My Position on the Senate ESEA Reauthorization Draft

deutsch29: Mercedes Schneider's Blog

I have read (and reread certain sections of) the entire 601-page Senate reauthorization draft of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), written by Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray and named the Every Child Achieves  Act of 2015.

I have also read the 29 amendments that were added to the Act as it gained approval from the Senate Ed Committee on April 16, 2015.

In an effort to offer my readers a digest of the massive Senate ESEA draft, I wrote a series of six posts that can be accessed here. I also did the same for the 29 amendments, which resulted in a series of three posts that can be accessed here.

During this massive undertaking, I have had individuals asking about my position on the Senate ESEA draft. Even though some of my posts include glimpses into my thoughts about the…

View original post 1,442 more words

Say House Bill 50 Becomes Law….What Happens Next?

Steve Newton is a Professor of History and Science at Delaware State University.  He also ran for State Representative last fall as an independent.  I fully endorsed him at the time, and it would have been very interesting to add him to the dynamic down at Legislative Hall.  Steve wrote an excellent post today on Facebook about what happens after House Bill 50 is decided on.  With Steve’s permission, I share his awesome ideas with you.  Please let me know what you think and we can start to build a foundation for something.

The important truth to understand is that Opt-out is really a political and not really an educational strategy. That’s not a bad thing, but critical to understand. First, opting-out as an individual family educational strategy only avoids visiting the consequences of high-stakes testing on your child; it DOES NOT change the aim of the several months of classroom experience before that, which is–in many schools–directed preparation toward a test that the student will not take. By itself, opt-out will only be a bump in the road, unless …

… unless we recognize that opt-out is the most effective political strategy that anti-corporate-reformers have come up with to date. Resistance to Common Core has been too easily pigeon-holed as right wing or conservative, and the potential coalition of left and right wings behind education is going to get severely undermined in a presidential election year. Simply put, Democrats as a group are not going to vote for Rand Paul or Marco Rubio simply based on Common Core.

But opt-out is different. Opt-out focuses on the potential harm (or lack of value) to MY child, and offers ME a chance to do something. Moreover, it is about local politics. The Governor may rant and rave (he usually does), but this is an issue where (again, in an election year) voters WILL punish their legislators. Moreover, opt-out has DSEA and DPTA back on the same page, resisting a government mandate.

Even if opt-out passes, however, the momentum will be lost UNLESS an equally wide-ranging follow-up goal is established. This will have to be selected carefully. Resistance to charters or teacher evaluation programs is all well and good for education activists, teachers, and other insiders, but those are unfortunately NOT propositions that are going to reach as wide an audience as opt-out has. There are way too many pro-charter parents and voters, and way too few people who will do more than shake their head about teacher evaluations. They certainly won’t vote out the state rep who got their sewer fixed because of it.

Here’s my initial suggestion, (and being a libertarian there’s an agorist twist): let’s put DSEA, DPTA, and as many parents and academic partners as we can find at work on a new Delaware Content Standards Project. We did this as part of Pat Forgione’s New Directions agenda two decades ago, and there is a lot to learn from that process. First lesson: we don’t need to have government sanction or even government participation–in spite of how they act, for example, Rodel is not part of the government. We can create our own organization to do this work, and invite the districts to participate. If DOE would like to observe the process, well, it’s still supposedly a free country.

Second, let’s invert the usual approach. Common Core started with ELA and Math. Instead of going head-to-head with that initiative, let’s start with one or more of the following:

Standards for integrating the Arts and Music into the core academic curriculum.

Standards for developing interdisciplinary units that combine Social Studies and Science to examine how technology and new research is affecting the way we live.

Standards for the services necessary for special needs children with disabilities not normally covered under the easier rubrics of IDEA.

Standards that integrate healthy living (Physical Education/Health) with Civics (building healthy communities) and Technology (building platforms–apps if you will–to allow people to have more control over what they eat, how they exercise, and how they live).

The beautiful part about starting here is that by starting with integrative standards, not content-level standards, we get back toward actual teaching and learning that matters. Meeting the Math and ELA proficiency requirements is easily addressed within that more meaningful context.

More to the point, these standards would be voluntary, but schools that met specific benchmarks toward implementing them could receive certification from DSEA, DPTA, National Council for Social Studies, and other organizations. Eventually, if we did this right over a 2-3 year period, I’m pretty sure we could even build up some financial support from a variety of carefully considered sources.

