but many teachers swear they work better. The jury is still out on that one.
In the meantime, email your state legislators today and let them know they need to support House Bill 30 no matter what the budget says. The bill has been stuck in the Appropriations Committee for 9 months now. 2,467 Delaware students are not getting the supports they need. The funds this would generate would give these students more teachers and paraprofessionals. This is a crime this wasn’t included in this “needs-based” funding. There is a crucial need, and Delaware isn’t meeting it.
To find out how each school did in the traditional school districts with special education percentages and student counts by grade, they are all in the below report. Just hit the arrow on the bottom to get to the next page, or hit the full-screen button on the bottom right.