Since I’ve been posting articles the past couple days about Title I funding from the feds, I’ve received many questions about how these funds can be allocated. There is no simple answer as the below document from the Delaware Department of Education will show. This must be an accountant or auditor’s worst nightmare, trying to keep up with district budgets!
In addition, the formula was definitely changed in the past couple years based on this email from the DOE:
Low Socio-Economic Status (SES)
As many of you are aware, the USDA has made changes to the School Nutrition Programs. Most recently is the introduction of Community Eligibility.
In the past, the school nutrition program meal benefit eligibility forms have been the source data for low income determination. As you may remember, in March 2013 we told you that we would be moving to the DHSS Alternative Poverty (SNAP, TANF or Medicaid) measure for low socio economic status for 2013-14. Over the past year, we continued to get guidance from USDA and USED regarding these programs and application to other programs.
Based on this new information, the state will move to a standardized low socio-economic status measure. The new measure is Direct Certification or Direct Cert. This measure includes SNAP or TANF and does not include Medicaid. We strongly believe this is the purest measure of low socio economic status. In addition, the sharing of student level data is allowable for specific purposes. With Medicaid, there are potential issues of HIPPA.
The new low income indicator is defined to be:
A student is Low-SES if any one of the following two indicator is yes:
o TANF (Public assistance)
o SNAP (Food stamp)
For purposes of eSchool, the new indicator will be named: Low-Income. This is to distinguish from Low-SES that is used for the past four years. A separate data column in eSchool will be created for the new indicator. It will be co-existence with LOW-SES for the past years so that historical low-SES data will not be interrupted.
The new indicator will APPLY TO 2013-2014 DATA AND BEYOND starting from Fall 2013 DCAS reporting and all federal and state reporting including EDEN and school profiles. We may have instances where we will do a look-back with the Direct Certification data for trend purposes.
Districts are still able to use a different measure of poverty when distributing funds and providing services to their schools. The DDOE will not be collecting free and reduced lunch price information in the future, unless legislatively mandated to do so. If you do collect information through another means, you will be expected to secure those data appropriately.
We know we have reports online and published that have a different methodologies for low SES. Our plan is to highlight the change in methodology on these reports, and to be clear on any reports to you, which method of low SES we are using or had been used.
This email was sent to school leaders on May 30th, 2014…
5 thoughts on “How Can Title I Funds Be Distributed In Delaware School Districts And Charters?”
How is this information about a particular child (public assistance, and/or food stamps) delivered to the school?
That is a very good question. I would have to assume the state provides this information.
Does anyone from the DOE want to give an official response to this?
2012-13: 63.6% of students in Christina School District were Low SES with the old definition.
Since the new Low Income definition:
2013-14: 43.4% Low Income
2014-15: 41.0% Low Income
The difference here is that the requirement is now on the family to be enrolled in a state assistance program, rather than enrollment in free and reduced lunch through the school. Same number of low income kids…just not enrolled in state programs…or denied state assistance…or in the paperwork quagmire that is DHSS. I imagine tracking is also difficult as many parents, in my experience, don’t know the name (or acronym) of the program in which they are enrolled.