This is an endeavor that, realistically speaking, I doubt will happen. I doubt it because I’m not the person to put it together, and any group of people that gets together with the time, energy, and motivation is going to come up with its own plan. But I offer this as an alternative–a non-governmental political alternative–run by parents and teachers themselves to having to always sit back and respond to the horrible things being done to education today, rather than initiative our own mechanisms for positive change.

In other words, it is time to go on offense in a strategic sense.

Steve is absolutely right on all of this.  What I love about the opt-out movement in Delaware is the bi-partisanship of it all.  Democrats and Republicans are coming together and uniting in a common cause…our children.   Steve is not asking to lead a group, and I can’t say I would want that either, but coming together would be good.  I tried to get something going with parents of special needs children last summer, but this blog was brand new and the readership certainly wasn’t anywhere close to where it is now.  We have already changed the conversation with the opt-out movement.  Let’s keep talking….

Delaware Parent’s Awesome Letter To Legislators In Support of House Bill 50 #supportHB50

Delaware Parent and Teacher Natalie Ganc wrote  an excellent letter to the Delaware House of Representatives regarding House Bill 50, the parent opt-out bill.  She raised a very good point which I haven’t heard too much in the conversation about this legislation.  Read below to find out what it was!

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 26

In Part 26 we get some razzle dazzle on the part of Penny Schwinn.  Actually, that’s more like DASL… the controversial report the University of Delaware did for some of the priority schools.  The report made the schools look better than how the Delaware DOE was portraying them, but Mark Murphy refused to sign off on them.  Maybe the answer for that can be found here….

Scan0016

Scan0017

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 25

25 parts and we haven’t even hit September 4th yet.  This crazy journey has been crazy, but hang on.,..the best, or worst, depending on your perspective, is yet to come.  Revelations galore await you.  So fasten your seatbelt…

Scan0015

Interest link Kate Villari.  For those who want to see it, go 

Click to access Template_MOU_between_an_LEA_and_a_Lead_Partner.pdf

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 24

In Part 24, we get some answers about timelines and when the superintendents found out about the priority schools.  What Tina Shockley says to Mark Murphy is VERY important.

Scan0013

She tells him to be honest and sincere and forthcoming.

Scan0014

So Merv and Freeman found out about two weeks prior to the announcement.  Unless the meetings were canceled, but I don’t see any other mention of that.  Did the two notify their boards and staff right away?  Not according to information I have heard from several individuals.  Why is that?  We also see the planning for the actual announcement start to take shape…

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 23

The next emails occur a few days before the State Board of Education meeting.  Penny is trying to wrap her head around the whole partnership zone issue, even though she has now been at the DOE over 2 1/2 months…

Scan0010

Scan0011

Scan0012

As Ted tries desperately to explain to Penny how it works, it is becoming obvious Penny doesn’t get the whole thing, especially after her infamous comment at the upcoming State Board meeting.

In the second email, we see Penny laying down the law for a couple employees who were not at work on a Monday.  She seems rather dismissive of them and the work they do…

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 22

This chain of emails is very interesting.  We have Penny dealing with two different parties on the MOU.  Or does Debon have something else in mind?  Read the emails and try to figure this one out…

Scan0005

Scan0006

Scan0007

Scan0008

Scan0009

Who in the world is Debon Lewis?  According to his LinkedIn account he is a co-founder of a couple of companies called AKALA Inc. and Transformative Growth Founders.  AKALA, founded in August 2014, and TGF in September 2014.  In addition, he started consultant work with a company called SchoolWorks in Septermber.  Prior to that, Lewis was a principal at a KIPP high school in Brooklyn, NY.

Could Lewis have been helping with the school leader aspect of the priority schools?  Note that Lewis is using a gmail account as opposed to an official company.  Also note Lewis is paid as an individual and not any company.  The mystery continues…

Department: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – Vendor: DEBON LEWIS
for
Period: FY 2015 Period 1 thru 9

No. of Payments: Amount:
4 $21,850.00
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 2/6/2015 $8,000.00 403570
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 11/12/2014 $8,000.00 377197
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 12/3/2014 $1,350.00 383786
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 2/24/2015 $4,500.00 408417
 

 

Delaware Priority Schools: The Truth Revealed Part 21

It would have helped if the document they are referring to in this email was included with  the actual email, but hey, beggars can’t be choosers.  This brings us back to what was surely a thorn in the DOE’s side on August 7th last summer.  Penny has to get ready for that big State Board of Education presentation next week, and this Christina Dan guy keeps coming back.  I’m sure it was a challenge she could overcome…

Scan0003

Scan0004